Honor Pad 10 vs Honor MagicPad 2 12.3

67 out of 100
Honor Pad 10
VS
68 out of 100
Honor MagicPad 2 12.3

Here we compared two tablets: the 12.1-inch Honor Pad 10 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3) that was released on May 22, 2025, against the Honor MagicPad 2 12.3, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 and came out 10 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory 8 / 256 GB

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Honor MagicPad 2 12.3
  • 71% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1795K versus 1048K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Supports higher wattage charging (66W versus 35W)
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • 16% higher pixel density (290 vs 249 PPI)
  • OLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
  • Thinner bezels – 5.5% more screen real estate
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 74% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2004 and 1150 points

Review

Evaluation of Honor Pad 10 and MagicPad 2 12.3 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
74.7
(Good)
Value Index
39.0
(Mediocre)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
vs

Display

Type IPS LCD OLED
Size 12.1 inches 12.3 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 1920 x 3000 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 3:2
PPI 249 ppi 290 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (60-144 Hz)
Max rated brightness - 650 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR - 1600 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, HDR10
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 85.4% 90.9%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space - 98.4%
PWM - 90 Hz
Response time - 5 ms
Contrast - ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
MagicPad 2 12.3
12.3″ (3:2 ratio) = 69.8 in2
Pad 10
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
~6% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
n/a
691 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 277.1 mm (10.91 inches) 274.5 mm (10.81 inches)
Width 179.3 mm (7.06 inches) 180.5 mm (7.11 inches)
Thickness 6.3 mm (0.25 inches) 5.8 mm (0.23 inches)
Weight 525 g (18.52 oz) 555 g (19.58 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Blue, Green White, Black, Blue
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 497 cm2 (77 inches2) 495 cm2 (76.9 inches2)
Repairability Good (3.07/5) -
Drop resistance Bad (E) · 5 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
85.4%
90.9%
Tablet Ranking (75th and 67th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (57th and 50th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Honor Pad 10 and Honor MagicPad 2 12.3
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
Max clock 2630 MHz 3000 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)
- 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)
- 3 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 3 GHz: Cortex-X4
L3 cache 3 MB 8 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Adreno 720 Adreno 735
GPU shading units 512 768
GPU clock 975 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS ~998.4 GFLOPS ~1689.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Honor Pad 10 and Honor MagicPad 2 12.3
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1150
2004
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
3103
5461
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 4133 -
Single-core score 1150 2004
Multi-core score 3103 5461
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
1048658
1795377
CPU 379212 565484
GPU 215650 488270
Memory 198436 318468
UX 255360 423155
Total score 1048658 1795377
Samples [2 tests] [201 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability - 91%
Graphics test - 8 FPS
Graphics score - 1089
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 20 FPS
Section 1 - 23 FPS
Section 2 - 20 FPS
Section 3 - 17 FPS
Graphics score - 5148
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score - 17800
Video editing - 8040
Photo editing - 29384
Data manipulation - 13941
Writing score - 19204

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Honor Pad 10
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-06-11 (Snowmen)AnTuTu 111048658
📘 2026-05-24 (Aleks)AnTuTu 111019587
Honor MagicPad 2 12.3
No benchmark results yet

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock - 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card - No

Software

Operating system Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16)
ROM MagicOS 10 MagicOS 10
OS size - 29 GB
OS updates 0 years -

Battery

Capacity 10100 mAh 10050 mAh
Max charge power 35 W 66 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes Yes (35% in 30 min)
Full charging time - 1:46 hr
Battery cycles 1400 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 05:53 hr
Watching video - 09:22 hr
Gaming - 05:56 hr
Standby - 124 hr
General battery life
n/a
19:54 hr

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 4160 x 3120
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
-
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 9 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.3 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 -
Type of SIM card Nano No
eSIM support* No -
Hybrid slot No -
5G support Yes No

Sound

Speakers 6.0 8.0
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - No
Speakers test
Max loudness
n/a
90.3 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Flagship
Announced May 2025 July 2024
Release date May 2025 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $355 $599
Successor - - Honor MagicPad 3
Sensors - Accelerometer - Proximity sensor
- Accelerometer
Bundled charger Yes, 35 W Yes, 66 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the performance, gaming, and connectivity are more important to you, then choose the Honor MagicPad 2 12.3. But if the battery life is more of a priority – go for the Honor Pad 10.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
4 (26.7%)
11 (73.3%)
Total votes: 15

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Avatar
FZXO July 4, 2025 at 03:05 PM
The difference between them for the price difference is HUGE. If you are really on a budget, add a little money and buy a Xiaomi pad, or add twice the money for a much better experience.
0 Reply