Honor Pad X9 vs Honor Pad X7
Here we compared two budget tablets: the 11.5-inch Honor Pad X9 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 685) that was released on July 6, 2023, against the Honor Pad X7, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 and came out 2 years and 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad X9
- Has a 2.8 inches larger screen size
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.1)
- 16% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (461K versus 396K)
- Supports higher wattage charging (22.5W versus 10W)
- 13% higher pixel density (203 vs 179 PPI)
- 17% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 477 and 407 points
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad X7
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 13
- Much smaller footprint: 41% more compact case (40.9 vs 69.3 square inches)
- Weighs 134 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.5 inches | 8.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels | 800 x 1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 5:3 |
| PPI | 203 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | - |
| Max rated brightness | 450 nits | 625 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 81.5% |
Screen space comparison
Pad X9
11.5″ (5:3 ratio) = 58.3 in2
Pad X7
8.7″ (5:3 ratio) = 33.4 in2
~74% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 267.3 mm (10.52 inches) | 211.8 mm (8.34 inches) |
| Width | 167.4 mm (6.59 inches) | 124.8 mm (4.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) | 7.99 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 499 g (17.6 oz) | 365 g (12.87 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray | Gray |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 447 cm2 (69.3 inches2) | 264 cm2 (40.9 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (127th and 135th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (99th and 105th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Max clock | 2800 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A53 - 4 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A73 |
- 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU shading units | 128 | 128 |
| GPU clock | 1260 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~322.6 GFLOPS | ~285.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 570 | 46 |
| Single-core score | 477 | 407 |
| Multi-core score | 1551 | 1309 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 191663 | 179211 |
| GPU | 29731 | 26262 |
| Memory | 110054 | 85220 |
| UX | 129788 | 106157 |
| Total score | 461236 | 396850 |
| Samples | [37 tests] | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 8739 | - |
| Video editing | 4586 | - |
| Photo editing | 15530 | - |
| Data manipulation | 7170 | - |
| Writing score | 8896 | - |
Recent User Tests
Honor Pad X9
No benchmark results yet
Honor Pad X7
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-08-10 (Anonim) | AnTuTu | 396850 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 | Android 15 |
| ROM | MagicOS 7.1 | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 7250 mAh | 7020 mAh |
| Max charge power | 22.5 W | 10 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Bypass charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (34% in 30 min) | No |
| Full charging time | 2:04 hr | - |
| Web browsing | 08:56 hr | - |
| Watching video | 11:02 hr | - |
| Gaming | 07:03 hr | - |
| Standby | 155 hr | - |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 2592 x 1944 | - |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 5 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 2592 x 1944 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | - |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | - |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | July 2023 | July 2025 |
| Release date | July 2023 | July 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $230 | $95 |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer | - Accelerometer |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 10 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad X9:
- The memory card slot is available only in the 4G model.
- In some European countries, the package includes a charger, while others do not.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor Pad X9 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 4