Dimensity 820 vs Kirin 820

We compared two 8-core processors: MediaTek Dimensity 820 (with Mali-G57 MP5 graphics) and HiSilicon Kirin 820 (Mali-G57 MP6). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 820
  • 10% higher CPU clock speed (2600 vs 2360 MHz)
  • Higher GPU frequency (~6%)
  • Better instruction set architecture
Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 820
  • Supports 86% higher memory bandwidth (31.78 against 17.07 GB/s)

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
609659
610097
CPU 230405 251791
GPU 101179 86005
Memory 101782 129622
UX 176293 142679
Total score 609659 610097
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Kirin 820 +6%
2458
Asset compression 107 MB/sec 130.6 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 59.9 pages/sec 53.6 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 95.3 Mpixels/sec 86 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 40.7 images/sec 44.6 images/sec
HDR 68.7 Mpixels/sec 76.2 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 7.49 images/sec 9.31 images/sec
Photo processing 20.4 images/sec 22.4 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.79 Mpixels/sec 3.76 Mpixels/sec
Samples Less than 3 2 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Kirin 820 +1%
2839
Background blur 4.22 images/sec 4.31 images/sec
Face detection 2.29 images/sec 2.11 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.13 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.22 Gpixels/sec 0.18 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.13 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.03 Gpixels/sec 0.03 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 8.16 Gpixels/sec 8.71 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 442.2 FPS 527.6 FPS
API Vulkan OpenCL
Samples Less than 3 2 tests

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score 716 -
Stability 97% -
Graphics test 4 FPS -

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score 6330 -
Video editing score 5973 -
Data manipulation score 7518 -
Photo editing score 21803 -
Writing score 9823 -

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile 46 FPS
[Ultra]
58 FPS
[Low]
Call of Duty: Mobile 41 FPS
[Medium]
41 FPS
[Ultra]
Fortnite 28 FPS
[Low]
27 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends 52 FPS
[Ultra]
-
World of Tanks Blitz 55 FPS
[Ultra]
48 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact 35 FPS
[Ultra]
33 FPS
[Medium]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang 58 FPS
[Ultra]
57 FPS
[Ultra]
Device Xiaomi Redmi 10X Pro
1080 x 2400
Huawei Honor X10
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
MediaTek Dimensity 820
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-01-01 (Xi Anzing)Geekbench 6 GPU2799
πŸ“˜ 2025-01-01 (Xi Anzing)Geekbench 6 CPU839 / 2312
HiSilicon Kirin 820
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-07 (Mohammad El PHANTOM)AnTuTu 11610097
πŸ“˜ 2024-03-22 (Hexo)Geekbench 6 GPU2263
πŸ“˜ 2024-03-22 (Hexo)Geekbench 6 CPU836 / 2458
πŸ“˜ 2023-11-14 (Florin)Geekbench 6 CPU828 / 2475
πŸ“˜ 2023-11-14 (Florin)Geekbench 6 GPU2839

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Dimensity 820 and Kirin 820

CPU

Architecture 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2600 MHz 2360 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
L1 cache 512 KB -
L2 cache 1 MB -
L3 cache 2 MB -
Process 7 nanometers 7 nanometers
TDP (Sustained Power Limit) 8 W 5 W
Manufacturing TSMC -

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G57 MP5 Mali-G57 MP6
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 900 MHz 850 MHz
Pipelines 5 6
Shading units 32 32
Total shaders 160 192
FLOPS 288 Gigaflops 326.4 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Yes
NPU theoretical performance 2.4 TOPS -

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 17.07 Gb/s 31.78 Gb/s
Max size 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3360 x 1440
Max camera resolution 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem - Balong 5000
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2770 Mbps Up to 4600 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 1250 Mbps -
Wi-Fi 5 6
Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou

Info

Announced May 2020 March 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number MT6875 -
Official page MediaTek Dimensity 820 official site -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
241 (53.2%)
212 (46.8%)
Total votes: 453

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Kirin 820 and Dimensity 820, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
wangmingZ August 3, 2024 at 02:43 PM
KIRIN820 is the best for D8205G,GPU
0 Reply