ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 13

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on November 13, 2024, against the Vivo iQOO 13, which is powered by the same chip. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
  • Comes with 900 mAh larger battery capacity: 7050 vs 6150 mAh
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 13
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • The rear camera has a 2x optical zoom
  • Shows 7% longer battery life (30:28 vs 28:35 hours)
  • Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
  • Delivers 13% higher peak brightness (1818 against 1608 nits)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • 18% higher pixel density (510 vs 431 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K

Review

Evaluation of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro and Vivo iQOO 13 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
54.7
(Average)
Value Index
62.1
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.85 inches 6.82 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2688 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 431 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (1-144 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 4500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 960 Hz 360 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass Schott Xensation Alpha
Screen-to-body ratio 91.1% 89.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Peak brightness test (auto)
iQOO 13 +13%
1818 nits

Design and build

Height 163.42 mm (6.43 inches) 163.37 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 76.14 mm (3 inches) 76.71 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 8.13 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 229 g (8.08 oz) 213 g (7.51 oz)
Waterproof No IP69
Advanced cooling Active fan Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Silver White, Black, Silver, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.64/5) -
Drop resistance Good (C) · 90 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro and Vivo iQOO 13
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4320 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro and Vivo iQOO 13
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 24877 24763
Single-core score 3042 3008
Multi-core score 9377 9297
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3150555
CPU 989054 903944
GPU 1141247 1153744
Memory 441194 415491
UX 720602 677376
Total score 3292097 3150555
Samples [10 tests] [33 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 77%
Graphics test - 19 FPS
Graphics score - 2509
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 44 FPS
Section 1 - 49 FPS
Section 2 - 44 FPS
Section 3 - 37 FPS
Graphics score - 11463
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Graphics test - 37 FPS
Graphics score - 6250
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 14234
Video editing - 6801
Photo editing - 39527
Data manipulation - 13253
Writing score - 20704
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (60th and 79th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-19 (Nettzy)AnTuTu 123489328
📘 2026-06-07 (Nhatajkys)AnTuTu 113418489
📘 2026-05-02 (Ao Haimiya)AnTuTu 113330988
📘 2026-04-29 (ZeNn1X)AnTuTu 113199560
📘 2026-01-14 (SSupreme)AnTuTu 113320025
Vivo iQOO 13
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-25 (Asuna)AnTuTu 113203192
📘 2026-09-24 (Fenix)AnTuTu 123343403
📘 2026-08-15 (Kh)AnTuTu 113166164
📘 2026-08-03 (ShiNo_Maebure)AnTuTu 113090760
📘 2026-07-08 (Edward)AnTuTu 113239284

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM Redmagic OS 10 Funtouch 16
OS updates 3 years 4 years
Security updates 3 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 7050 mAh 6150 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes (91% in 30 min) Yes (91% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:35 hr 0:32 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:38 hr 14:22 hr
Watching video 14:39 hr 17:57 hr
Gaming 09:17 hr 08:12 hr
Standby 144 hr 129 hr
General battery life
iQOO 13 +7%
30:28 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Optical, 2x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 960 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 122° 119°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 50 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.9
Focal length 18 mm 23 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/1.9
Focal length - 50 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX816
Sensor size - 1/2.51" (≈ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length - 15 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50D40 Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Sensor Omnivision OV02F10 -
Sensor size 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.75 micron -
Stabilization No -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length - 28 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV16E1Q GalaxyCore GC32E1
Sensor size 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced November 2024 October 2024
Release date December 2024 November 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $650
Successor - ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro - Vivo iQOO 15
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Yes, 120 W
Further details
Notes on iQOO 13:
    - Only the 16/512 GB variant has UFS 4.1 storage; the rest use UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display, camera, battery life, software, and design are more important to you, then choose the Vivo iQOO 13. But if the sound is more of a priority – go for the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
77 (26.3%)
216 (73.7%)
Total votes: 293

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!