Xiaomi Redmi K Pad vs Honor Pad 20

82 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
VS
70 out of 100
Honor Pad 20

Here we compared two tablets: the 8.8-inch Xiaomi Redmi K Pad (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus) that was released on June 26, 2025, against the Honor Pad 20, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 11 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
  • 2.9x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3004K versus 1042K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
  • 38% higher pixel density (403 vs 292 PPI)
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 45W)
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
  • Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
  • Much smaller footprint: 45% more compact case (42 vs 77 square inches)
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad 20
  • Has a 3.3 inches larger screen size
  • Comes with 2600 mAh larger battery capacity: 10100 vs 7500 mAh
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi K Pad and Honor Pad 20 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
6 / 128 GB
80.3
(Good)
Value Index
53.3
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
vs

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 8.8 inches 12.1 inches
Resolution 1880 x 3008 pixels 1872 x 3000 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
PPI 403 ppi 292 ppi
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 700 nits 700 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 82.9% 85.4%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 99.8% -
PWM Not detected -
Response time 23 ms -
Contrast 1486:1 -
Screen space comparison
Pad 20
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Redmi K Pad
8.8″ (16:10 ratio) = 34.8 in2
~89% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
728 nits
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 205.1 mm (8.07 inches) 277.1 mm (10.91 inches)
Width 132 mm (5.2 inches) 179.3 mm (7.06 inches)
Thickness 6.5 mm (0.26 inches) 6.3 mm (0.25 inches)
Weight 326 g (11.5 oz) 525 g (18.52 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Green, Purple Gray, Green, Pink
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 271 cm2 (42 inches2) 497 cm2 (77 inches2)
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
82.9%
Pad 20 +3%
85.4%
Tablet Ranking (29th and 63rd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (22nd and 46th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi K Pad and Honor Pad 20
SoC
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
Max clock 3730 MHz 2630 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715)
- 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715)
L3 cache 12 MB 3 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek NPU 890 Yes
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 Adreno 720
GPU shading units 1536 512
GPU clock 1612 MHz 975 MHz
FLOPS ~4952.1 GFLOPS ~998.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi K Pad and Honor Pad 20
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Redmi K Pad +130%
2657
1154
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Redmi K Pad +167%
8298
3110
Compute Score (GPU)
Redmi K Pad +495%
24373
4098
Compute Score (GPU) 24373 4098
Single-core score 2657 1154
Multi-core score 8298 3110
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
Redmi K Pad +188%
3004759
1042677
CPU 923460 369492
GPU 1042496 210450
Memory 407660 181398
UX 631143 281337
Total score 3004759 1042677
Samples Less than 3 Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
n/a
Stability 77% -
Graphics test 16 FPS -
Graphics score 2157 -
3DMark Solar Bay
n/a
Graphics test 38 FPS -
Section 1 40 FPS -
Section 2 38 FPS -
Section 3 34 FPS -
Graphics score 9914 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
17844
n/a
Web score 17873 -
Video editing 6768 -
Photo editing 34918 -
Data manipulation 17855 -
Writing score 24733 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2025-12-09 -> Andre SuhenAnTuTu3004759
Honor Pad 20
No benchmark results yet

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 5333 MHz -
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 2.0 MagicOS 10
OS size 32 GB -
OS updates - 6 years
Security updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 7500 mAh 10100 mAh
Max charge power 67 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes No
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes Yes

Main camera

Matrix 13 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution - 3264 x 2448
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS No
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 13 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 13 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Sensor size 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution - 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.3 f/2.0
Sensor size 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
NFC* No No
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Number of SIM* - 1
Type of SIM card No Nano
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers Stereo 6.0
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes -
Speakers test
Max loudness
84.6 dB
n/a

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced June 2025 May 2026
Release date June 2025 May 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $469 $499
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
Bundled charger Yes, 67 W Yes, 45 W
Further details
Notes on Redmi K Pad:
    - The tablet features 2 USB Type-C 3.2 ports with Bypass charging and supports a magnetic stylus.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi K Pad is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!