Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G vs 15T Pro
70
out of 100
VS
86
out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G
12 / 512 GB
Xiaomi 15T Pro
12 / 512 GB
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4) that was released on December 18, 2025, against the Xiaomi 15T Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G
- Delivers 126% higher peak brightness (3181 against 1409 nits)
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 6500 vs 5500 mAh
- Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi 15T Pro
- The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
- 2.7x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2788K versus 1024K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Handles wireless charging up to 50W
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.83 inches | 6.83 inches |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2772 pixels | 1280 x 2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 447 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (30-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1400 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 3200 nits | 3200 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | - | 480 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5% | 90.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.34 mm (6.43 inches) | 162.7 mm (6.41 inches) |
| Width | 78.31 mm (3.08 inches) | 77.9 mm (3.07 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.91 mm (0.31 inches) | 7.96 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 207 g (7.3 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP69 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | - | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Eco-leather | - |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | White, Black, Blue, Purple | Black, Gold, Gray |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | Average (2.63/5) | Average (2.63/5) |
| Drop resistance | Excellent (A) · 270 drops | Excellent (A) · 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus |
| Max clock | 2700 MHz | 3630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) |
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
| L3 cache | - | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Adreno 810 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 895 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~458.2 GFLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 4716 | 23010 |
| Single-core score | 1222 | 2529 |
| Multi-core score | 3251 | 7899 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 390323 | 785620 |
| GPU | 183859 | 1057591 |
| Memory | 181087 | 385760 |
| UX | 268965 | 559468 |
| Total score | 1024234 | 2788439 |
| Samples | [7 tests] | [50 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 77% |
| Graphics test | - | 17 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2268 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 37 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 42 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 38 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 32 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 9752 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14468 | 17483 |
| Video editing | 7782 | 6965 |
| Photo editing | 22069 | 30630 |
| Data manipulation | 11271 | 15940 |
| Writing score | 17239 | 20434 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#129th place)
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-07-21 (Bomi) | AnTuTu 11 | 1049904 |
| 📘 2026-07-08 (Ethab) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1222 / 3251 |
| 📘 2026-07-05 -> Weedsmoker13 | Battery life | SOT 2:02 / – |
| 📘 2026-07-05 -> Weedsmoker13 | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1217 / 3169 |
| 📘 2026-06-17 (Bomi) | AnTuTu 11 | 1047857 |
Xiaomi 15T Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-16 -> la.mih0 | AnTuTu 12 | 2649888 |
| 📘 2026-09-16 -> kannzera | AnTuTu 11 | 2643488 |
| 📘 2026-09-15 (k) | AnTuTu 11 | 2643488 |
| 📘 2026-09-09 -> cyberQbit | AnTuTu 12 | 2600160 |
| 📘 2026-08-25 -> KerimTheBabo31 | AnTuTu 11 | 2759001 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | HyperOS 3.0 |
| OS updates | 5 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 6500 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 100 W | 90 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (78% in 30 min) | Yes (87% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 0:48 hr | 0:36 hr |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | 1600 cycles |
| Web browsing | 10:18 hr | 12:09 hr |
| Watching video | 18:31 hr | 19:35 hr |
| Gaming | 06:41 hr | 07:04 hr |
| Standby | 134 hr | 108 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (93rd and 98th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 120FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (720p) | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 120° | 120° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 200 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 12 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | - | Omnivision OVX9100 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) | 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.56 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/3.0 |
| Focal length | - | 115 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
DxOMark main camera tests
Photo quality
Video quality
Generic main camera score
| Bokeh | - | 160 |
| Zoom | - | 127 |
| Samples | - | Photo samples of Xiaomi 15T Pro from DxOMark |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) | 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Depends on the region | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | December 2025 | September 2025 |
| Release date | December 2025 | September 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $899 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | - | Not included |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi 15T Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 33