Kirin 820 vs Kirin 710

We compared two 8-core processors: HiSilicon Kirin 820 (with Mali-G57 MP6 graphics) and Kirin 710 (Mali-G51 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 820
  • Performs 5.1x better in floating-point computations
  • Shows significantly better (up to 81%) AnTuTu 11 score – 610K vs 336K
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 12 nm)
  • 7% higher CPU clock speed (2360 vs 2200 MHz)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 710
  • Higher GPU frequency (~18%)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Kirin 820 +81%
610097
336905
CPU 251791 149801
GPU 86005 23442
Memory 129622 78854
UX 142679 84808
Total score 610097 336905
Samples Less than 3 [11 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Kirin 820 +131%
836
362
Multi-Core Score
Kirin 820 +101%
2458
1222
Asset compression 130.6 MB/sec 76.5 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 53.6 pages/sec 41.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 86 Mpixels/sec 44.9 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 44.6 images/sec 12.9 images/sec
HDR 76.2 Mpixels/sec 44.8 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 9.31 images/sec 1.85 images/sec
Photo processing 22.4 images/sec 10.2 images/sec
Ray tracing 3.76 Mpixels/sec 2.08 Mpixels/sec
Samples 2 tests 4 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 820 +487%
2839
484
Background blur 4.31 images/sec 1.56 images/sec
Face detection 2.11 images/sec 0.95 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.05 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.07 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.14 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.01 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 8.71 Gpixels/sec 3.27 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 527.6 FPS 143.5 FPS
API OpenCL OpenCL
Samples 2 tests 3 tests

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
n/a
6543
Web score - 5937
Video editing score - 4886
Data manipulation score - 5530
Photo editing score - 11098
Writing score - 6649
Phones tested - 3 models

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 58 FPS
[Low]
51 FPS
[Medium]
Call of Duty: Mobile 41 FPS
[Ultra]
29 FPS
[Low]
Fortnite 27 FPS
[Low]
25 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 56 FPS
[Low]
World of Tanks Blitz 48 FPS
[Ultra]
52 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 33 FPS
[Medium]
-
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 57 FPS
[Ultra]
60 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Huawei Honor X10
1080 x 2400
Huawei Honor 10 Lite
1080 x 2340
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
HiSilicon Kirin 820
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-07 (Mohammad El PHANTOM)AnTuTu610097
πŸ“˜ 2024-03-22 (Hexo)GeekBench GPU2263
πŸ“˜ 2024-03-22 (Hexo)GeekBench CPU836 / 2458
πŸ“˜ 2023-11-14 (Florin)GeekBench CPU828 / 2475
πŸ“˜ 2023-11-14 (Florin)GeekBench GPU2839
HiSilicon Kirin 710
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-16 (ᢀᡃᡐH.D.H7)AnTuTu356350
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Daryn)AnTuTu307195
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-20 (Zephy)AnTuTu337060
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-13 (Flarbo)AnTuTu329479
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-02 (Vite180)AnTuTu324696

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Kirin 820 and Kirin 710

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2360 MHz 2200 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
L1 cache - 256 KB
L2 cache - 512 KB
L3 cache - 1 MB
Process 7 nanometers 12 nanometers
Transistor count - 5.5 billion
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 5 W 5 W
Manufacturing - TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP6 Mali-G51 MP4
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Bifrost 1st gen
GPU frequency 850 MHz 1000 MHz
Pipelines 6 4
Shading units 32 8
Total shaders 192 32
FLOPS 326.4 Gigaflops 64 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Yes No

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Max bandwidth 31.78 Gb/s -
Max size 12 GB 6 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 3360 x 1440 2340 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Balong 5000 -
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 12
5G support Yes No
Download speed Up to 4600 Mbps Up to 600 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 150 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 4
Bluetooth 5.1 4.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo

Info

Announced March 2020 July 2018
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number - Hi6260
Official page - HiSilicon Kirin 710 official site
Successor - - HiSilicon Kirin 820

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 710 and Kirin 820, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!