Xiaomi Redmi K90 vs Vivo iQOO 15

87 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi K90
VS
93 out of 100
Vivo iQOO 15

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.59-inch Xiaomi Redmi K90 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on October 28, 2025, against the Vivo iQOO 15, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K90
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 15
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Handles wireless charging up to 40W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • 26% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3950K versus 3126K)
  • 21% higher pixel density (508 vs 419 PPI)
  • 19% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3584 and 3001 points
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi K90 and Vivo iQOO 15 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
79*
89*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
94*
100
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
87*
93*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
66.5
(Good)
Value Index
63.4
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type OLED AMOLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.85 inches
Resolution 1156 x 2510 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 419 ppi 508 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 2600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 6000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz -
Screen protection Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 89.9% 90.2%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 100%
PWM - 561 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
n/a
2943 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 157.49 mm (6.2 inches) 163.65 mm (6.44 inches)
Width 75.25 mm (2.96 inches) 76.8 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 8.1 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 206 g (7.27 oz) 220 g (7.76 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue, Purple White, Black, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
89.9%
90.2%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi K90 and Vivo iQOO 15
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 4470 MHz 4610 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi K90 and Vivo iQOO 15
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3001
iQOO 15 +19%
3584
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
9442
iQOO 15 +18%
11143
Compute Score (GPU)
25162
iQOO 15 +8%
27247
Compute Score (GPU) 25162 27247
Single-core score 3001 3584
Multi-core score 9442 11143
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3126494
iQOO 15 +26%
3950082
CPU 855427 1112833
GPU 1149527 1494722
Memory 475197 442350
UX 646343 900177
Total score 3126494 3950082
Samples [7 tests] [24 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2328
iQOO 15 +21%
2806
Stability - 54%
Graphics test 17 FPS 21 FPS
Graphics score 2328 2806
3DMark Solar Bay
10874
iQOO 15 +12%
12156
Graphics test 41 FPS 46 FPS
Section 1 47 FPS 52 FPS
Section 2 41 FPS 46 FPS
Section 3 35 FPS 40 FPS
Graphics score 10874 12156
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
n/a
6752
Graphics test - 40 FPS
Graphics score - 6752
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Redmi K90 +13%
19246
16959
Web score 21945 14169
Video editing 8458 6652
Photo editing 39118 35337
Data manipulation 16086 14682
Writing score 22647 29367
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (74th and 20th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi K90
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (Khao D)AnTuTu3059889
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (Bahodir)AnTuTu3143183
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (ThanhTai)AnTuTu3126494
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 -> BaominhAnTuTu3248037
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-17 (Thien)AnTuTu3223695
Vivo iQOO 15
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-11 (Rtesh)AnTuTu3886893
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-10 (Ranit)AnTuTu3974227
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-07 (tt:shikazik)AnTuTu4017492
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-17 (Skarvinarn)AnTuTu3902163
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-03 (cA27)AnTuTu4140036

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 OriginOS 6
OS size - 57 GB
OS updates - 5 years
Security updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7100 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (40 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging - Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes (60% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 0:52 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 18:52 hr
Watching video - 27:27 hr
Gaming - 09:04 hr
Standby - 147 hr
General battery life
n/a
39:26 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2.5x Optical, 3x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120Β° 107Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.9
Focal length - 23 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.55" (β‰ˆ 0.65 inch) 1/1.56" (β‰ˆ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/3.0 f/2.7
Focal length - 85 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50M Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.8 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.1
Focal length - 15 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV08F Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size - 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 21 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV20B GalaxyCore GC32E1
Sensor size 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/3.1" (β‰ˆ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus - No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version - 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - No
Speakers test
Max loudness
n/a
84.1 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 October 2025
Release date October 2025 October 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $370 $699
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display, camera, gaming, battery life, and connectivity are more important to you, then choose the Vivo iQOO 15. But if the software, design, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Redmi K90.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
11 (64.7%)
6 (35.3%)
Total votes: 17

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!