ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro Plus vs Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro Plus (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on October 17, 2025, against the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max, which is powered by Apple A19 Pro and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro Plus
  • Comes with 2412 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 5088 mAh
  • 64% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4244K versus 2590K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 40W)
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
  • The rear camera has a 4x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 10% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3940 and 3596 points
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro Plus and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
10.8
(Bad)
Value Index
39.5
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED OLED
Size 6.85 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2688 pixels 1320 x 2868 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 431 ppi 460 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 2000 nits 3000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 1600 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 960 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Ceramic Shield 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90.4% 91.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.9%
PWM - 240 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.82 mm (6.45 inches) 163.4 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 76.54 mm (3.01 inches) 78 mm (3.07 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 8.75 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 230 g (8.11 oz) 233 g (8.22 oz)
Waterproof IPX8 IP68
Advanced cooling Active fan Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver Silver, Blue, Orange
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display No
Repairability - Good (3.04/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) · 180 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro Plus and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Apple A19 Pro
Max clock 4600 MHz 4260 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 6 (2 + 4)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz:
- 2 cores at 4.26 GHz:
L3 cache 12 MB -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Apple Neural Engine
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 6 core Apple GPU
GPU shading units 1536 768
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1620 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~2488.3 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro Plus and Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 28316 46450
Single-core score 3596 3940
Multi-core score 12013 10434
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 1483159 788283
GPU 1363094 922741
Memory 541927 226010
UX 856329 653533
Total score 4244509 2590567
Samples [4 tests] [14 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 76%
Graphics test - 18 FPS
Graphics score - 2487
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 42 FPS
Section 1 - 47 FPS
Section 2 - 42 FPS
Section 3 - 36 FPS
Graphics score - 10999
Sources: 3DMark [5]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-07-12 (KaiJun)AnTuTu 114244509
📘 2026-06-30 (Anonym)AnTuTu 114042770
📘 2026-03-19 (qBick)AnTuTu 114150972
📘 2026-01-08 (Alexander)AnTuTu 114372440
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-21 (Md.Imran Shafiq)AnTuTu 112602137
📘 2026-07-31 (xon1005)Geekbench 6 CPU4028 / 10579
📘 2026-06-15 (Domi)AnTuTu 112427596
📘 2026-06-09 (Cristiano)AnTuTu 112258714
📘 2026-05-29 (Joker)AnTuTu 112433128

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 NVMe
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 iOS 26 (Can be upgraded to iOS 26.5)
ROM Redmagic OS 11 -
OS size - 20 GB
OS updates - 7 years
Security updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7500 mAh 5088 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 40 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (80 W) Yes (25 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes Yes (65% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 1:12 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 12:36 hr
Watching video - 22:25 hr
Gaming - 08:17 hr
Standby - 154 hr
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 48 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8064 x 6048
Zoom Digital Optical, 4x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 122° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 50 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 48 MP
2) Telephoto: 48 MP
3) Ultrawide: 48 MP
4) Depth
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.78
Focal length - 24 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 Sony IMX903
Sensor size 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) 1/1.28" (≈ 0.78 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.22 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 48 MP
Aperture - f/2.8
Focal length - 100 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX973
Sensor size - 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size - 0.7 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 48 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Focal length - 13 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 Sony IMX972
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.55" (≈ 0.39 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 -
Stabilization No -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 18 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 4896 x 3672
Aperture f/2.0 f/1.9
Focal length - 20 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV16E1Q Sony IMX914
Sensor size 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Optical
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No Yes

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 -
Type of SIM card Nano eSIM
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced October 2025 September 2025
Release date October 2025 September 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $780 $1199
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Face recognition sensor
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Not included
Further details
Notes on iPhone 17 Pro Max:
    - Battery is 5,088 mAh on the eSIM-only model (vs 4,832 mAh on the Nano SIM + eSIM version).
    - The Chinese model alone includes dual Nano SIM slots and 15 W wireless charging.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max. It has a better camera, connectivity, software, design, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
255 (77%)
76 (23%)
Total votes: 331

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Azathoth13 October 20, 2025 at 10:04 PM
Hands down ZTE is overall better phone especially you playing games and also it's cheaper
+15 Reply
Avatar
Haha February 16, 2026 at 05:38 AM
Agreed, your comment correct 200%
0 Reply