Samsung Galaxy A13

Samsung Galaxy A13
  • Screen: 6.6" PLS TFT - 1080 x 2408
  • SoC: Samsung Exynos 850
  • Camera: 4 (50 MP + 5 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP)
  • Battery: 5000 mAh
  • OS: Android 14
  • Weight: 195 grams (6.88 oz)
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance more precisely
Memory:

Review

Display
49
Camera
47*
Performance
19
Gaming
15
Battery
60
Connectivity
56
NanoReview Score
42*
Scores marked with a red asterisk (*) are approximate, as we currently do not have sufficient test results to make a precise estimation.
Compare Samsung Galaxy A13 with other phones

Full specifications

Detailed specifications, tests, and benchmarks of the Samsung Galaxy A13

Display

Type PLS TFT
Size 6.6 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2408 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9
PPI 400 ppi
Refresh rate 60 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No
Max rated brightness 500 nits
HDR support No
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Screen-to-body ratio 83.4%
Display tests
RGB color space 99.9%
PWM Not detected
Response time 33 ms
Contrast 1257:1
Peak brightness test (auto)
582 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 165.1 mm (6.5 inches)
Width 76.4 mm (3.01 inches)
Thickness 8.8 mm (0.35 inches)
Weight 195 g (6.88 oz)
Waterproof No
Rear material Plastic
Frame material Plastic
Colors White, Black, Blue, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button
Screen-to-body ratio
83.4%

Performance

Chipset specifications of the Samsung Galaxy A13
SoC
Chipset Samsung Exynos 850
Max clock 2000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (8)
Architecture - 8 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
Manufacturing Samsung
Lithography process 8 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) No
GPU
Graphics Mali-G52
GPU shading units 16
GPU clock 1001 MHz
FLOPS ~48 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark results of the Samsung Galaxy A13
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
474
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
1523
Single-core score 474
Multi-core score 1523
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
231906
CPU 87523
GPU 17669
Memory 86552
UX 40162
Total score 231906
PCMark 3.0
4777
Web score 4792
Video editing 4695
Photo editing 7885
Data manipulation 3252
Writing score 4111

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-25 (stockman50)AnTuTu 11266604
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-30 (SamsungPro)CPU Throttle95%
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-29 (SamsungPro)CPU Throttle94%
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 -> Viljami22CPU Throttle91%
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 -> Viljami22AnTuTu 11231833
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-11 (SamsungPro)AnTuTu 11234594
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-11 (SamsungPro)AnTuTu 11234594
πŸ“˜ 2025-11-09 -> Viljami22AnTuTu 11222612

Memory

RAM
RAM size 3 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz
Channels 2
Storage
Storage size 32 GB
Storage type eMMC 5.1
Memory card MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 12 (Can be upgraded to Android 14)
ROM One UI Core 6.1
OS size 16.5 GB
OS updates 2 years
Security updates 3 years

Battery

Capacity 5000 mAh
Max charge power 15 W
Battery type Li-Ion
Replaceable No
Wireless charging No
Reverse charging No
Fast charging Yes (27% in 30 min)
Full charging time 2:18 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:52 hr
Watching video 13:18 hr
Gaming 05:46 hr
Standby 127 hr
General battery life
23:56 hr

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels
Image resolution 8192 x 6144
Zoom Digital
Flash LED
Stabilization Digital
8K video recording No
4K video recording No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
2) Ultrawide: 5 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
4) Depth: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP
Aperture f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 0.64 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 5 MP
Aperture f/2.2
Sensor size 1/5" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP
Aperture f/2.4
Stabilization Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.2
Sensor CMOS
Autofocus No
Stabilization Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5
Bluetooth features PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP
USB type USB Type-C
USB version 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
NFC* Depends on the region
Infrared port No
Network
Number of SIM* 2
Type of SIM card Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby
eSIM support* No
LTE Cat* 7
2G network GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900
3G network UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900)
4G network LTE B1(2100), B2(1900), B3(1800), B4(AWS), B5(850), B7(2600), B12(700), B13(700), B20(800), B25(1900), B26(850), B29(700), B30(2300), B66(AWS-3), B71(600)
5G support No

Sound

Speakers Mono
Headphone audio jack Yes
FM radio No
Dolby Atmos Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
83.3 dB

Other

Category Budget
Announced March 2022
Release date March 2022
Launch price (MSRP) $189
Successor - Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
SAR (head) 0.37 W/kg
SAR (body) 1.39 W/kg
Sensors - Accelerometer
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 15 W
*Disclaimer! Some specifications of the Galaxy A13 may differ by country or region

Comments (9)

🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Mohammed Amin January 17, 2025 at 12:17 PM
How to call record A13
0 Reply
Avatar
Chickenandtechlover August 31, 2024 at 12:49 PM
I've used the samsung A13 for a while now, and let me tell you, it sucks. You can barely game on it. The performance is really bad for anything gaming related. Geometry dash? 30 fps with lag stutters. Codm? 30 fps low settings if you want no stutters. Roblox? 90% of the time unplayable... Not to mention, it loads apps VERY slowly. Like painfully slow. I don't really know what fast feels like since I haven't had a better phone than a budget yet, but I know it is really slow. Sometimes it even STUTTERS when loading apps. Very bad. I have a different phone from a year ago, a xiaomi redmi 10C, and it preforms better. And i mean WAY better. 5gb of ram and a good processor, the snapdragon 680 (from memory, might not be true.) slightly worse camera and a worse display for a way smoother experience and actually able to play most games in 60 fps, except some roblox games. I suggest not buying this phone at ALL and going for a different phone. Find the right specs, or just dont go with samsung for they're very budget phones. Normally they suck, but just make sure to do your own research. This phone is bad, but future phones are probably better. The A55 is still a great phone, so don't think worse about the other A series phones just because a budget phone is bad. Do your research, see what you want to use it for and then buy whichever fits it perfectly. (Review is done, this is me just yapping about how good the samsung tablets are for value and performance) I'm gonna buy a tab A9+ very soon, not waiting for 2 months or longer for the A10 series. I've had multiple times the next generation of budget devices is worse than the one before, so I'm not risking it and buying one when they are still on sale at the current moment. If your interested, they cost around 230, have a really good processor, decent display, decent camera, and a beautiful 90 hertz display. Way more value than phones. If you like gaming a lot or drawing, buyba samsung tablet instead. Really good value for the price. Just know the normal A tablet will have a worse processor, screen and camera than the A+. The extra money for the A+ series is worth it, in my opinion.
+3 Reply
Avatar
shohabmsk December 28, 2023 at 06:40 AM
This phone is a disappointment. It's the worst phone I've bought given the amount I spent on it - it's only 32-bit! There isn't even a proximity sensor! Both the auto-brightness feature and the ear call function are done by the front camera, and they're incredibly buggy. Moreover, the display causes eye strain. The colors come off looking like they're in an oil painting! The user interface is consistently laggy, as is the multitasking function, and it's largely unresponsive. Samsung's native sound system gives me a headache, so I removed it with the Narsil mod. Additionally, the audio latency is far too substantial, even for the primary output! It's upwards of 80+ ms, which is considerably more than what other phones in the same price range offer. In summary, this device doesn't even qualify as a low-range phone; it's more akin to the lowest range phones I've ever used. Even the 100-dollar local phones from my country are smoother, with the bonus of a Sony camera sensor built in!
+1 Reply
Avatar
Random May 1, 2024 at 07:25 AM
The CPU supports 64-bit, but Samsung insists on 32-bit! I really don't understand the reasoning behind this decision. They are just losing customers because of it.
+1 Reply
Avatar
Unknown April 14, 2023 at 08:27 AM
I've had a Samsung Galaxy A13 5G for 3 years now, and let me tell you, it sucks. I hate this terrible phone. Why do I still have it? Why don't I upgrade? It's because I can't afford it. It really sucks for me.
+14 Reply
Avatar
shohabmsk December 28, 2023 at 06:34 AM
I have this phone too. It's terrible! It's the worst phone I've ever accidentally bought, and it also cost a lot.
+3 Reply
Avatar
bruh May 6, 2024 at 09:19 AM
How? Release date March 2022 14 April 2023 08:27: I've had a Samsung Galaxy A13 5G for 3 years now
+1 Reply
Avatar
Daniel Gavrielov August 13, 2024 at 08:51 AM
bruh, LOL YEAH, maybe he is a time traveler 🀭
0 Reply
Avatar
Mike January 14, 2023 at 11:34 AM
I have the Galaxy A13 4G. It is buggy and slow. It will not charge on my car charger but will charge on some car chargers. My car charger does work for other phones just not the A13 so WTH? On a clear sunny day if I try to take a photo or video in landscape mode the screen blacks out. The photo or video will turn out OK but you can not see what you are shooting so again WTH? I have already returned one phone with the same issues it was replaced with a new one that has the same issues. Not good enough SAMSUNG.
+12 Reply