Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra vs Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Here we compared two tablets: the 14.6-inch Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra (with MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus) that was released on September 26, 2024, against the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8300 and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
- Waterproof body (IP68 classification)
- Has a 1.9 inches larger screen size
- 46% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2347K versus 1604K)
- Delivers 56% higher peak brightness (599 against 385 nits)
- Comes with 1000 mAh larger battery capacity: 11200 vs 10200 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Thinner bezels – 6% more screen real estate
- Dynamic AMOLED display (versus competitor's LTPS LCD)
- The front-facing camera can record video at 4K
- Ready for eSIM technology
Reasons to consider the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Much smaller footprint: 19% more compact case (85.6 vs 105.5 square inches)
- 14% higher pixel density (273 vs 239 PPI)
- Weighs 98 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS LCD |
| Size | 14.6 inches | 12.7 inches |
| Resolution | 1848 x 2960 pixels | 1840 x 2944 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 239 ppi | 273 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 930 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | No |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 84.8% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.9% | 98.4% |
| PWM | 120 Hz | Not detected |
| Response time | 3 ms | 29 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinity | ∞ Infinity |
Screen space comparison
Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
14.6″ (16:10 ratio) = 95.8 in2
Idea Tab Pro
12.7″ (16:10 ratio) = 72.5 in2
~32% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 326.4 mm (12.85 inches) | 291.8 mm (11.49 inches) |
| Width | 208.6 mm (8.21 inches) | 189.1 mm (7.44 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.4 mm (0.21 inches) | 6.9 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 718 g (25.33 oz) | 620 g (21.87 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP68 | No |
| Advanced cooling | Vapor chamber | - |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Silver, Gray | Gray, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-display | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 681 cm2 (105.5 inches2) | 552 cm2 (85.5 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.85/5) | Excellent (4.04/5) |
| Drop resistance | - | Bad (E) · 14 drops |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (34th and 66th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (26th and 49th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus | MediaTek Dimensity 8300 |
| Max clock | 3250 MHz | 3350 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 2.85 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510 - 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715 - 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 790 | MediaTek APU 780 |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G615 MP5 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 1300 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS | ~2150.4 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 14163 | 7982 |
| Single-core score | 2135 | 1405 |
| Multi-core score | 7125 | 4438 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 676003 | 531924 |
| GPU | 788281 | 401550 |
| Memory | 368524 | 290446 |
| UX | 514308 | 380890 |
| Total score | 2347116 | 1604810 |
| Samples | [64 tests] | [64 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 78% | 77% |
| Graphics test | 14 FPS | 7 FPS |
| Graphics score | 1898 | 881 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 31 FPS | 14 FPS |
| Section 1 | 33 FPS | 16 FPS |
| Section 2 | 31 FPS | 14 FPS |
| Section 3 | 27 FPS | 12 FPS |
| Graphics score | 8051 | 3688 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | 31 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 5298 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 14898 | - |
| Video editing | 6833 | - |
| Photo editing | 28407 | - |
| Data manipulation | 17927 | - |
| Writing score | 22497 | - |
Recent User Tests
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra
No benchmark results yet
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-06 (JOSUK3) | AnTuTu 11 | 1598851 |
| 📘 2026-01-19 (JRioux) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 7982 |
| 📘 2026-01-19 (JRioux) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1405 / 4438 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 14 |
| ROM | One UI 8.5 | - |
| OS size | 28.1 GB | 46 GB |
| OS updates | 0 years | 7 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 11200 mAh | 10200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (80% in 61 min) | Yes (50% in 50 min) |
| Full charging time | 1:43 hr | 2:20 hr |
| Battery cycles | 2000 cycles | 1000 cycles |
| Web browsing | 12:18 hr | 13:21 hr |
| Watching video | 18:28 hr | 18:05 hr |
| Gaming | 09:39 hr | 08:22 hr |
| Standby | 167 hr | 157 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4128 x 3096 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP 2) Ultrawide: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Stabilization | Digital | - |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 12 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4000 x 3000 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Focal length | 26 mm | - |
| Sensor | - | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Additional lens | 12 MP | - |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, Galileo |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 1 | - |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | No |
| eSIM support* | Yes | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | No |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2024 | March 2025 |
| Release date | October 2024 | March 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1199 | $379 |
| Successor | - Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra | - |
| SAR (head) | 0.94 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 45 W |
Further details
Notes on Idea Tab Pro:
- The 128 GB model uses UFS 3.1, while the 256 GB version has UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 11