Oppo Pad 3 Pro vs Honor Pad 20
Here we compared two tablets: the 12.1-inch Oppo Pad 3 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) that was released on October 24, 2024, against the Honor Pad 20, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 1 year and 7 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Oppo Pad 3 Pro
- 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2333K versus 1042K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 45W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.0 versus UFS 3.1
- 89% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2179 and 1154 points
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad 20
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
- Weighs 61 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 2120 x 3000 pixels | 1872 x 3000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 7:5 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 304 ppi | 292 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 900 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 540 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 85.4% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 3 Pro
12.1″ (7:5 ratio) = 69.2 in2
Pad 20
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
~5% more screen space
Design and build
| Height | 268.66 mm (10.58 inches) | 277.1 mm (10.91 inches) |
| Width | 195.06 mm (7.68 inches) | 179.3 mm (7.06 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.49 mm (0.26 inches) | 6.3 mm (0.25 inches) |
| Weight | 586 g (20.67 oz) | 525 g (18.52 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gold, Blue | Gray, Green, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 524 cm2 (81.3 inches2) | 497 cm2 (77 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (46th and 63rd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (32nd and 46th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 2630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715) - 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 750 | Adreno 720 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 512 |
| GPU clock | 903-1000 MHz | 975 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS | ~998.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | - | 4098 |
| Single-core score | 2179 | 1154 |
| Multi-core score | 6500 | 3110 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 643259 | 369492 |
| GPU | 818824 | 210450 |
| Memory | 348314 | 181398 |
| UX | 522888 | 281337 |
| Total score | 2333285 | 1042677 |
| Samples | [298 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 95% | - |
| Graphics test | 12 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 1641 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 32 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 35 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 32 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 27 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 8285 | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 94% | - |
| Graphics test | 28 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 4700 | - |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 4200 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 | Android 16 |
| ROM | ColorOS 14.1 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS updates | - | 6 years |
| Security updates | - | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 9510 mAh | 10100 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (65% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 0:56 hr | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | - | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | - |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October 2024 | May 2026 |
| Release date | October 2024 | May 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | $499 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 67 W | Yes, 45 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Oppo Pad 3 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1
Related comparisons
2.
Honor Pad 20 vs Honor Pad 10 (1)