ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on May 18, 2026, against the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra, which is powered by the same chip and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 6500 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- 22% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4716K versus 3862K)
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)
- The phone is 6 months newer
- 10% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3976 and 3604 points
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
- The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.85 inches | 6.9 inches |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2688 pixels | 1200 x 2608 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| PPI | 431 ppi | 416 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 1800 nits | 2000 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | - | 3500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 960 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Poco Shield Glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4% | 91.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC Dimming |
| RGB color space | - | 99.6% |
| PWM | - | 120 Hz |
| Response time | - | 1 ms |
| Contrast | - | ∞ Infinity |
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 163.8 mm (6.45 inches) | 163.33 mm (6.43 inches) |
| Width | 76.5 mm (3.01 inches) | 77.82 mm (3.06 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) | 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| Waterproof | IPX8 | IP68 |
| Advanced cooling | Active fan | Vapor chamber |
| Rear material | Glass | - |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Silver | White, Black, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-display |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.63/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Excellent (A) · 270 drops |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max clock | 4740 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Adreno 840 | Adreno 840 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 29064 | 27501 |
| Single-core score | 3976 | 3604 |
| Multi-core score | 12511 | 10752 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 1624034 | 1113289 |
| GPU | 1520367 | 1452771 |
| Memory | 608324 | 507250 |
| UX | 963509 | 789604 |
| Total score | 4716234 | 3862914 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [36 tests] |
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (8th and 36th place)
Recent User Tests
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-25 (Hüseyn Alizade) | AnTuTu 11 | 4716234 |
| 📘 2026-08-14 (Hüseyn Alizade) | Battery life | SOT 15:48 / 30:17 |
| 📘 2026-08-14 (Hüseyn Alizade) | AnTuTu 11 | 4716234 |
| 📘 2026-08-14 (Hüseyn Alizade) | AnTuTu 11 | 4716234 |
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-27 (Johnnis) | AnTuTu 12 | 3903835 |
| 📘 2026-09-25 (Лапка) | AnTuTu 12 | 3944588 |
| 📘 2026-09-22 -> Chubzuey | AnTuTu 12 | 4214043 |
| 📘 2026-09-13 -> Chubzuey | AnTuTu 12 | 4143093 |
| 📘 2026-09-04 (Bestiqooguyidk) | AnTuTu 11 | 3812038 |
Memory
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5300 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | Redmagic OS 11.5 | HyperOS 3 |
| OS size | - | 36 GB |
| OS updates | - | 4 years |
| Security updates | - | 6 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7500 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 100 W |
| Battery type | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes (80 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes, (wireless) |
| Bypass charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (78% in 15 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 0:39 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | - | 15:14 hr |
| Watching video | - | 22:44 hr |
| Gaming | - | 08:06 hr |
| Standby | - | 124 hr |
General battery life
Smartphones With Long Battery Life (#25th place)
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 8160 x 6120 | 8192 x 6144 |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | 240 FPS (1080p) | 1920 FPS (720p) |
| Angle of widest lens | 122° | 102° |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Ultrawide: 50 MP 3) Macro: 2 MP |
1) Standard: 50 MP 2) Telephoto: 50 MP 3) Ultrawide: 50 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
- Bokeh mode - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | - | 23 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50E40 | Omnivision Light Hunter 950 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) | 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1 micron | 1.2 micron |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Image resolution | - | 50 MP |
| Aperture | - | f/3.0 |
| Focal length | - | 115 mm |
| Sensor | - | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | - | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) |
| Pixel size | - | 0.64 micron |
| Stabilization | - | Optical |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 13 mm | 18 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV50E40 | OmniVision OV50M40 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) | 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | 0.61 micron |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 2 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | - |
| Stabilization | No | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 16 megapixels | 32 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4608 x 3456 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | - | 21 mm |
| Sensor | - | OmniVision OV32D |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) | 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | 0.64 micron |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Depends on the region |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 2.1 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May 2026 | November 2025 |
| Release date | May 2026 | November 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $729 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 100 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra. It has a better camera, connectivity, software, design, and sound.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 11