Galaxy Tab S10 Lite vs Galaxy Tab A11
55
out of 100
VS
53
out of 100
Here we compared two tablets: the 10.9-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite (with Exynos 1380) that was released on August 25, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11, which is powered by MediaTek Helio G99. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
- Has a 2.2 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 2900 mAh larger battery capacity: 8000 vs 5100 mAh
- 16% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (634K versus 545K)
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- Has 50% more RAM: 6GB versus 4GB
- 27% higher pixel density (228 vs 179 PPI)
- Supports higher wattage charging (25W versus 15W)
- 38% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1011 and 732 points
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Much smaller footprint: 38% more compact case (40.8 vs 65.4 square inches)
- Weighs 189 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 10.9 inches | 8.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1320 x 2112 pixels | 800 x 1340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 5:3 |
| PPI | 228 ppi | 179 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | - | No |
| Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.7% | 81.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - |
| RGB color space | 95.2% | 78.6% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 40 ms | 29 ms |
| Contrast | 1800:1 | 1461:1 |
Screen space comparison
Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
10.9″ (16:10 ratio) = 53.4 in2
Galaxy Tab A11
8.7″ (5:3 ratio) = 33.4 in2
~59% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 254.3 mm (10.01 inches) | 211 mm (8.31 inches) |
| Width | 165.8 mm (6.53 inches) | 124.7 mm (4.91 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm (0.26 inches) | 8 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 524 g (18.48 oz) | 335 g (11.82 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Red | Silver, Gray |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 422 cm2 (65.4 inches2) | 263 cm2 (40.8 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.86/5) | Average (2.72/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Good (C) · 104 drops |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (107th and 119th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (82nd and 92nd place)
Performance
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Max clock | 2400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 5 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 160 | 64 |
| GPU clock | 949 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~303.7 GFLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 3123 | 1314 |
| Single-core score | 1011 | 732 |
| Multi-core score | 2951 | 2049 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 244859 | 250145 |
| GPU | 91068 | 43322 |
| Memory | 122651 | 116331 |
| UX | 176286 | 135748 |
| Total score | 634864 | 545546 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [178 tests] |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | 87% | - |
| Graphics test | 5 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 876 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 8610 | 10433 |
| Video editing | 6004 | 4521 |
| Photo editing | 23113 | 14671 |
| Data manipulation | 8512 | 7520 |
| Writing score | 12376 | 11923 |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-05-07 (Lagymation) | AnTuTu 11 | 634864 |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (ctoyu7665) | AnTuTu 11 | 521495 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) |
| ROM | One UI 7.0 | One UI 8.0 |
| OS size | - | 14 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 8000 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Max charge power | 25 W | 15 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (51% in 60 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:00 hr | 2:28 hr |
| Battery cycles | 2000 cycles | 1200 cycles |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM support* | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 18 | 13 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | Yes |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | August 2025 | September 2025 |
| Release date | August 2025 | October 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $319 | $180 |
| SAR (body) | 0.92 W/kg | 0.29 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Galaxy Tab S10 Lite:
- GPS and compass are only available on the cellular model.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the display, performance, gaming, and connectivity are more important to you, then choose the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite. But if the battery life and software are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 16