Kirin 9035 vs Kirin 9025

We compared the 9-core HiSilicon Kirin 9035 (Maleoon 935) with the newer 8-core Kirin 9025 (Maleoon 920) SoC. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9035
  • Has a smaller size transistor (5 versus 7 nm)
  • Shows better (up to 37%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1811K vs 1325K
  • Has 1 more cores
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2850 vs 2600 MHz)
  • Supports 13% higher memory bandwidth (76.8 against 68.2 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Kirin 9035 +37%
1811490
1325732
CPU 541759 370183
GPU 508312 295489
Memory 453112 434593
UX 308307 225467
Total score 1811490 1325732
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
1398
1420
Multi-Core Score
Kirin 9035 +31%
5510
4199
Compute Score (GPU)

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Kirin 9035 and Kirin 9025

CPU

Architecture 1x 2.85 GHz –
4x 2.27 GHz –
4x 1.72 GHz –
1x 2.6 GHz – TaiShan V121
3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan V120
4x 1.6 GHz – Taishan-Little
Cores 9 8
Frequency 2850 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8-A
L2 cache - 1 MB
L3 cache - 10 MB
Process 5 nanometers 7 nanometers
Manufacturing SMIC SMIC

Graphics

GPU name Maleoon 935 Maleoon 920
Architecture Maleoon Maleoon
Pipelines 6 4
Shading units 256 256
Total shaders 1536 1024
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 3.0
DirectX version 12 12

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci Da Vinci

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 4800 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 76.8 Gb/s 68.2 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 4.0, UFS 4.1 UFS 4.0
Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Balong 6000 Balong 6000
4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 7500 Mbps Up to 7500 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 3500 Mbps Up to 3500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 7 7
Bluetooth 6.0 5.4
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced October 2026 October 2026
Class Flagship Mid range
Model number - Hi36C0V110

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1 (100%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: 1

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 9025 and Kirin 9035, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!