Xiaomi Poco Pad vs Honor Pad 9

64 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad
VS
55 out of 100
Honor Pad 9

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Poco Pad (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) that was released on May 23, 2024, against the Honor Pad 9, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 and came out 5 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory 8 / 256 GB

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad
  • Comes with 1700 mAh larger battery capacity: 10000 vs 8300 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 10% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1032 and 941 points
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad 9
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco Pad and Honor Pad 9 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
77
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
46
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
39
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
16
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
91*
67
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
58
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
64*
55
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
73.8
(Good)
Value Index
46.2
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
vs

Display

Type IPS LCD TFT LCD
Size 12.1 inches 12.1 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 1600 x 2560 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
PPI 249 ppi 249 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max rated brightness 600 nits 500 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision No
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 83.4% 84.7%
Display features - DCI-P3 -
Display tests
RGB color space - 99.8%
PWM - 29480 Hz
Response time - 27 ms
Contrast - 1533:1
Peak brightness test (auto)
n/a
566 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 280 mm (11.02 inches) 278.27 mm (10.96 inches)
Width 181.85 mm (7.16 inches) 180.11 mm (7.09 inches)
Thickness 7.52 mm (0.3 inches) 6.9 mm (0.27 inches)
Weight 571 g (20.14 oz) 555 g (19.58 oz)
Waterproof - No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Blue White, Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 509 cm2 (78.9 inches2) 501 cm2 (77.7 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio
83.4%
Pad 9 +2%
84.7%
Tablet Ranking (87th and 107th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (66th and 82nd place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco Pad and Honor Pad 9
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
Max clock 2400 MHz 2200 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A78
Manufacturing Samsung Samsung
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 710 Adreno 710
GPU shading units 256 256
GPU clock 940 MHz 676 MHz
FLOPS ~481.3 GFLOPS ~346.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco Pad and Honor Pad 9
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Poco Pad +10%
1032
941
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Poco Pad +7%
2976
2785
Compute Score (GPU)
Poco Pad +41%
2314
1640
Compute Score (GPU) 2314 1640
Single-core score 1032 941
Multi-core score 2976 2785
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Poco Pad +7%
778166
729289
CPU 297225 307398
GPU 73188 74347
Memory 152467 162679
UX 255286 184865
Total score 778166 729289
Samples [2 tests] [47 tests]
PCMark 3.0
12964
n/a
Web score 13631 -
Video editing 6946 -
Photo editing 24734 -
Data manipulation 11507 -
Writing score 13590 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco Pad
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-29 (SRG)Geekbench 6 CPU1025 / 2768
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-28 (SRG)AnTuTu 11770063
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-15 (Jeff)AnTuTu 11778166
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-20 (Vxmpiri)Geekbench 6 GPU2314
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-20 (Vxmpiri)Geekbench 6 CPU1032 / 2976
Honor Pad 9
No benchmark results yet

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X -
Memory clock 2133 MHz -
Channels 2 -
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 14 Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14)
ROM HyperOS 1.0 Magic OS 8
OS size - 32 GB

Battery

Capacity 10000 mAh 8300 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 35 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (29% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 40 min)
Full charging time 2:00 hr 2:05 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 07:22 hr
Watching video - 06:55 hr
Gaming - 05:34 hr
Standby - 157 hr
General battery life
n/a
22:40 hr

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution - 4160 x 3120
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No -
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/2.0
Sensor - C616WPU
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution - 3264 x 2448
Aperture - f/2.2
Sensor CMOS C617HWK
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.1
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 1 1
Type of SIM card Nano Nano
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support Yes Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.0 8.0
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
n/a
89.1 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced May 2024 December 2023
Release date May 2024 December 2023
Launch price (MSRP) $329 $350
Successor - - Honor Pad 10
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
Bundled charger Yes, 33 W Yes, 35 W
Further details
Notes on Poco Pad:
    - The 5G model has water resistance, a 128 GB memory option, and GPS. The Wi-Fi model has none of these features.
Notes on Pad 9:
    - The memory card slot is available only in the 4G model.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco Pad is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
46 (71.9%)
18 (28.1%)
Total votes: 64

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!
Vxmpiri May 23, 2025 at 09:43 AM
I have the Poco Pad, Idk how adding info here works but if u need any samples Ill try to provide sum fr
0 Reply