ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on May 18, 2026, against the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, which is powered by the same chip and came out 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 100W)
  • 10% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3976 and 3615 points
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 3x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP69 classification)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Has 33% more RAM: 16GB versus 12GB
  • 18% higher pixel density (508 vs 431 PPI)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
16 / 256 GB

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.85 inches 6.85 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2688 pixels 1440 x 3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.8:9
PPI 431 ppi 508 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 2600 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 8000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 960 Hz 475 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.4% 90.7%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 100%
PWM - 120 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.8 mm (6.45 inches) 163.65 mm (6.44 inches)
Width 76.5 mm (3.01 inches) 76.8 mm (3.02 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 8.7 mm (0.34 inches)
Weight 230 g (8.11 oz) 227 g (8.01 oz)
Waterproof IPX8 IP69
Advanced cooling Active fan Active fan
Rear material Glass Glass
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver Black, Silver
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 4740 MHz 4610 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 29064 27924
Single-core score 3976 3615
Multi-core score 12511 11366
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 1624034 1102292
GPU 1520367 1604604
Memory 608324 789150
UX 963509 1106244
Total score 4716234 4602290
Samples [2 tests] [3 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 68%
Graphics test - 23 FPS
Graphics score - 3081
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 54 FPS
Section 1 - 60 FPS
Section 2 - 55 FPS
Section 3 - 46 FPS
Graphics score - 14183
Sources: 3DMark [5]
Web score - 18545
Video editing - 6849
Photo editing - 34832
Data manipulation - 14303
Writing score - 28711
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (8th and 12th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro Plus
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-25 (Hüseyn Alizade)AnTuTu 114716234
📘 2026-08-14 (Hüseyn Alizade)Battery lifeSOT 15:48 / 30:17
📘 2026-08-14 (Hüseyn Alizade)AnTuTu 114716234
📘 2026-08-14 (Hüseyn Alizade)AnTuTu 114716234
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-30 (NPT)Geekbench 6 CPU3568 / 11293
📘 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv)AnTuTu 114602290
📘 2026-04-04 (Khamidovv)AnTuTu 114651882
📘 2026-02-08 (z strikes again)AnTuTu 114314224

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 16 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM Redmagic OS 11.5 OriginOS 6
OS size - 96 GB
OS updates - 5 years
Security updates - 5 years

Battery

Capacity 7500 mAh 7400 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (80 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes (50% in 24 min)
Full charging time - 1:06 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 240 FPS (1080p)
Angle of widest lens 122° 107°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 50 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.9
Focal length - 23 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 Sony IMX921
Sensor size 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) 1/1.56" (≈ 0.64 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/2.7
Focal length - 85 mm
Sensor - Sony IMX882
Sensor size - 1/1.95" (≈ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size - 0.8 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.1
Focal length 13 mm 15 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 -
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.64 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Stabilization No -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 6528 x 4896
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length - 21 mm
Sensor - CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.8" (≈ 0.36 inch) 1/3.1" (≈ 0.32 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 0.7 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced May 2026 February 2026
Release date May 2026 February 2026
Launch price (MSRP) - $849
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These smartphones have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra. It has a better display, camera, connectivity, design, and sound.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
28 (26.9%)
76 (73.1%)
Total votes: 104

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!