Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra vs OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 14-inch Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra (with Xiaomi Xring O1) that was released on May 22, 2025, against the OnePlus Pad 3 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 1 year and 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 67W)
- Fingerprint scanner
- OLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
- Weighs 63 grams less
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
- Comes with 1380 mAh larger battery capacity: 13380 vs 12000 mAh
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
- 34% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3960K versus 2963K)
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
- 15% higher pixel density (315 vs 275 PPI)
- 31% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3574 and 2737 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 14 inches | 13.2 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 2400 x 3392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 275 ppi | 315 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | - | 700 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 1600 nits | 1000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | 540 Hz |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92% | 87.5% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
Screen space comparison
Pad 7 Ultra
14″ (3:2 ratio) = 90.5 in2
Pad 3 Pro
13.2″ (7:5 ratio) = 82.4 in2
~9% more screen space
Design and build
| Height | 305.82 mm (12.04 inches) | 289.7 mm (11.41 inches) |
| Width | 207.47 mm (8.17 inches) | 209.8 mm (8.26 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.1 mm (0.2 inches) | 5.9 mm (0.23 inches) |
| Weight | 609 g (21.48 oz) | 672 g (23.7 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Gray, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | No |
| Area | 634 cm2 (98.4 inches2) | 608 cm2 (94.2 inches2) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (19th and 2nd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (15th and 1st place)
Performance
| Chipset | Xiaomi Xring O1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max clock | 3700 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance - 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime |
| L3 cache | - | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Immortalis-G925 MP16 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 2048 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1392 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5701.6 GFLOPS | ~3993.6 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 20977 | 27874 |
| Single-core score | 2737 | 3574 |
| Multi-core score | 9191 | 11181 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 937172 | 1097882 |
| GPU | 996086 | 1439025 |
| Memory | 409648 | 509895 |
| UX | 620146 | 914038 |
| Total score | 2963052 | 3960840 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 93% | - |
| Graphics test | 19 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 2510 | - |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 37 FPS | - |
| Section 1 | 39 FPS | - |
| Section 2 | 38 FPS | - |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 9767 | - |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 19150 | - |
| Video editing | 7129 | - |
| Photo editing | 29727 | - |
| Data manipulation | 18881 | - |
| Writing score | 21285 | - |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | OxygenOS 16 |
Battery
| Capacity | 12000 mAh | 13380 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 67 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | May 2025 | June 2026 |
| Release date | May 2025 | June 2026 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Yes, 67 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 7 Ultra:
- The Nano Soft screen model is 10g heavier.
- NFC is supported for data transfer only.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These tablets have a lot in common, but we would recommend the OnePlus Pad 3 Pro. It has a better performance, gaming, battery life, connectivity, and software.
Cast your vote
Total votes: < 1