Lenovo Tab M11 vs Honor Pad 10
Here we compared two tablets: the 11-inch Lenovo Tab M11 (with MediaTek Helio G88) that was released on January 9, 2024, against the Honor Pad 10, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 1 year and 5 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Lenovo Tab M11
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Thinner bezels – 8.3% more screen real estate
- Much smaller footprint: 25% more compact case (58.1 vs 77 square inches)
- Weighs 60 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad 10
- 3.1x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1048K versus 339K)
- Has a 1.1 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 3060 mAh larger battery capacity: 10100 vs 7040 mAh
- Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
- Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 13
- More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- 21% higher pixel density (249 vs 206 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (35W versus 20W)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels | 1600 x 2560 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 206 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 400 nits | - |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 93.7% | 85.4% |
| Display features | - | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.1% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 52 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1078:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad 10
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Tab M11
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~20% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 166.31 mm (6.55 inches) | 277.1 mm (10.91 inches) |
| Width | 225.26 mm (8.87 inches) | 179.3 mm (7.06 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.15 mm (0.28 inches) | 6.3 mm (0.25 inches) |
| Weight | 465 g (16.4 oz) | 525 g (18.52 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP52 | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Green | Blue, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 375 cm2 (58.1 inches2) | 497 cm2 (77 inches2) |
| Repairability | Excellent (4.03/5) | Good (3.07/5) |
| Drop resistance | Bad (E) · 1 drops | Bad (E) · 5 drops |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (136th and 75th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (106th and 57th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G88 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 2000 MHz | 2630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715) - 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715) |
| L3 cache | - | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 12 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 720 |
| GPU shading units | 48 | 512 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 975 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~96 GFLOPS | ~998.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1094 | 4133 |
| Single-core score | 435 | 1150 |
| Multi-core score | 1457 | 3103 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 140153 | 379212 |
| GPU | 26892 | 215650 |
| Memory | 68773 | 198436 |
| UX | 103186 | 255360 |
| Total score | 339004 | 1048658 |
| Samples | [14 tests] | [2 tests] |
Recent User Tests
Lenovo Tab M11
No benchmark results yet
Honor Pad 10
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-06-11 (Snowmen) | AnTuTu 11 | 1048658 |
| 📘 2026-05-24 (Aleks) | AnTuTu 11 | 1019587 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 1800 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | - |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 13 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | ZUI 15.1 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | 18 GB | - |
| OS updates | 7 years | 0 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7040 mAh | 10100 mAh |
| Max charge power | 20 W | 35 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Full charging time | 2:47 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | 1400 cycles |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | - |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 7 | - |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | - |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | January 2024 | May 2025 |
| Release date | April 2024 | May 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | $355 |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Accelerometer |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 35 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Honor Pad 10 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1
Related comparisons
7.
Honor Pad 10 vs Xiaomi Pad 7 (1)
