Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra vs Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2
87
out of 100
VS
67
out of 100
Here we compared two tablets: the 14-inch Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra (with Xiaomi Xring O1) that was released on May 22, 2025, against the Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7400 and came out 1 year and 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
- 3x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2963K versus 979K)
- Has a 1.9 inches larger screen size
- Has 2x more RAM: 12GB versus 6GB
- Comes with 1800 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 10200 mAh
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 45W)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Fingerprint scanner
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- Thinner bezels – 7.9% more screen real estate
- OLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
Reasons to consider the Lenovo Tab Plus Gen 2
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 2048GB
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- Much smaller footprint: 20% more compact case (78.3 vs 98.3 square inches)
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 14 inches | 12.1 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 275 ppi | 249 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | - |
| Max rated brightness | - | 800 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1600 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92% | 84.1% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 7 Ultra
14″ (3:2 ratio) = 90.5 in2
Tab Plus Gen 2
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
~37% more screen space
Design and build
| Height | 305.82 mm (12.04 inches) | 278.8 mm (10.98 inches) |
| Width | 207.47 mm (8.17 inches) | 181.1 mm (7.13 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.1 mm (0.2 inches) | 6.8 mm (0.27 inches) |
| Weight | 609 g (21.48 oz) | 775 g (27.34 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP52 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | White |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | No |
| Area | 634 cm2 (98.4 inches2) | 505 cm2 (78.3 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (19th and 69th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (15th and 51st place)
Performance
| Chipset | Xiaomi Xring O1 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 |
| Max clock | 3700 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 2048 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1392 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5701.6 GFLOPS | ~665.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 20977 | 2988 |
| Single-core score | 2737 | 1060 |
| Multi-core score | 9191 | 3148 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 937172 | 358193 |
| GPU | 996086 | 158502 |
| Memory | 409648 | 181398 |
| UX | 620146 | 281337 |
| Total score | 2963052 | 979430 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 93% | - |
| Graphics test | 19 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2510 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 37 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 39 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 38 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 9767 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 19150 | - |
| Video editing | 7129 | - |
| Photo editing | 29727 | - |
| Data manipulation | 18881 | - |
| Writing score | 21285 | - |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 12 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | - |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 2048 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | - |
| OS updates | - | 2 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 12000 mAh | 10200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 40 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:26 hr |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | - |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | - |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | - | Yes |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | May 2025 | June 2026 |
| Release date | May 2025 | June 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | - | $369 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Pad 7 Ultra:
- The Nano Soft screen model is 10g heavier.
- NFC is supported for data transfer only.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1