ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on November 3, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 10 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro
  • Comes with 2500 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Shows 18% longer battery life (33:56 vs 28:43 hours)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Delivers 37% higher peak brightness (1931 against 1413 nits)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (80W versus 45W)
  • 32% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4117K versus 3128K)
  • Has 2 SIM card slots
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • 16% higher pixel density (498 vs 431 PPI)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
70.1
(Good)
Value Index
38.2
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.85 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2688 pixels 1440 x 3120 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 431 ppi 498 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR - 2600 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 960 Hz 240 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass Corning Gorilla Armor 2
Screen-to-body ratio 90.4% 92.4%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 97.7%
PWM - 240 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
1931 nits
1413 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.82 mm (6.45 inches) 162.8 mm (6.41 inches)
Width 76.54 mm (3.01 inches) 77.6 mm (3.06 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 8.2 mm (0.32 inches)
Weight 230 g (8.11 oz) 218 g (7.69 oz)
Waterproof IPX8 IP68
Advanced cooling Active fan Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver Black, Silver, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Good (3.23/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Max clock 4600 MHz 4470 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M)
- 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L)
L3 cache 12 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3379.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 28503 26581
Single-core score 3693 3202
Multi-core score 11818 10347
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 1193059 987646
GPU 1514949 1190760
Memory 507882 362214
UX 901348 587932
Total score 4117238 3128552
Samples [16 tests] [66 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 61%
Graphics test - 17 FPS
Graphics score - 2272
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 40 FPS
Section 1 - 50 FPS
Section 2 - 40 FPS
Section 3 - 29 FPS
Graphics score - 10441
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Stability - 56%
Graphics test - 34 FPS
Graphics score - 5827
Sources: 3DMark [5]
Web score - 21582
Video editing - 8625
Photo editing - 34425
Data manipulation - 17556
Writing score - 26844
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (23rd and 86th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-21 (Андрей)AnTuTu 114084489
📘 2026-06-04 (Stefan)AnTuTu 114138157
📘 2026-04-09 (Winex)AnTuTu 113844423
📘 2026-04-01 (Ckima)AnTuTu 114092254
📘 2026-03-30 (Андрей)AnTuTu 114117238
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-29 (VortexGen)AnTuTu 123414404
📘 2026-09-06 (Trexsotiy)Battery lifeSOT 12:30 / 03:16
📘 2026-09-02 -> Mohamed_136Battery lifeSOT 8:02 / 17:11
📘 2026-08-29 (PaWK)AnTuTu 113034536
📘 2026-08-23 (Apple Slayer)AnTuTu 113254557

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM Redmagic OS 11 One UI 8.0
OS size - 30.4 GB
OS updates 3 years 7 years
Security updates 3 years 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7500 mAh 5000 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 45 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (80 W) Yes (25 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes (71% in 30 min) Yes (72% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:55 hr 0:59 hr
Battery cycles - 2000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 14:36 hr 11:10 hr
Watching video 24:02 hr 19:32 hr
Gaming 09:01 hr 06:22 hr
Standby 136 hr 132 hr
General battery life
33:56 hr
28:43 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 200 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 16320 x 12240
Zoom Digital Optical, 5x
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 120FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 240FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 122° 120°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 50 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 200 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Telephoto: 10 MP
4) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 200 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.7
Focal length 18 mm 23 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 Samsung ISOCELL S5KHP2
Sensor size 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) 1/1.3" (≈ 0.77 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.6 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Laser autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/3.4
Focal length - 111 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX854
Sensor size - 1/2.52" (≈ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size - 0.7 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/1.9
Focal length 14 mm 13 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 Samsung ISOCELL S5KJN3
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.5" (≈ 0.4 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.7 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Sensor OmniVision OV02F10 -
Stabilization No -

DxOMark main camera tests

Generic main camera score
Bokeh - 165
Preview - 81
Zoom - 137
Samples - Photo samples of Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra from DxOMark

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length 26 mm 26 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV16E1Q Samsung S5K3LU
Sensor size 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/3.2" (≈ 0.31 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.2
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced November 2025 January 2025
Release date November 2025 February 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $699 $1299
Successor - - Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
SAR (head) - 1.25 W/kg
SAR (body) - 1.42 W/kg
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Hall-effect sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Not included
Further details
Notes on Galaxy S25 Ultra:
    - Supports up to 2 eSIMs. The international model has 2 physical SIM slots, while the U.S. version has 1.
    - Uses Grade 5 titanium and Corning Gorilla Armor 2 glass on both sides.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the gaming and battery life are more important to you, then choose the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro. But if the camera, software, design, and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
58 (56.9%)
44 (43.1%)
Total votes: 102

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!