Dimensity 7300 vs Dimensity 7050

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (with Mali-G615 MP2 graphics) and Dimensity 7050 (Mali-G68 MP4). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7300
  • Performs 2.2x better in floating-point computations
  • Has a smaller size transistor (4 versus 6 nm)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~10%)
  • Shows better (up to 9%) AnTuTu 11 score – 879K vs 806K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
879714
CPU 320191 310680
GPU 128437 80663
Memory 164451 176922
UX 266635 237747
Total score 879714 806012
Samples [311 tests] [29 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 166 MB/sec 117.2 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 68.3 pages/sec 61.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 114.8 Mpixels/sec 88 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 53.4 images/sec 44.8 images/sec
HDR 102.1 Mpixels/sec 76.7 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 10.7 images/sec 6.71 images/sec
Photo processing 25.8 images/sec 21.3 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.62 Mpixels/sec 3.21 Mpixels/sec
Samples 49 tests 18 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 4.57 images/sec 3.79 images/sec
Face detection 2.52 images/sec 1.88 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.1 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.17 Gpixels/sec 0.19 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.11 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.25 Gpixels/sec 7.13 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 439.4 FPS 393.6 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 40 tests 7 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 346 233
Stability 98% 97%
Graphics test 3 FPS 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
13626
Web score 13221 9630
Video editing score 6420 5765
Data manipulation score 9644 8000
Photo editing score 35886 28539
Writing score 16658 15985
Phones tested 22 models 5 models

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 7300
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-02 (Антон)AnTuTu 121010952
πŸ“˜ 2026-10-01 (Chelik)AnTuTu 121005243
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Keyn)AnTuTu 12994900
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (АлСксСй)AnTuTu 12898347
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-30 (Fabricy)Geekbench 7 GPU2511
MediaTek Dimensity 7050
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-26 (Thun)AnTuTu 12874833
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-25 (Jedrick)AnTuTu 11843534
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-16 (MymySupremacy)AnTuTu 11839005
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-02 (Arda1)AnTuTu 11874742
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-18 (Thun)AnTuTu 11823369

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 7300 and Dimensity 7050

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2500 MHz 2600 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 4 MB -
Process 4 nanometers 6 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W 4 W
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G615 MP2 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture Valhall 4rd gen Valhall 2nd gen
GPU frequency 1047 MHz 950 MHz
Pipelines 2 4
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 128
FLOPS 536.1 Gigaflops 243.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 3.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 655 MediaTek APU 550

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G support - LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3270 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.2
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced June 2024 May 2023
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6878 MT6878V/ZA MT6878V_A/ZA MT6877, MT6877V/TTZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 7300 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7050 official site
Successor - MediaTek Dimensity 7400 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
1063 (76.8%)
322 (23.2%)
Total votes: 1385

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7050 and Dimensity 7300, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Mitch January 17, 2026 at 12:29 PM
Wish they upgrade G99 with 4xA76 cores and 4xG68 cores
0 Reply
Avatar
Ally June 14, 2025 at 04:36 PM
The D7300 kicks the D7050 on the ass on the power consumption alone. And the main difference between the D7300 and the 7050 is that the D7300 uses 4+4 cluster rather than 2+6. The GPU while it's just a 2 core for the D7300 it still kicks it's ass due to newer architecture and smaller process node that's the reason why it was still able to beat the 4core mali G68
+19 Reply
Avatar
Aakash Kumar Sah August 4, 2024 at 05:37 AM
There are 4 big A78 core and to handle it efficiently they reduce the clock speed by 0.1 Ghz. Despite reducing the clock speed you can see better single core performance. NPU is also upgraded.
+32 Reply
Avatar
Aakash Kumar Sah August 4, 2024 at 05:30 AM
They have upgrade from 2 *A78 Core to 4*A78 core and they also upgraded GPU with new architecture and 4nm performance node. 4nm 2.5Ghz 4*A78 is better and faster than 6nm 2.6Ghz 2*A78. So we can get more performance at similar prices
+15 Reply
Avatar
King Miracle. July 9, 2024 at 02:36 PM
They're literally the same chip with a newer GPU, and a 0.1gHz CPU clock boost.
+31 Reply
Avatar
Ankush Tomar July 13, 2024 at 07:46 AM
0.1Ghz CPU underclock*
+22 Reply
Avatar
Haris Khan November 25, 2024 at 03:29 PM
With more cores being a78 rather than a55 and based on 4nm, I am using a device with this 7300 and the low power is amazing for this device, a decent package for an affordable battery oriented device it is despite lacking powerful X cores of high end chipsets
+9 Reply