Honor Pad X9 vs Honor Pad 9
Here we compared two tablets: the 11.5-inch Honor Pad X9 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 685) that was released on July 6, 2023, against the Honor Pad 9, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad X9
- Shows 13% longer battery life (25:36 vs 22:40 hours)
- Smaller footprint: 11% more compact case (69.3 vs 77.7 square inches)
- Weighs 56 grams less
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad 9
- Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
- 58% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (729K versus 461K)
- Comes with 1050 mAh larger battery capacity: 8300 vs 7250 mAh
- Delivers 25% higher peak brightness (566 against 451 nits)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- More recent OS version: Android 14 versus 13
- 23% higher pixel density (249 vs 203 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (35W versus 22.5W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11.5 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels | 1600 x 2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 203 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max rated brightness | 450 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 84.7% |
| RGB color space | - | 99.8% |
| PWM | - | 29480 Hz |
| Response time | - | 27 ms |
| Contrast | - | 1533:1 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 9
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Pad X9
11.5″ (5:3 ratio) = 58.3 in2
~12% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 267.3 mm (10.52 inches) | 278.27 mm (10.96 inches) |
| Width | 167.4 mm (6.59 inches) | 180.11 mm (7.09 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 499 g (17.6 oz) | 555 g (19.58 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | White, Gray, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 447 cm2 (69.3 inches2) | 501 cm2 (77.7 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (130th and 107th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (102nd and 82nd place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Max clock | 2800 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1260 MHz | 676 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~322.6 GFLOPS | ~346.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 570 | 1640 |
| Single-core score | 477 | 941 |
| Multi-core score | 1551 | 2785 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 191663 | 307398 |
| GPU | 29731 | 74347 |
| Memory | 110054 | 162679 |
| UX | 129788 | 184865 |
| Total score | 461236 | 729289 |
| Samples | [37 tests] | [47 tests] |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 8739 | - |
| Video editing | 4586 | - |
| Photo editing | 15530 | - |
| Data manipulation | 7170 | - |
| Writing score | 8896 | - |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | - |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | - |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) |
| ROM | MagicOS 7.1 | Magic OS 8 |
| OS size | - | 32 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 7250 mAh | 8300 mAh |
| Max charge power | 22.5 W | 35 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Bypass charging | No | - |
| Fast charging | Yes (34% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 40 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:04 hr | 2:05 hr |
| Web browsing | 08:56 hr | 07:22 hr |
| Watching video | 11:02 hr | 06:55 hr |
| Gaming | 07:03 hr | 05:34 hr |
| Standby | 155 hr | 157 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 5 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 2592 x 1944 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 5 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 5 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | - | C616WPU |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 2592 x 1944 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | - | C617HWK |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | - |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | July 2023 | December 2023 |
| Release date | July 2023 | December 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $230 | $350 |
| Successor | - | - Honor Pad 10 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer | - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 35 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad X9:
- The memory card slot is available only in the 4G model.
- In some European countries, the package includes a charger, while others do not.
Notes on Pad 9:
- The memory card slot is available only in the 4G model.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor Pad 9 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 89