Home > Smartphone comparison > Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Note 60 Ultra – which one to choose?

Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Infinix Note 60 Ultra

85 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max
VS
78 out of 100
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max
Infinix Note 60 Ultra

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500s) that was released on January 29, 2026, against the Infinix Note 60 Ultra, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate and came out 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery life
  6. Camera
  7. Comments

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • Comes with 2000 mAh larger battery capacity: 9000 vs 7000 mAh
  • 56% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3100K versus 1989K)
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 77% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2877 and 1624 points
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 60 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 3.5x optical zoom
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Infinix Note 60 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Phone:
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
vs
Note 60 Ultra

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.78 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1208 x 2644 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 447 ppi 429 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness - 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Screen-to-body ratio 90.2% 90.1%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Peak brightness test (auto)

Design and build

Height 162.9 mm (6.41 inches) 162.37 mm (6.39 inches)
Width 77.93 mm (3.07 inches) 77.17 mm (3.04 inches)
Thickness 8.15 mm (0.32 inches) 7.9 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 220 g (7.76 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP64
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Blue, Orange Black, Silver, Blue, Red
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Infinix Note 60 Ultra
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500s MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate
Max clock 3730 MHz 3250 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925		 - 4 cores at 2.1 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 1 core at 3.25 GHz: Cortex-A725
L3 cache 12 MB 6 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU MediaTek NPU 880
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Mali-G720 MP7
GPU shading units 1536 896
GPU clock 1612 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~2329.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Infinix Note 60 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Redmi Turbo 5 Max +105%
24941
Note 60 Ultra
12192
Compute Score (GPU) 24941 12192
Single-core score 2877 1624
Multi-core score 9236 6706
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Redmi Turbo 5 Max +56%
3100039
Note 60 Ultra
1989585
CPU 923416 614651
GPU 1068085 651828
Memory 433276 301044
UX 675262 422062
Total score 3100039 1989585
Samples [16 tests] Less than 3
Submit your benchmark results

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-19 (NAIM KHAN)AnTuTu 123115755
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-18 (Naim)AnTuTu 122872829
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 (srxftwd)AnTuTu 112983608
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-26 (mehdiafkhamipour)AnTuTu 112901493
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (Nobody)AnTuTu 112903108
Add View all (21)
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
No benchmark results yet
Add

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 3.0 XOS 16
OS updates - 3 years
Security updates - 5 years

Battery

Capacity 9000 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (56% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 18 min)
Full charging time 1:00 hr 0:48 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 13:13 hr
Watching video - 20:00 hr
Gaming - 08:26 hr
Standby - 99 hr
General battery life
Add your battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 -
Zoom Digital Optical, 3.5x
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens - 112Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 8 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.7
Focal length 26 mm 23 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-600 Samsung
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) 1/1.4" (β‰ˆ 0.71 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron 0.56 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.9
Focal length - 80 mm
Sensor size - 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 15 mm 15 mm
Sensor - GalaxyCore GC08A8
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.14 micron 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length 25 mm -
Sensor - CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes No

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced January 2026 March 2026
Release date January 2026 April 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $399 -
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint		 - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
13 (68.4%)
6 (31.6%)
Total votes: 19

Related comparisons

1. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Huawei Nova 15 Pro
2. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Honor Win
3. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Vivo T4 Ultra
4. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Pro
5. Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
6. Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Infinix GT 30 Pro (1)
7. Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Infinix Note 60 Pro
8. Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
9. Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro Plus 5G
10. Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Z11x
Compare other phones (860+)

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
EnglishРусский