ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
87
out of 100
VS
89
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on November 3, 2025, against the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max, which is powered by the same chip and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
- The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- Slow-motion recording at 960FPS
- Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.85 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2688 pixels | 1200 x 2608 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 431 ppi | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | - |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 3500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 960 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 91.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.82 mm (6.45 inches) | 163.33 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 76.54 mm (3.01 inches) | 77.82 mm (3.06 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) | 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Waterproof | IPX8 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Active fan | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | - |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Silver | White, Black, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max clock | 4600 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 28503 | 27658 |
| Single-core score | 3693 | 3687 |
| Multi-core score | 11818 | 11219 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1193059 | 1131610 |
| GPU | 1514949 | 1407372 |
| Memory | 507882 | 516269 |
| UX | 901348 | 842570 |
| Total score | 4117238 | 3897821 |
| Samples | [16 tests] | [3 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | - | 78% |
| Graphics test | - | 19 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 2613 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | - | 47 FPS |
| Section 1 | - | 54 FPS |
| Section 2 | - | 47 FPS |
| Section 3 | - | 39 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 12330 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | - | 38 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 6490 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 15760 |
| Video editing | - | 8107 |
| Photo editing | - | 35534 |
| Data manipulation | - | 18051 |
| Writing score | - | 23843 |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (23rd and 36th place)
Recent User Tests
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-21 (ΠΠ½Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΉ) | AnTuTu 11 | 4084489 |
| π 2026-06-04 (Stefan) | AnTuTu 11 | 4138157 |
| π 2026-04-09 (Winex) | AnTuTu 11 | 3844423 |
| π 2026-04-01 (Ckima) | AnTuTu 11 | 4092254 |
| π 2026-03-30 (ΠΠ½Π΄ΡΠ΅ΠΉ) | AnTuTu 11 | 4117238 |
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-20 (Max) | AnTuTu 11 | 4119955 |
| π 2026-09-03 (Xioami) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3713 / 11324 |
| π 2026-09-03 (DARK) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3760 / 11149 |
| π 2026-08-18 (Xiaomi User) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3685 / 11205 |
| π 2026-08-17 (WoW !!) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 3676 / 11184 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | Redmagic OS 11 | HyperOS 3 |
| OS updates | 3 years | - |
| Security updates | 3 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 7500 mAh | 7560 mAh |
| Max charge power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging | Yes (80 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (71% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 0:55 hr | - |
| Web browsing | 14:36 hr | - |
| Watching video | 24:02 hr | - |
| Gaming | 09:01 hr | - |
| Standby | 136 hr | - |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#21st place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 960 FPS (1080p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 122Β° | 102Β° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 50 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 18 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50E40 | Omnivision Light Hunter 950 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.55" (β 0.65 inch) | 1/1.31" (β 0.76 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/3.0 |
| Focal length | - | 115 mm |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50E40 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.88" (β 0.35 inch) | 1/2.88" (β 0.35 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 0.61 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 2 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | - |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV02F10 | - |
| Stabilization | No | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 16 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4608 x 3456 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV16E1Q | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8" (β 0.36 inch) | 1/3.44" (β 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 2.1 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | - |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | November 2025 | October 2025 |
| Release date | November 2025 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $560 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max. It has a better camera, software, design, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 29