Xiaomi Redmi K Pad vs Honor Pad 20
Here we compared two tablets: the 8.8-inch Xiaomi Redmi K Pad (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus) that was released on June 26, 2025, against the Honor Pad 20, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 and came out 11 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
- 2.9x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3004K versus 1042K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
- 38% higher pixel density (403 vs 292 PPI)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 45W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- Much smaller footprint: 45% more compact case (42 vs 77 square inches)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Honor Pad 20
- Has a 3.3 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 2600 mAh larger battery capacity: 10100 vs 7500 mAh
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 8.8 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 1880 x 3008 pixels | 1872 x 3000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 403 ppi | 292 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 700 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 85.4% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 23 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1486:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad 20
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Redmi K Pad
8.8″ (16:10 ratio) = 34.8 in2
~89% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 205.1 mm (8.07 inches) | 277.1 mm (10.91 inches) |
| Width | 132 mm (5.2 inches) | 179.3 mm (7.06 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm (0.26 inches) | 6.3 mm (0.25 inches) |
| Weight | 326 g (11.5 oz) | 525 g (18.52 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple | Gray, Green, Pink |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 271 cm2 (42 inches2) | 497 cm2 (77 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (29th and 63rd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (22nd and 46th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3730 MHz | 2630 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510) - 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715) - 1 core at 2.63 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 3 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 720 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 512 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 975 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~998.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24373 | 4098 |
| Single-core score | 2657 | 1154 |
| Multi-core score | 8298 | 3110 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 923460 | 369492 |
| GPU | 1042496 | 210450 |
| Memory | 407660 | 181398 |
| UX | 631143 | 281337 |
| Total score | 3004759 | 1042677 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 77% | - |
| Graphics test | 16 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2157 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 38 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 40 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 38 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 9914 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17873 | - |
| Video editing | 6768 | - |
| Photo editing | 34918 | - |
| Data manipulation | 17855 | - |
| Writing score | 24733 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-12-09 -> Andre Suhen | AnTuTu | 3004759 |
Honor Pad 20
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | MagicOS 10 |
| OS size | 32 GB | - |
| OS updates | - | 6 years |
| Security updates | - | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 7500 mAh | 10100 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 6.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | - |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | June 2025 | May 2026 |
| Release date | June 2025 | May 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | $499 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 67 W | Yes, 45 W |
Further details
Notes on Redmi K Pad:
- The tablet features 2 USB Type-C 3.2 ports with Bypass charging and supports a magnetic stylus.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi K Pad is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1
Related comparisons
2.
Honor Pad 20 vs Honor Pad 10 (1)