Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max vs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro

Here we compared two mid-range smartphones: the 6.83-inch Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max (with MediaTek Dimensity 9500s) that was released on January 29, 2026, against the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max
  • Comes with 2000 mAh larger battery capacity: 9000 vs 7000 mAh
  • Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • 32% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3100K versus 2341K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
  • Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
  • 39% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2877 and 2068 points
  • The phone is 6 months newer

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
141.6
(Excellent)
Value Index
132.7
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.83 inches 6.8 inches
Resolution 1280 x 2772 pixels 1280 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.5:9
PPI 447 ppi 453 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 1600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 3500 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision No
Touch sampling rate 480 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass AGC DT-Star D+
Screen-to-body ratio 90.2% 90.3%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming

Design and build

Height 162.9 mm (6.41 inches) 162.8 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 77.93 mm (3.07 inches) 77.2 mm (3.04 inches)
Thickness 8.15 mm (0.32 inches) 8.3 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 219 g (7.72 oz) 208 g (7.34 oz)
Waterproof IP69 IP69
Advanced cooling Vapor chamber Active fan
Rear material Glass -
Frame material Metal Plastic
Colors White, Black, Blue, Orange Black, Silver, Purple
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Max clock 3730 MHz 3210 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925
- 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 825
GPU shading units 1536 1024
GPU clock 1612 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~2355.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max and Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
24941
Compute Score (GPU) 24941 13041
Single-core score 2877 2068
Multi-core score 9236 6385
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3100039
2341700
CPU 923416 711180
GPU 1068085 825194
Memory 433276 301194
UX 675262 504132
Total score 3100039 2341700
Samples [16 tests] [25 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 64%
Graphics test - 13 FPS
Graphics score - 1790
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 32 FPS
Section 1 - 35 FPS
Section 2 - 32 FPS
Section 3 - 27 FPS
Graphics score - 8293
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 18096
Video editing - 7532
Photo editing - 26855
Data manipulation - 14510
Writing score - 21062
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (82nd and 175th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 (srxftwd)AnTuTu2983608
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-26 (mehdiafkhamipour)AnTuTu2901493
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-19 (Nobody)AnTuTu2903108
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (amogussam1)AnTuTu2811519
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (EJ)AnTuTu3158192
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-27 (Dhdhd)AnTuTu2519399
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-21 (Dice Morgan)AnTuTu2348057
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 (EXILER)AnTuTu2319105
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-03 -> Tushar_dmrcAnTuTu2323613
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-22 (Mr Rahman)AnTuTu2376220

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock - 4800 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15
ROM HyperOS 3.0 ColorOS 15

Battery

Capacity 9000 mAh 7000 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 80 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes -
Fast charging Yes (56% in 30 min) Yes (63% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:00 hr 0:56 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash Dual LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (1080p) 120 FPS (1080p)
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.5 f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm 27 mm
Sensor Sony LYT-600 -
Sensor size 1/1.95" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch) -
Pixel size 0.8 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP -
Aperture f/2.2 -
Focal length 15 mm -
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.14 micron -
Stabilization Digital -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 20 megapixels 16 megapixels
Image resolution 5184 x 3888 4920 x 3264
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.4
Focal length 25 mm 22 mm
Sensor - CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 0.7 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced January 2026 July 2025
Release date January 2026 July 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $359
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 100 W Yes, 80 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Turbo 5 Max is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
29 (78.4%)
8 (21.6%)
Total votes: 37

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!