ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7

ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7
  • Screen: 6.8" AMOLED - 1080 x 2400
  • SoC: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  • Camera: 3 (64 MP + 8 MP + 2 MP)
  • Battery: 4500 mAh
  • OS: Android 12
  • Weight: 215 grams (7.58 oz)
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance more precisely
Memory:

Review

Display
72
Camera
57*
Performance
58
Gaming
35
Battery
52
Connectivity
73
NanoReview Score
58*
Scores marked with a red asterisk (*) are approximate, as we currently do not have sufficient test results to make a precise estimation.
Compare ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7 with other phones

Full specifications

Detailed specifications, tests, and benchmarks of the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7

Display

Type AMOLED
Size 6.8 inches
Resolution 1080 x 2400 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9
PPI 387 ppi
Refresh rate 165 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No
Max rated brightness 530 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 700 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10+
Touch sampling rate 720 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Screen-to-body ratio 83.6%
Display features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 98.5%
PWM 729 Hz
Response time 1 ms
Contrast ∞ Infinity
Peak brightness test (auto)
688 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 170.5 mm (6.71 inches)
Width 78.3 mm (3.08 inches)
Thickness 9.5 mm (0.37 inches)
Weight 215 g (7.58 oz)
Waterproof No
Advanced cooling Active fan
Rear material Glass
Frame material Metal
Colors Black
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-display
Screen-to-body ratio
83.6%

Performance

Chipset specifications of the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Max clock 3000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A710
- 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X2
L3 cache 6 MB
Manufacturing Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 730
GPU shading units 1024
GPU clock 818 MHz
FLOPS ~1675.3 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark results of the ZTE Nubia Red Magic 7
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1625
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
4319
Single-core score 1625
Multi-core score 4319
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1384444
CPU 498235
GPU 225137
Memory 230031
UX 431041
Total score 1384444

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-16 (WheelieMave)AnTuTu 111384444

Memory

RAM
RAM size 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5
Memory clock 2750 MHz
Channels 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1
Memory card No

Software

Operating system Android 12
ROM Redmagic 5.0
OS size 21 GB

Battery

Capacity 4500 mAh
Max charge power 65 W
Battery type Li-Ion
Replaceable No
Wireless charging No
Reverse charging No
Fast charging Yes (99% in 30 min)
Full charging time 0:38 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 06:29 hr
Watching video 10:09 hr
Gaming 04:30 hr
Standby 91 hr
General battery life
17:32 hr

Main camera

Matrix 64 megapixels
Image resolution 9000 x 7000
Zoom Digital
Flash LED
Stabilization Digital
8K video recording Up to 30FPS
4K video recording Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS
Slow motion 960 FPS (720p)
Angle of widest lens 120Β°
Lenses 1) Standard: 64 MP
2) Ultrawide: 8 MP
3) Macro: 2 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Standard lens
Image resolution 64 MP
Aperture f/1.8
Focal length 26 mm
Sensor Samsung GW3
Sensor size 1/1.97" (β‰ˆ 0.51 inch)
Pixel size 0.8 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital
Ultra-wide lens
Image resolution 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0
Focal length 13 mm
Sensor Hynix HI-846
Sensor size 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron
Stabilization Digital
Macro lens
Image resolution 2 MP
Aperture f/2.4
Sensor Omnivision OV02A10
Sensor size 1/2.8" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch)
Pixel size 1.75 micron
Stabilization Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.0
Sensor CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron
Autofocus No
Stabilization Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2
Bluetooth features LE, A2DP
USB type USB Type-C
USB version 3.0
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes
GPS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS
NFC* Yes
Infrared port No
Network
Number of SIM* 2
Type of SIM card Nano
Multi SIM mode Standby
eSIM support* No
Hybrid slot No
LTE Cat* 20
2G network GSM 2/3/5/8
3G network WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19
4G network LTE B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28A/B66
5G support Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo
Headphone audio jack Yes
FM radio No
Speakers test
Max loudness
91.8 dB

Other

Category Flagship
Announced February 2022
Release date February 2022
Launch price (MSRP) $629
Successor - ZTE Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro
Sensors - Barometer
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 65 W
*Disclaimer! Some specifications of the Nubia Red Magic 7 may differ by country or region

Comments (3)

🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
... April 5, 2022 at 10:03 AM
Why does Galaxy S22 Ultra score lower than another phone with the same chip?
0 Reply
Avatar
Catalin April 19, 2022 at 12:20 AM
The ZTE Nubia Redmagic 7 also has a built-in cooling fan clocking at 20000 rpm to cool the CPU down which def helps. Its maxed display is also Full HD, not quad-HD which uses less power I'm assuming. Plus it is a gaming phone I'm sure it's been tweaked to squeeze everything out of the CPU.
+7 Reply
Avatar
RiggedBeast December 16, 2024 at 01:55 AM
Don't just call RedMagic "than just another phone", its a premium gaming phone brand known worldwide to be a phone that always pushes all CPU+GPU power to the max with very good cooling/sustained performance. Your poor Samsung is just no longer innovating enough and just relying on CPU throttling to not overheat. It's also there fault why Snapdragon 888 and 8Gen1 overheats due to their faulty and poor manufacturing compared to TSMC.
0 Reply