Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro vs Realme GT 7 (Global)

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.67-inch Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on November 27, 2024, against the Realme GT 7 (Global), which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400e and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • 22% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3068K versus 2505K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • 17% higher pixel density (526 vs 450 PPI)
  • 40% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3049 and 2184 points
Reasons to consider the Realme GT 7 (Global)
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • The phone is 6 months newer
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro and Realme GT 7 (Global) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
53.8
(Average)
Value Index
75.6
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.67 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1440 x 3200 pixels 1264 x 2780 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 526 ppi 450 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 6000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Longjing glass 2 Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 89.4% 89.8%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Peak brightness test (auto)

Design and build

Height 160.26 mm (6.31 inches) 162.42 mm (6.39 inches)
Width 74.95 mm (2.95 inches) 76.13 mm (3 inches)
Thickness 8.39 mm (0.33 inches) 8.3 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 212 g (7.48 oz) 206 g (7.27 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Black, Green Black, Blue, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.4/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) Β· 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro and Realme GT 7 (Global)
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
Max clock 4320 MHz 3400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 790
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro and Realme GT 7 (Global)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3049
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
9184
Compute Score (GPU)
23881
Compute Score (GPU) 23881 15981
Single-core score 3049 2184
Multi-core score 9184 7300
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3068164
2505807
CPU 876628 734964
GPU 1108143 830537
Memory 438174 358578
UX 645219 581728
Total score 3068164 2505807
Samples [8 tests] [30 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2250
Stability 80% 59%
Graphics test 17 FPS 14 FPS
Graphics score 2250 1916
3DMark Solar Bay
10173
Graphics test 39 FPS 31 FPS
Section 1 43 FPS 33 FPS
Section 2 39 FPS 31 FPS
Section 3 33 FPS 27 FPS
Graphics score 10173 8040
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability 75% -
Graphics test 34 FPS -
Graphics score 5841 -
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
19268
Web score 21924 17009
Video editing 8128 6480
Photo editing 37071 26452
Data manipulation 18264 15003
Writing score 21828 22746
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (88th and 134th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-01 (Reza)AnTuTu3315848
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-15 (Asura)AnTuTu3385729
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-06 (Mine_Tuan271)AnTuTu3068164
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-17 (AsuraVN)AnTuTu3014660
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-16 (AsuraVN)AnTuTu2978441
Realme GT 7 (Global)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-05 (montyy)AnTuTu2483073
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 -> Regenis0CPU Throttle76%
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-30 -> Regenis0AnTuTu2456694
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-22 (JP)AnTuTu2518801
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-10 (Nayan kumar)AnTuTu2399920

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15
ROM HyperOS 3 Realme UI 6.0
OS updates 4 years 6 years
Security updates 5 years -

Battery

Capacity 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (50 W) No
Reverse charging Yes, (wireless) Yes
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (50% in 11 min) Yes (56% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:28 hr 0:36 hr
Battery cycles - 800 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 18:23 hr
Watching video - 22:53 hr
Gaming - 09:51 hr
Standby - 113 hr
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2.5x Optical, 2x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 24FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 1920 FPS (720p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120Β° 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 32 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.6 f/1.8
Focal length 24 mm -
Sensor OmniVision Light Hunter 800 Sony IMX906
Sensor size 1/1.55" (β‰ˆ 0.65 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 60 mm 47 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Optical Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 32 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 16 mm
Sensor Samsung ISOCELL S5KKD1 Omnivision OV08D10
Sensor size 1/3.44" (β‰ˆ 0.29 inch) 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 32 megapixels
Aperture - f/2.5
Focal length - 21 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV20B Sony IMX615
Sensor size 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/2.74" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced November 2024 May 2025
Release date November 2024 May 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $510 $749
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 120 W Yes, 120 W
Further details
Notes on GT 7 (Global):
    - The Dream Edition is thicker at 8.73 mm and 5 grams heavier.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, connectivity, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro. But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the Realme GT 7 (Global).

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!