ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro vs Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra

Here we compared two flagship smartphones: the 6.85-inch ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5) that was released on May 18, 2026, against the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra, which is powered by the same chip and came out 6 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone
Reasons to consider the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro
  • Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 7500 vs 6500 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • 21% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (4678K versus 3862K)
  • The phone is 6 months newer
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
  • The rear camera has a 5x optical zoom
  • Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • Slow-motion recording at 1920FPS
  • Supports higher wattage charging (100W versus 80W)
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro and Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB
61.7
(Average)
Value Index
47.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.85 inches 6.9 inches
Resolution 1216 x 2688 pixels 1200 x 2608 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
PPI 431 ppi 416 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 1800 nits 2000 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 3500 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 960 Hz 480 Hz
Screen protection Tempered glass Poco Shield Glass
Screen-to-body ratio 90.4% 91.9%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
- DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.6%
PWM - 120 Hz
Response time - 1 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 163.8 mm (6.45 inches) 163.33 mm (6.43 inches)
Width 76.5 mm (3.01 inches) 77.82 mm (3.06 inches)
Thickness 8.9 mm (0.35 inches) 7.9 mm (0.31 inches)
Weight 230 g (8.11 oz) 218 g (7.69 oz)
Waterproof IPX8 IP68
Advanced cooling Active fan Vapor chamber
Rear material Glass -
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver White, Black, Blue
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display Yes, in-display
Repairability - Average (2.63/5)
Drop resistance - Excellent (A) · 270 drops
Screen-to-body ratio

Performance

Chipset specifications of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro and Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 4740 MHz 4600 MHz
CPU cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache 12 MB 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 840 Adreno 840
GPU shading units 1536 1536
GPU clock 1300 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro and Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 29783 27501
Single-core score 3777 3604
Multi-core score 11522 10752
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
3862914
CPU 1580346 1113289
GPU 1573646 1452771
Memory 587926 507250
UX 936551 789604
Total score 4678468 3862914
Samples [3 tests] [36 tests]
AnTuTu 11 Ranking List (11th and 36th place)

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-08-24 (q_l8)AnTuTu 114202139
📘 2026-08-17 (Hüseyn Alizade)AnTuTu 114678468
📘 2026-08-16 (Hüseyn Alizade)AnTuTu 114678468
📘 2026-08-16 (Hüseyn Alizade)CPU Throttle99%
📘 2026-07-25 (Thuong)Geekbench 6 GPU28675
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-09-27 (Johnnis)AnTuTu 123903835
📘 2026-09-25 (Лапка)AnTuTu 123944588
📘 2026-09-22 -> ChubzueyAnTuTu 124214043
📘 2026-09-13 -> ChubzueyAnTuTu 124143093
📘 2026-09-04 (Bestiqooguyidk)AnTuTu 113812038

Memory

RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 5300 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 16 Android 16
ROM Redmagic OS 11.5 HyperOS 3
OS size - 36 GB
OS updates 3 years 4 years
Security updates 5 years 6 years

Battery

Capacity 7500 mAh 6500 mAh
Max charge power 80 W 100 W
Battery type Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging Yes (80 W) Yes (50 W)
Reverse charging Yes Yes, (wireless)
Bypass charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes Yes (78% in 15 min)
Full charging time - 0:39 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 15:14 hr
Watching video - 22:44 hr
Gaming - 08:06 hr
Standby - 124 hr
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8160 x 6120 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital Optical, 5x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 240 FPS (1080p) 1920 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 122° 102°
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 50 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Telephoto: 50 MP
3) Ultrawide: 50 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/1.9 f/1.7
Focal length - 23 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50A Omnivision Light Hunter 950
Sensor size 1/1.55" (≈ 0.65 inch) 1/1.31" (≈ 0.76 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 1.2 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization Optical Optical
Telephoto lens
Image resolution - 50 MP
Aperture - f/3.0
Focal length - 115 mm
Sensor - Samsung S5KJN5
Sensor size - 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size - 0.64 micron
Stabilization - Optical
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 50 MP 50 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.4
Focal length 13 mm 18 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV50E40 OmniVision OV50M40
Sensor size 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch) 1/2.88" (≈ 0.35 inch)
Pixel size 0.61 micron 0.61 micron
Stabilization Digital Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP -
Aperture f/2.4 -
Stabilization No -

Selfie camera

Megapixels 16 megapixels 32 megapixels
Image resolution 4608 x 3456 -
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length - 21 mm
Sensor Omnivision OV16A1Q OmniVision OV32D
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) 1/3.44" (≈ 0.29 inch)
Pixel size 1 micron 0.64 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
NFC* Yes Depends on the region
Infrared port Yes Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 2 2
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby Standby
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo 2.1
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos No Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced May 2026 November 2025
Release date June 2026 November 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $799 $729
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 80 W Yes, 100 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, connectivity, software, design, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra. But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11S Pro.

Cast your vote

So, which phone would you choose?
6 (40%)
9 (60%)
Total votes: 15

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!