Home > Smartphone comparison > Poco F7 vs IQOO Neo 10 (Global) – which one to choose?

Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)

76 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco F7
VS
78 out of 100
Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
Xiaomi Poco F7
Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)

Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Poco F7 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on June 24, 2025, against the Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global), which is powered by the same chip. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments (11)

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
Reasons to consider the Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 90W)
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco F7 and Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
75.0
(Good)
Value Index
139.0
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Poco F7
vs
IQOO Neo 10 (Global)

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1260 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
PPI 447 ppi 452 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-144 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1700 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3200 nits 5500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 7i Shield Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1% 89.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 100% -
PWM 240 Hz -
Response time 1 ms -
Contrast ∞ Infinity -
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.1 mm (6.42 inches) 163.72 mm (6.45 inches)
Width 77.9 mm (3.07 inches) 75.88 mm (2.99 inches)
Thickness 8.2 mm (0.32 inches) 8.09 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 215.7 g (7.61 oz) 206 g (7.27 oz)
Waterproof IP68 IP65
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Plastic
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Black, Silver Gray, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.61/5) -
Drop resistance Average (D) · 45 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
Poco F7 +1%
90.1%
IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
89.3%

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco F7 and Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Max clock 3210 MHz 3210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4		 - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 825 Adreno 825
GPU shading units 1024 1024
GPU clock 1150 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco F7 and Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Poco F7
13641
IQOO Neo 10 (Global) +36%
18518
Compute Score (GPU) 13641 18518
Single-core score 2040 2151
Multi-core score 6373 6825
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Poco F7
2263357
IQOO Neo 10 (Global) +6%
2391014
CPU 632157 674929
GPU 793892 801298
Memory 365292 381888
UX 472016 532899
Total score 2263357 2391014
Samples [170 tests] [99 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Poco F7 +57%
1688
IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
1073
Stability 83% 76%
Graphics test 13 FPS 8 FPS
Graphics score 1688 1073
3DMark Solar Bay
Poco F7 +55%
7708
IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
4971
Graphics test 29 FPS 19 FPS
Section 1 33 FPS 21 FPS
Section 2 30 FPS 19 FPS
Section 3 25 FPS 16 FPS
Graphics score 7708 4971
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Poco F7 +28%
15335
IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
11946
Web score 15597 10240
Video editing 7750 6021
Photo editing 26988 25601
Data manipulation 13734 10644
Writing score 17764 13811
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (#171st place)
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco F7
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-30 (Luis)AnTuTu 122422061
📘 2026-09-29 (Thai)AnTuTu 122603535
📘 2026-09-27 (Thai)AnTuTu 122562298
📘 2026-09-22 (Deff)AnTuTu 122452982
📘 2026-09-08 (Semechka)AnTuTu 122437593
Add View all (205)
Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global)
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-24 (heytempl)AnTuTu 112391065
📘 2026-09-22 (SEMTEX)AnTuTu 112483733
📘 2026-09-05 (diesel)AnTuTu 112360168
📘 2026-09-04 (D1saver)AnTuTu 112328560
📘 2026-08-20 (z2z3x5)AnTuTu 112299804
Add View all (112)

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM HyperOS 3.0 OriginOS 6
OS size 44 GB -
OS updates 4 years -
Security updates 6 years -

Battery

Capacity 6500 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 90 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (90% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 0:39 hr -
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:24 hr -
Watching video 14:33 hr -
Gaming 07:05 hr -
Standby 130 hr -
General battery life
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 120° -
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm -
Sensor Sony IMX882 Sony LYT-600
Sensor size 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch) 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV08F -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.5
Focal length 21 mm -
Sensor Omnivision OV20B Sony IMX480
Sensor size 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) 1/3.09" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 0.7 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced June 2025 May 2025
Release date June 2025 June 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $399
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 90 W Yes, 120 W
Further details
Notes on Poco F7:
    - The Indian model has a larger battery — 7550 mAh.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global). But if the gaming, connectivity, software, design, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Poco F7.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
684 (46%)
802 (54%)
Total votes: 1486

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Xiaomi Poco F6
2. Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (6)
3. Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Xiaomi 14T (1)
4. Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Pro (5)
5. Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (6)
6. Xiaomi Poco F7 vs Honor 400
7. Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global) vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
8. Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global) vs Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (China) (5)
9. Vivo IQOO Neo 10 (Global) vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro (2)
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Viorry January 31, 2026 at 02:53 PM
If we're strictly talking about gaming performance, iQOO Neo 10 is better than Poco F7, but not by much. To break it down: 1. 12GB RAM vs 16GB RAM might seems like a lot, but in actual practical use there's rarely anything that will use your entire RAM if it's over 8GB. So 12 vs 16 is actually not much of a difference, unlike 8GB vs 12GB. RAM type matters more than actual RAM size in this context, and both phones has the same type 2. Both phones use the same chipset, Snapdragon 8s gen 4. But iQOO has a dedicated "co-processor" they call Supercomputing Chip Q1. Which gives more features for gaming such as frame interpolation and some other things. This is iQOO strongest advantage against Poco, IMO, if you're strictly talking gaming here 3. iQOO Neo 10 have bigger battery size, and bigger charging wattage, hence faster charging time 4. iQOO have better cooling, therefore better performance since the CPU won't be throttled as often because of the heat That's about it. I won't talk about camera since I'm sure people comparing these 2 phones aren't looking for the camera, and I don't really understand camera lol But everything else, Poco have it better IMO. 1. Better build (metal frame and glass back) vs plastic. Therefore better heat dissipation ESPECIALLY if you're planning to use a phone cooler. Not to mention, it's just feels nicer to hold a metal phone compared to plastic 2. Better bluetooth version (v6.0), meaning better compabilities with wireless headphones, headsets, and other peripherals and such 3. Most importantly, better price Personally, the price difference between iQOO and Poco is a dealbreaker for me. The difference alone is enough for me to get extra accessories such as a controller and a cooler to go along with Poco. And while it's true that Xiaomi OS is more prone to ads, there are a lot of debloater/software/guide out there to disable them and make the phone runs smoother. So it's Poco for me Still, if you don't care about any of that and just want to get the best of the two phone for gaming, I recommend iQOO
+12 Reply
Avatar
Emperor January 8, 2026 at 06:10 AM
Poco F7 has 7550 mAH battery not 6500
+5 Reply
Avatar
Oookkkkkk June 2, 2026 at 06:44 PM
Just the Indian version
0 Reply
Avatar
Emperor January 8, 2026 at 06:07 AM
Price difference is huge. Iqoo Neo 10 costs 1.3 times of the price of Poco F7.
+5 Reply
Avatar
HellNa November 27, 2025 at 11:42 AM
I guess it has to be F7, price wise, 12/512gb poco are cheaper than neo 10 12/512, build quality wise? Speakers, Frame, Backdoor, even the Ingress protection, Poco wins easily, as F7 uses metal frame with glass back, not to mention it also have an ip68 certification, if you mention the Ui/Os, im very agree that HyperOs is very bad in terms of optimization, though its very customizable it also introduces ads, well i guess ads are just a small price for the phone doesnt it. For Neo 10 ofc it has to be its ui, and also will receive Origin Os update soon (one of the best android ui imo), the battery is 7000mah, and the ui are very optimized and nice (Though neo 10 thermal threshold arent as high as F7) 7K VC, 7K mah battery, i guess thats it? Cmiiw, its just my opinion
+15 Reply
Avatar
Techno October 25, 2025 at 08:40 AM
I Have I Qoo Neo 10 But I think 🤔 Poco F7 Better Then iQOO NEO 10
+55 Reply
Avatar
Someone September 3, 2025 at 04:00 AM
My favorite cellphone = iQOO Neo 10🥰🥰
+20 Reply
Avatar
Big Black N-word August 30, 2025 at 05:36 PM
Bullshit 🤬.... Love Poco phones but let's call a spade a flipping spade here 🤷🏿‍♂️... Iqoo has more gaming features and more (actual) in game optimizations than Poco F7... I mean come on 😒... Gaming & overall performance wise iqoo neo 10 while premium build, flagship feel & everything else in my opinion ESPECIALLY OS cause hyper OS is well optimized on most flagship/near flagship Poco phones than origin OS on iqoo neo 10 🤓☝️
+18 Reply
Avatar
Syed yaqub June 25, 2025 at 09:01 AM
Both have same chip set but why nano review has mentioned Poco f7 mid range while iqoo flagship
+55 Reply
Avatar
Priyam June 26, 2025 at 06:16 AM
A flagship phone is defined by its overall quality — including fast charging, high-performance chipset, premium build (with better thermal management), cleaner software with minimal bloatware, and superior camera performance. It’s also reflected in the base variant’s price. While both phones may share the same chipset, the Poco F7 has poor thermal performance, excessive bloatware, and an average camera. In contrast, iQOO offers a more balanced experience expected from a flagship. If a brand claims to make a performance-centric phone, they should ensure efficient thermal design and optimize power consumption — since poor power management leads to faster battery drain and overheating. No hate intended — I just shared a genuine perspective. Hope it helps! 😊
+40 Reply
Avatar
TechforValueEnjoyer June 24, 2025 at 02:54 PM
Finally,thr battle of flagship killer have arrive!I think poco f7 is slightly better though,but we doesnt know it full potential yet,wait a month
+62 Reply
EnglishРусский