Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra vs OnePlus Pad 3 Pro

87 out of 100
Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
VS
93 out of 100
OnePlus Pad 3 Pro

Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 14-inch Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra (with Xiaomi Xring O1) that was released on May 22, 2025, against the OnePlus Pad 3 Pro, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and came out 1 year and 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 67W)
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • OLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
  • Weighs 63 grams less
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
  • Comes with 1380 mAh larger battery capacity: 13380 vs 12000 mAh
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v6.0)
  • 34% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3960K versus 2963K)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • 15% higher pixel density (315 vs 275 PPI)
  • 31% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3574 and 2737 points

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra and OnePlus Pad 3 Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
12 / 256 GB
VS
12 / 256 GB

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
vs

Display

Type OLED IPS LCD
Size 14 inches 13.2 inches
Resolution 2136 x 3200 pixels 2400 x 3392 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 7:5
PPI 275 ppi 315 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness - 700 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 1600 nits 1000 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz 540 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 92% 87.5%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Screen space comparison
Pad 7 Ultra
14″ (3:2 ratio) = 90.5 in2
Pad 3 Pro
13.2″ (7:5 ratio) = 82.4 in2
~9% more screen space

Design and build

Height 305.82 mm (12.04 inches) 289.7 mm (11.41 inches)
Width 207.47 mm (8.17 inches) 209.8 mm (8.26 inches)
Thickness 5.1 mm (0.2 inches) 5.9 mm (0.23 inches)
Weight 609 g (21.48 oz) 672 g (23.7 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Blue Gray, Green
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button No
Area 634 cm2 (98.4 inches2) 608 cm2 (94.2 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio
92%
87.5%
Tablet Ranking (19th and 2nd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (15th and 1st place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra and OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
SoC
Chipset Xiaomi Xring O1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max clock 3700 MHz 4320 MHz
CPU cores 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925
- 6 cores at 3.63 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Performance
- 2 cores at 4.74 GHz: Oryon Gen 3 Prime
L3 cache - 12 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 3 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Hexagon
GPU
Graphics Immortalis-G925 MP16 Adreno 830
GPU shading units 2048 1536
GPU clock 1392 MHz 1300 MHz
FLOPS ~5701.6 GFLOPS ~3993.6 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Pad 7 Ultra and OnePlus Pad 3 Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Pad 3 Pro +31%
3574
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Pad 3 Pro +22%
11181
Compute Score (GPU)
20977
Pad 3 Pro +33%
27874
Compute Score (GPU) 20977 27874
Single-core score 2737 3574
Multi-core score 9191 11181
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2963052
Pad 3 Pro +34%
3960840
CPU 937172 1097882
GPU 996086 1439025
Memory 409648 509895
UX 620146 914038
Total score 2963052 3960840
Samples [2 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 93% -
Graphics test 19 FPS -
Graphics score 2510 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 37 FPS -
Section 1 39 FPS -
Section 2 38 FPS -
Section 3 34 FPS -
Graphics score 9767 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 19150 -
Video editing 7129 -
Photo editing 29727 -
Data manipulation 18881 -
Writing score 21285 -

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz 5300 MHz
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 256 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 4.1
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 2.0 OxygenOS 16

Battery

Capacity 12000 mAh 13380 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 67 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes Yes

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution - 4128 x 3096
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode - Bokeh mode
- Pro mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/2.2
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (≈ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution - 3264 x 2448
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Sensor Omnivision OV32D CMOS
Sensor size 1/3.6" (≈ 0.28 inch) -
Pixel size 0.61 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes
NFC* No No
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Type of SIM card No No
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot - No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers 8.0 8.0
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No

Other

Category Flagship Flagship
Announced May 2025 June 2026
Release date May 2025 June 2026
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 120 W Yes, 67 W
Further details
Notes on Pad 7 Ultra:
    - The Nano Soft screen model is 10g heavier.
    - NFC is supported for data transfer only.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

These tablets have a lot in common, but we would recommend the OnePlus Pad 3 Pro. It has a better performance, gaming, battery life, connectivity, and software.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!