Vivo X200 FE vs Oppo Reno 15 Pro
78
out of 100
VS
80
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.31-inch Vivo X200 FE (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on June 23, 2025, against the Oppo Reno 15 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8450 and came out 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Vivo X200 FE
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Supports higher wattage charging (90W versus 80W)
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- 32% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2209 and 1671 points
Reasons to consider the Oppo Reno 15 Pro
- The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.31 inches | 6.32 inches |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels | 1216 x 2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 461 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 600 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 5000 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch sampling rate | 300 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen protection | Schott Xensation Core | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.3% | 89.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | 360 Hz | - |
| Response time | 1 ms | - |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | - |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 150.8 mm (5.94 inches) | 151.21 mm (5.95 inches) |
| Width | 71.8 mm (2.83 inches) | 72.42 mm (2.85 inches) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 187 g (6.6 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP69 |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | Glass |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink, Yellow | Blue, Brown |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.99/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 100 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 896 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~2329.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 15299 | 12314 |
| Single-core score | 2209 | 1671 |
| Multi-core score | 7239 | 6695 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 662181 | 649386 |
| GPU | 664075 | 648554 |
| Memory | 295511 | 279684 |
| UX | 518654 | 480075 |
| Total score | 2140421 | 2057699 |
| Samples | [10 tests] | [2 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 65% | - |
| Graphics test | 12 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1561 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 26 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 28 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 26 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 22 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 6745 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13991 | - |
| Video editing | 5556 | - |
| Photo editing | 26454 | - |
| Data manipulation | 12139 | - |
| Writing score | 21943 | - |
Recent User Tests
Vivo X200 FE
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-11 (Viva plesenь) | AnTuTu | 2148340 |
| 📘 2026-08-31 (Jojorabbit95) | AnTuTu | 2306009 |
| 📘 2026-06-14 (ShaSha) | AnTuTu | 2235448 |
| 📘 2026-06-04 (Pranav) | AnTuTu | 2140421 |
| 📘 2026-05-17 (Sanjeep halder) | AnTuTu | 1793939 |
Oppo Reno 15 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-10 (Sinif2011) | AnTuTu | 2057699 |
| 📘 2026-01-24 (Дарина) | AnTuTu | 2050891 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | - | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | Funtouch 15 | ColorOS 16 |
| OS size | 57 GB | - |
| OS updates | 3 years | 5 years |
| Security updates | 4 years | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 6200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 90 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (48% in 30 min) | Yes (76% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:58 hr | 0:53 hr |
| Battery cycles | 800 cycles | - |
| Web browsing | 11:34 hr | - |
| Watching video | 15:00 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:21 hr | - |
| Standby | 108 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 200 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | - |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 960 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 119° | 116° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX921 | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) | 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 0.5 micron |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 85 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX882 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.8 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV08D10 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 20 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KKD1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | June 2025 | November 2025 |
| Release date | July 2025 | November 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $650 | $639 |
| Successor | - Vivo X300 FE | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 90 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera, battery life, and software are more important to you, then choose the Oppo Reno 15 Pro. But if the performance, gaming, connectivity, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Vivo X200 FE.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 21
Related comparisons
9.
Vivo X200 FE vs OnePlus 13s (2)