Snapdragon 690 vs Dimensity 800U

We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 800U (Mali-G57 MP3). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

Review

General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score

Key Differences

Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
  • Performs 77% better in floating-point computations
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 800U
  • Higher GPU frequency (~50%)
  • 20% higher CPU clock speed (2400 vs 2000 MHz)
  • Has a smaller size transistor (7 versus 8 nm)
  • Supports 15% higher memory bandwidth (17.07 against 14.9 GB/s)
  • Shows slightly better (up to 13%) AnTuTu 11 score – 562K vs 499K

Benchmarks

Performance tests in popular benchmarks

AnTuTu 11

The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
562447
CPU 205382 214860
GPU 52431 60564
Memory 78632 124551
UX 162595 162472
Total score 499040 562447
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3

GeekBench 6

The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Asset compression 96.3 MB/sec 98.1 MB/sec
HTML 5 Browser 50.2 pages/sec 49.2 pages/sec
PDF Renderer 65 Mpixels/sec 56.6 Mpixels/sec
Image detection 38 images/sec 36.8 images/sec
HDR 59.1 Mpixels/sec 59.3 Mpixels/sec
Background blur 5.13 images/sec 5.26 images/sec
Photo processing 16.3 images/sec 11 images/sec
Ray tracing 2.8 Mpixels/sec 2.64 Mpixels/sec
Samples 2 tests 45 tests
Compute Score (GPU)
Background blur 1.52 images/sec 2.93 images/sec
Face detection 0.64 images/sec 1.5 images/sec
Horizon detection 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Edge detection 0.07 Gpixels/sec 0.14 Gpixels/sec
Gaussian blur 0.05 Gpixels/sec 0.08 Gpixels/sec
Feature matching 0.01 Gpixels/sec 0.02 Gpixels/sec
Stereo matching 2.92 Gpixels/sec 5.33 Gpixels/sec
Particle physics 165.3 FPS 302.6 FPS
API OpenCL Vulkan
Samples 2 tests -

3DMark

A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Score - 475
Stability - 99%
Graphics test - 2 FPS

PCMark 3.0

Benchmark for evaluating overall system performance in everyday workloads
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 5081
Video editing score - 5544
Data manipulation score - 7073
Photo editing score - 13097
Writing score - 7692

Gaming

Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
PUBG Mobile - 44 FPS
[Ultra]
Call of Duty: Mobile - 47 FPS
[Medium]
Fortnite - 28 FPS
[Low]
Shadowgun Legends - 39 FPS
[Ultra]
World of Tanks Blitz - 51 FPS
[Ultra]
Genshin Impact - 35 FPS
[Low]
Mobile Legends: Bang Bang - 55 FPS
[Ultra]
Device - Oppo Realme 7 5G
1080 x 2400
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2024-10-07 (HXR)Geekbench 6 GPU966
πŸ“˜ 2024-10-07 (HXR)Geekbench 6 CPU780 / 1897
MediaTek Dimensity 800U
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-09 (Biki)AnTuTu 11562447

Specifications

Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 690 and Dimensity 800U

CPU

Architecture 2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77)
6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55)
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Cores 8 8
Frequency 2000 MHz 2400 MHz
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process 8 nanometers 7 nanometers
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC

Graphics

GPU name Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP3
Architecture Adreno 600 Valhall 1st gen
GPU frequency 565 MHz 850 MHz
Pipelines 2 3
Shading units 128 32
Total shaders 256 96
FLOPS 289.3 Gigaflops 163.2 Gigaflops
Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
DirectX version 12.1 -

AI Accelerator

Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 692 MediaTek APU 3.0
NPU theoretical performance 5 TOPS 2.4 TOPS

Memory

Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1866 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Max bandwidth 14.9 Gb/s 17.07 Gb/s
Max size 8 GB 16 GB

Multimedia (ISP)

Storage type eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0 UFS 2.2
Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
Max camera resolution 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 20MP
Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC LC
- FLAC
- HE-AACv1
- HE-AACv2
- MP3

Connectivity

Modem Snapdragon X51 -
4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
5G support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2500 Mbps Up to 2770 Mbps
Upload speed Up to 900 Mbps Up to 1250 Mbps
Wi-Fi 6 5
Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS

Info

Announced June 2020 August 2020
Class Mid range Mid range
Model number SM6350 MT6853T
Official page Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 official site MediaTek Dimensity 800U official site
Successor - Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 -

Cast your vote

So, which SoC would you choose?
129 (35.9%)
230 (64.1%)
Total votes: 359

Comments

Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 800U and Snapdragon 690, or ask any questions
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
hasaki March 3, 2025 at 02:01 PM
i like snap 690 because it have wifi 6 wifi 6 will connect farther than wifi 5
0 Reply