Home > Smartphone comparison > Redmi K90 vs Reno 15 Pro – which one to choose?

Xiaomi Redmi K90 vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro

87 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi K90
VS
80 out of 100
Oppo Reno 15 Pro
Xiaomi Redmi K90
Oppo Reno 15 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.59-inch Xiaomi Redmi K90 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on October 28, 2025, against the Oppo Reno 15 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8450 and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K90
  • 52% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3126K versus 2057K)
  • Comes with 900 mAh larger battery capacity: 7100 vs 6200 mAh
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 3.1
  • 80% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3001 and 1671 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15 Pro
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 10% higher pixel density (460 vs 419 PPI)
  • Weighs 19 grams less
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi K90 and Oppo Reno 15 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
66.5
(Good)
Value Index
60.5
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Redmi K90
vs
Reno 15 Pro

Display

Type OLED AMOLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.32 inches
Resolution 1156 x 2510 pixels 1216 x 2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 419 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness - 600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 1800 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 89.9% 89.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Screen space comparison
Redmi K90
6.59β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 16.5 in2
Reno 15 Pro
6.32β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.2 in2
~8% more screen space

Design and build

Height 157.49 mm (6.2 inches) 151.21 mm (5.95 inches)
Width 75.25 mm (2.96 inches) 72.42 mm (2.85 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 7.99 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 206 g (7.27 oz) 187 g (6.6 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue, Purple Blue, Brown
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
Redmi K90
89.9%
Reno 15 Pro
89.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi K90 and Oppo Reno 15 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 8450
Max clock 4470 MHz 3250 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)		 - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
L3 cache 8 MB 6 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon MediaTek NPU 880
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Mali-G720 MP7
GPU shading units 1536 896
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi K90 and Oppo Reno 15 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Redmi K90 +80%
3001
Reno 15 Pro
1671
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Redmi K90 +41%
9442
Reno 15 Pro
6695
Compute Score (GPU)
Redmi K90 +104%
25162
Reno 15 Pro
12314
Compute Score (GPU) 25162 12314
Single-core score 3001 1671
Multi-core score 9442 6695
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Redmi K90 +52%
3126494
Reno 15 Pro
2057699
CPU 855427 649386
GPU 1149527 648554
Memory 475197 279684
UX 646343 480075
Total score 3126494 2057699
Samples [7 tests] [2 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Graphics test 17 FPS -
Graphics score 2328 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 41 FPS -
Section 1 47 FPS -
Section 2 41 FPS -
Section 3 35 FPS -
Graphics score 10874 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 21945 -
Video editing 8458 -
Photo editing 39118 -
Data manipulation 16086 -
Writing score 22647 -
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi K90
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (Khao D)AnTuTu3059889
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (Bahodir)AnTuTu3143183
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (ThanhTai)AnTuTu3126494
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 -> BaominhAnTuTu3248037
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-17 (Thien)AnTuTu3223695
Add View all (10)
Oppo Reno 15 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-10 (Sinif2011)AnTuTu2057699
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-24 (Π”Π°Ρ€ΠΈΠ½Π°)AnTuTu2050891
Add View all (2)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 4266 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 ColorOS 16
OS updates - 5 years
Security updates - 6 years

Battery

Capacity 7100 mAh 6200 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging - Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes (76% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 0:53 hr
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Zoom Optical, 2.5x Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 120Β° 116Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.8
Focal length - 24 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 Samsung ISOCELL HP5
Sensor size 1/1.55" (β‰ˆ 0.65 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.5 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/3.0 f/2.8
Focal length - 85 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50M -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length - 16 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV08F -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length - 18 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV20B -
Sensor size 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Autofocus - No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version - 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - No

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 November 2025
Release date October 2025 November 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $370 $639
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi K90 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
1 (50%)
1 (50%)
Total votes: 2

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi Redmi K90 vs OnePlus 15
2. Xiaomi Redmi K90 vs OnePlus Ace 6 (6)
3. Xiaomi Redmi K90 vs Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max (3)
4. Xiaomi Redmi K90 vs Xiaomi Redmi K80
5. Xiaomi Redmi K90 vs Realme GT 8 (China) (1)
6. Oppo Reno 15 Pro vs Vivo X200 FE
7. Oppo Reno 15 Pro vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro
8. Oppo Reno 15 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25
9. Oppo Reno 15 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский