Dimensity 7360 vs Dimensity 7350

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7360 (with Mali-G615 MP2 graphics) and Dimensity 7350 (). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7350
  • 20% higher CPU clock speed (3000 vs 2500 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~24%)
  • Performs 24% better in floating-point computations
  • Better instruction set architecture
  • Shows better (up to 12%) AnTuTu 11 score – 1037K vs 925K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
1037391
CPU 329195 384931
GPU 123225 175276
Memory 201306 172317
UX 271683 304876
Total score 925409 1037391
Samples [23 tests] [9 tests]

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 151.1 MB/sec 174.7 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 69.8 pages/sec 66.4 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 123 Mpixels/sec 125.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 55.3 images/sec 54.9 images/sec
HDR 94.2 Mpixels/sec 104.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 8.91 images/sec 10.8 images/sec
Photo processing 27.5 images/sec 26.7 images/sec
Ray tracing 4.06 Mpixels/sec 4.65 Mpixels/sec
Samples 2 tests 3 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 4.7 images/sec 4.1 images/sec
Face detection 2.54 images/sec 2.73 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.18 Gpixels/sec 0.27 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.12 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.04 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 4.28 Gpixels/sec 8.08 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 442.2 FPS 691.3 FPS
API Vulkan Vulkan
Samples 2 tests 3 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Score 343 528
Stability - 98%
Graphics test 3 FPS 4 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 9715 -
Video editing score 5376 -
Data manipulation score 8280 -
Photo editing score 20140 -
Writing score 15297 -
Phones tested Less than 3 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 7360
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-05 (rafxz)AnTuTu 11923163
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (Vee957)AnTuTu 11933084
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-17 (Ijoi)AnTuTu 11949226
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-11 (tuannguyen)AnTuTu 11920896
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 (Saito Akio)AnTuTu 11938373
MediaTek Dimensity 7350
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (Thien)CPU Throttle90%
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (Thien)Geekbench 6 GPU3734
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (Thien)Geekbench 6 CPU1175 / 2663
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-12 (Thien)AnTuTu 111061670
πŸ“˜ 2026-05-24 (Sean)AnTuTu 11825586

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 7360 and Dimensity 7350

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
2x 3 GHz – Cortex-A715
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2500 MHz 3000 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
L1 cache 512 KB 512 KB
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 4 W -
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G615 MP2 -
Architecture Valhall 4rd gen -
GPU frequency 1047 MHz 1300 MHz
Pipelines 2 -
Shading units 128 -
Total shaders 256 -
FLOPS 536.1 Gigaflops 665.6 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 -
OpenCL version 3.0 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 655 MediaTek APU 657

Memory

Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 25.6 Gb/s 25.6 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

4G support - LTE Cat. 21
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 3270 Mbps Up to 4700 Mbps
Upload speed - Up to 2500 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 6
Bluetooth 5.4 5.3
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC

Info

Announced September 2025 July 2024
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6878V MT6886V/TCZA
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 7360 official site MediaTek Dimensity 7350 official site

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
26 (31.7%)
56 (68.3%)
Total votes: 82

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 7350 and Dimensity 7360, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
Anonymous June 19, 2026 at 03:31 AM
The only thing better with Mtk 7360πŸ€₯ is better multi core performance though it's architecture is less efficient..... and more efficient GPU thanks to new architecture..... though... I have to may Mtk 7350's G610 4 core GPU is definitely more powerful and CPU is more efficient......I mean seriously mediatekπŸ€₯.... upgrade downgrade everything together πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«....πŸ˜πŸ˜’
0 Reply
Avatar
TfMediatek April 21, 2026 at 04:11 PM
Mediatek's naming will ALWAYS baffle me 7350 is better than 7200, which is SOMEHOW better than 7360 which is same as 7300? What???
+2 Reply
SkyFX March 25, 2026 at 05:05 AM
Is MediaTek for real? The 7360 is a downgrade in every single way. 7360 A78/A55 (2020) vs. 7350 A715/A510 (2022). 7360 is not even more efficient nor powerful. It doesn't do a single thing better (I guess Bluetooth... God what an insane breakthrough! 5.4?!?! WHAT A STEAL! This is even worse than doing a refresh with the same performance.
0 Reply