Galaxy Tab A11 vs Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
53
out of 100
VS
71
out of 100
Here we compared two tablets: the 8.7-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab A11 (with MediaTek Helio G99) that was released on September 12, 2025, against the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8300 and came out 4 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
- Delivers 11% higher peak brightness (436 against 392 nits)
- Much smaller footprint: 52% more compact case (40.8 vs 85.6 square inches)
- Weighs 285 grams less
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- 2.9x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1564K versus 545K)
- Comes with 5100 mAh larger battery capacity: 10200 vs 5100 mAh
- Has a 4 inches larger screen size
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 15W)
- Fingerprint scanner
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
- 53% higher pixel density (273 vs 179 PPI)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 8.7 inches | 12.7 inches |
| Resolution | 800 x 1340 pixels | 2944 x 1840 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 5:3 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 179 ppi | 273 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10 |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.9% | 84.8% |
| Display features | - | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 78.6% | 93.7% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 29 ms | 28 ms |
| Contrast | 1461:1 | 918:1 |
Screen space comparison
Moto Pad 60 Pro
12.7″ (16:10 ratio) = 72.5 in2
Galaxy Tab A11
8.7″ (5:3 ratio) = 33.4 in2
~117% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 211 mm (8.31 inches) | 291.8 mm (11.49 inches) |
| Width | 124.7 mm (4.91 inches) | 189.1 mm (7.44 inches) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 335 g (11.82 oz) | 620 g (21.87 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP52 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Gray | Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 263 cm2 (40.8 inches2) | 552 cm2 (85.5 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.72/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Good (C) · 104 drops | - |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (110th and 59th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (85th and 43rd place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 |
| Max clock | 2200 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A76 |
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~128 GFLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 1314 | - |
| Single-core score | 732 | 1407 |
| Multi-core score | 2049 | 4370 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 250145 | 458662 |
| GPU | 43322 | 368791 |
| Memory | 116331 | 303801 |
| UX | 135748 | 433346 |
| Total score | 545546 | 1564600 |
| Samples | [178 tests] | Less than 3 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 10433 | - |
| Video editing | 4521 | - |
| Photo editing | 14671 | - |
| Data manipulation | 7520 | - |
| Writing score | 11923 | - |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-09 (ctoyu7665) | AnTuTu | 521495 |
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-05-21 -> abangzamani92 | AnTuTu | 1564600 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 |
| ROM | One UI 8.0 | - |
| OS size | 14 GB | 28 GB |
| OS updates | 5 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 5100 mAh | 10200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 15 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | Yes |
| Fast charging | Yes (51% in 60 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 2:28 hr | - |
| Battery cycles | 1200 cycles | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | No | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | - |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | - |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | No | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | - |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | No |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| LTE Cat* | 13 | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | April 2025 |
| Release date | October 2025 | April 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $180 | $315 |
| SAR (body) | 0.29 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 68 W |
Further details
Notes on Moto Pad 60 Pro:
- The 128 GB version comes with slower UFS 3.1 storage.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1