Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G vs Poco F7

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4) that was released on December 18, 2025, against the Xiaomi Poco F7, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G
  • Delivers 108% higher peak brightness (3176 against 1525 nits)
  • Shows 7% longer battery life (27:56 vs 26:05 hours)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 90W)
  • The phone is 6 months newer
  • Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7
  • 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2263K versus 1024K)
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 2.2
  • 67% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2040 and 1222 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and Poco F7 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.83 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1280 x 2772 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 447 ppi 447 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1400 nits 1700 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 3200 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate - 480 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 89.5% 90.1%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 100%
PWM - 240 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
3176 nits
1525 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.34 mm (6.43 inches) 163.1 mm (6.42 inches)
Width 78.31 mm (3.08 inches) 77.9 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 7.91 mm (0.31 inches) 8.2 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 207 g (7.3 oz) 215.7 g (7.61 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP68
Advanced cooling - Vapor chamber
Rear material Eco-leather Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue, Purple White, Black, Silver
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.63/5) Average (2.61/5)
Drop resistance Excellent (A) · 270 drops Average (D) · 45 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Max clock 2700 MHz 3210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
- 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
- 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache - 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 810 Adreno 825
GPU shading units 256 1024
GPU clock 895 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS ~458.2 GFLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G and Xiaomi Poco F7
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 4716 13641
Single-core score 1222 2040
Multi-core score 3251 6373
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Poco F7 +121%
2263357
CPU 390323 632157
GPU 183859 793892
Memory 181087 365292
UX 268965 472016
Total score 1024234 2263357
Samples [7 tests] [170 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 83%
Graphics test - 13 FPS
Graphics score - 1688
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 29 FPS
Section 1 - 33 FPS
Section 2 - 30 FPS
Section 3 - 25 FPS
Graphics score - 7708
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 14468 15597
Video editing 7782 7750
Photo editing 22069 26988
Data manipulation 11271 13734
Writing score 17239 17764

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-21 (Bomi)AnTuTu 111049904
📘 2026-07-08 (Ethab)Geekbench 6 CPU1222 / 3251
📘 2026-07-05 -> Weedsmoker13Battery lifeSOT 2:02 / –
📘 2026-07-05 -> Weedsmoker13Geekbench 6 CPU1217 / 3169
📘 2026-06-17 (Bomi)AnTuTu 111047857
Xiaomi Poco F7
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-30 (Luis)AnTuTu 122422061
📘 2026-09-29 (Thai)AnTuTu 122603535
📘 2026-09-27 (Thai)AnTuTu 122562298
📘 2026-09-22 (Deff)AnTuTu 122452982
📘 2026-09-08 (Semechka)AnTuTu 122437593

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 4800 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 2.0 HyperOS 3.0
OS size - 44 GB
OS updates 5 years 4 years
Security updates - 6 years

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 6500 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 90 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes (78% in 30 min) Yes (90% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:48 hr 0:39 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:18 hr 10:24 hr
Watching video 18:31 hr 14:33 hr
Gaming 06:41 hr 07:05 hr
Standby 134 hr 130 hr
General battery life
26:05 hr
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (93rd and 135th place)

Main camera

Matrix 200 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution - 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (720p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 200 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.7 f/1.5
Focal length 23 mm 26 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX882
Sensor size 1/1.4" (≈ 0.71 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.56 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor - Omnivision OV08F
Sensor size 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 20 megapixels
Image resolution - 5184 x 3888
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 21 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV32D Omnivision OV20B
Sensor size 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Depends on the region Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* Yes No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced December 2025 June 2025
Release date December 2025 June 2025
Launch price (MSRP) - $399
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger - Yes, 90 W
Further details
Notes on Poco F7:
    - The Indian model has a larger battery — 7550 mAh.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco F7 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
25 (14.7%)
145 (85.3%)
Total votes: 170

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
IT Division March 19, 2026 at 08:05 AM
By far the most detailed comparison that provides data
0 Reply
Avatar
Testi January 19, 2026 at 01:24 PM
Hmm Preety good website
0 Reply