Xiaomi Redmi K90 vs 17 Pro

87 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi K90
VS
91 out of 100
Xiaomi 17 Pro

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.59-inch Xiaomi Redmi K90 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on October 28, 2025, against the Xiaomi 17 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K90
  • Comes with 800 mAh larger battery capacity: 7100 vs 6300 mAh
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 17 Pro
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • 14% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3569K versus 3126K)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • 11% higher pixel density (464 vs 419 PPI)
  • 29% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3871 and 3001 points
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi K90 and 17 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
79*
91*
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
94*
96*
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
87*
91*
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
66.5
(Good)
Value Index
38.6
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
vs

Display

Type OLED AMOLED
Size 6.59 inches 6.3 inches
Resolution 1156 x 2510 pixels 1220 x 2656 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 419 ppi 464 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 1200 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 3500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 300 Hz
Screen protection Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass Dragon Crystal Glass 3
Screen-to-body ratio 89.9% 89.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 102.8%
PWM - 120 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Redmi K90
6.59β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 16.5 in2
17 Pro
6.3β€³ (19.5:9 ratio) = 15.1 in2
~9% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
n/a
1039 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 157.49 mm (6.2 inches) 151.1 mm (5.95 inches)
Width 75.25 mm (2.96 inches) 71.8 mm (2.83 inches)
Thickness 8 mm (0.31 inches) 8 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 206 g (7.27 oz) 192 g (6.77 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP68
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material - Plastic
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue, Purple White, Black, Green, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
89.9%
89.9%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi K90 and Xiaomi 17 Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 4470 MHz 4610 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache 8 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi K90 and Xiaomi 17 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
3001
17 Pro +29%
3871
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
9442
17 Pro +27%
12033
Compute Score (GPU)
25162
17 Pro +9%
27343
Compute Score (GPU) 25162 27343
Single-core score 3001 3871
Multi-core score 9442 12033
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3126494
17 Pro +14%
3569354
CPU 855427 1004041
GPU 1149527 1307517
Memory 475197 470024
UX 646343 787772
Total score 3126494 3569354
Samples [7 tests] [4 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
2328
17 Pro +3%
2404
Stability - 81%
Graphics test 17 FPS 18 FPS
Graphics score 2328 2404
3DMark Solar Bay
Redmi K90 +1%
10874
10752
Graphics test 41 FPS 41 FPS
Section 1 47 FPS 49 FPS
Section 2 41 FPS 41 FPS
Section 3 35 FPS 34 FPS
Graphics score 10874 10752
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Redmi K90 +4%
19246
18486
Web score 21945 17802
Video editing 8458 8078
Photo editing 39118 37143
Data manipulation 16086 17701
Writing score 22647 24706
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (80th and 41st place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi K90
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-03 (Khao D)AnTuTu 113059889
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (Bahodir)AnTuTu 113143183
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-21 (ThanhTai)AnTuTu 113126494
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-29 -> BaominhAnTuTu 113248037
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-17 (Thien)AnTuTu 113223695
Xiaomi 17 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-30 (Mmm.)AnTuTu 113569354
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-27 (Mm)AnTuTu 113433545
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-28 (aabdy)AnTuTu 113705564
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-09 (.)AnTuTu 113554073
πŸ“˜ 2025-12-13 -> JuubidaraGeekbench 6 CPU3860 / 12136

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3 HyperOS 3
OS size - 54 GB
OS updates - 6 years
Security updates - 6 years

Battery

Capacity 7100 mAh 6300 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging - Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes (70% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 0:47 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Optical, 2.5x Optical, 5x
Flash Dual LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 1920 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 120Β° 102Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.7
Focal length - 23 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50 Light Hunter 800 Omnivision 950L LightHunter
Sensor size 1/1.55" (β‰ˆ 0.65 inch) 1/1.28" (β‰ˆ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/3.0 f/3.0
Focal length - 115 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50M Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) 1/2.0" (β‰ˆ 0.5 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length - 17 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV08F Omnivision OV50M
Sensor size - 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 8192 x 6144
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 21 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV20B Omnivision OV50M
Sensor size 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/2.88" (β‰ˆ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.61 micron
Autofocus - Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version - 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort - Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
n/a
85.6 dB

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 September 2025
Release date October 2025 September 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $370 $899
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, connectivity, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi 17 Pro. But if the design is more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Redmi K90.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
2 (40%)
3 (60%)
Total votes: 5

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!