ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite) that was released on November 13, 2024, against the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra, which is powered by the same chip and came out 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
  • Comes with 1750 mAh larger battery capacity: 7050 vs 5300 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Shows 9% longer battery life (28:35 vs 26:17 hours)
  • 10% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3042 and 2753 points
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • The rear camera has a 2.5x optical zoom
  • Handles wireless charging up to 50W
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • 22% higher pixel density (526 vs 431 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)
  • Reverse charging feature
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology

Review

Evaluation of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
54.7
(Average)
Value Index
59.4
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.85 inches 6.67 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2688 pixels 1440 x 3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
PPI 431 ppi 526 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 1800 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 3200 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 960 Hz 480 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass Poco Shield Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 91.1% 89.4%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.3%
PWM - 120 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.42 mm (6.43 inches) 160.26 mm (6.31 inches)
Width 76.14 mm (3 inches) 74.95 mm (2.95 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 8.39 mm (0.33 inches)
Weight 229 g (8.08 oz) 212 g (7.48 oz)
Waterproof No IP68
Advanced cooling Active fan Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors White, Black, Silver Black, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability Average (2.64/5) Average (2.61/5)
Drop resistance Good (C) · 90 drops Average (D) · 45 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4320 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 8 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1100 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 24877 16908
Single-core score 3042 2753
Multi-core score 9377 8410
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 989054 876139
GPU 1141247 1135602
Memory 441194 434324
UX 720602 614928
Total score 3292097 3060993
Samples [10 tests] [10 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 77%
Graphics test - 16 FPS
Graphics score - 2190
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 38 FPS
Section 1 - 43 FPS
Section 2 - 39 FPS
Section 3 - 33 FPS
Graphics score - 10116
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 22176
Video editing - 8080
Photo editing - 36202
Data manipulation - 18123
Writing score - 23212
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (60th and 99th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-19 (Nettzy)AnTuTu 123489328
📘 2026-06-07 (Nhatajkys)AnTuTu 113418489
📘 2026-05-02 (Ao Haimiya)AnTuTu 113330988
📘 2026-04-29 (ZeNn1X)AnTuTu 113199560
📘 2026-01-14 (SSupreme)AnTuTu 113320025
Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-23 (Yunon)AnTuTu 113042275
📘 2026-09-14 (LocDoge)AnTuTu 123269338
📘 2026-09-09 (Yunon)AnTuTu 123213348
📘 2026-09-09 (Yunon)AnTuTu 123118621
📘 2026-08-31 (CarlosSM)AnTuTu 113250834

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM Redmagic OS 10 HyperOS 3.0
OS size - 33 GB
OS updates 3 years 4 years
Security updates 3 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 7050 mAh 5300 mAh
Max charge power 100 W 120 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging No Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes (91% in 30 min) Yes (60% in 15 min)
Full charging time 0:35 hr 0:30 hr
Battery cycles 1200 cycles 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 11:38 hr 11:39 hr
Watching video 14:39 hr 14:46 hr
Gaming 09:17 hr 05:50 hr
Standby 144 hr 124 hr
General battery life
28:35 hr
26:17 hr
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (76th and 129th place)

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Optical, 2.5x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 24FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 1920 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 122° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 50 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 32 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.6
Focal length 18 mm 24 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 OmniVision OVX8000
Sensor size 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.0
Focal length - 60 mm
Sensor - Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size - 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 32 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 15 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV50D40 Samsung S5KKD1
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Sensor Omnivision OV02F10 -
Sensor size 1/5" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.75 micron -
Stabilization No -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length - 24 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV16E1Q Samsung S5KKD1
Sensor size 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/3.42" (≈ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced November 2024 March 2025
Release date December 2024 April 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $649 $649
Successor - ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro - Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display, camera, software, design, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra. But if the gaming and battery life are more of a priority – go for the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 10 Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
41 (48.2%)
44 (51.8%)
Total votes: 85

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Xoooooooo April 26, 2025 at 10:56 AM
GuYz I can't seem to decide what to pick this is soo hard Redmagic kinda cool tho
0 Reply
Avatar
Bimo xyu July 27, 2025 at 02:54 PM
I'am too Redmagic so cool
0 Reply