Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 vs Asus Pad (T3201)

85 out of 100
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
VS
74 out of 100
Asus Pad (T3201)

Here we compared two tablets: the 12.5-inch Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 (with Xiaomi Xring O1) that was released on June 26, 2025, against the Asus Pad (T3201), which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8300 and came out 1 year and 1 month after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
  • 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2963K versus 1331K)
  • Comes with 1610 mAh larger battery capacity: 10610 vs 9000 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 45W)
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
Reasons to consider the Asus Pad (T3201)
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • OLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
  • Weighs 56 grams less

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 and Asus Pad (T3201) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
88.6
(Very good)
Value Index
63.2
(Average)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD OLED
Size 12.5 inches 12.2 inches
Resolution 2136 x 3200 pixels 2800 x 1840 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 3:2
PPI 308 ppi 275 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max rated brightness 1000 nits -
Max rated brightness in HDR - 2000 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 5 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 86.8% 89.8%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
- DC Dimming
Display tests
RGB color space 97.9% -
PWM Not detected -
Response time 30 ms -
Contrast 3415:1 -
Screen space comparison
Pad 7S Pro 12.5
12.5β€³ (3:2 ratio) = 72.1 in2
Pad (T3201)
12.2β€³ (3:2 ratio) = 68.7 in2
~4% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 279.1 mm (10.99 inches) 271.1 mm (10.67 inches)
Width 192 mm (7.56 inches) 182 mm (7.17 inches)
Thickness 5.8 mm (0.23 inches) 6.5 mm (0.26 inches)
Weight 576 g (20.32 oz) 520 g (18.34 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Black, Silver, Gray, Purple White
Fingerprint scanner Yes, in-button No
Area 536 cm2 (83.1 inches2) 493 cm2 (76.5 inches2)
Screen-to-body ratio
89.8%
Tablet Ranking (26th and 57th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (21st and 42nd place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 and Asus Pad (T3201)
SoC
Chipset Xiaomi Xring O1 MediaTek Dimensity 8300
Max clock 3400 MHz 3350 MHz
CPU cores 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725
- 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715
L3 cache - 4 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 3 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 780
GPU
Graphics Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 Mali G615 MP6
GPU shading units 2048 768
GPU clock 1392 MHz 1400 MHz
FLOPS ~5701.6 GFLOPS ~2150.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 and Asus Pad (T3201)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
2746
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
8431
Compute Score (GPU)
21512
Compute Score (GPU) 21512 9511
Single-core score 2746 1396
Multi-core score 8431 4296
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
2963052
1331667
CPU 937172 367218
GPU 996086 492839
Memory 409648 234854
UX 620146 236756
Total score 2963052 1331667
Samples [2 tests] Less than 3
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Stability 92% -
Graphics test 18 FPS -
Graphics score 2413 -
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test 34 FPS -
Section 1 37 FPS -
Section 2 35 FPS -
Section 3 31 FPS -
Graphics score 9022 -
Sources: 3DMark [5]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 17566 -
Video editing 6957 -
Photo editing 27481 -
Data manipulation 15048 -
Writing score 19142 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-28 (Satoru_Goatjo)AnTuTu 112842416
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-09 (Albert)CPU Throttle92%
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 GPU21512
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)Geekbench 6 CPU2746 / 8431
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-05 (Albert?)AnTuTu 112963052
Asus Pad (T3201)
No benchmark results yet

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 4800 MHz -
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.1 UFS 3.1
Memory card No MicroSD
Memory card max size - Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 2.0 -
OS size 31 GB -
Security updates - 3 years

Battery

Capacity 10610 mAh 9000 mAh
Max charge power 120 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes Yes (50% in 30 min)
Battery life tests
Web browsing 14:06 hr -
Watching video 21:34 hr -
Gaming 09:10 hr -
Standby 169 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 50 megapixels 13 megapixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 60FPS No
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion - No
Lenses 1) Standard: 50 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode -
Standard lens
Image resolution 50 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/1.8 -
Sensor Samsung S5KJN1 -
Sensor size 1/2.76" (β‰ˆ 0.36 inch) -
Pixel size 0.64 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 32 megapixels 5 megapixels
Aperture f/2.2 -
Sensor Omnivision OV32D -
Sensor size 1/3.6" (β‰ˆ 0.28 inch) -
Pixel size 0.61 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 3.0
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes Yes, DP 1.4
NFC* No No
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Type of SIM card No No
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot - No
5G support No No

Sound

Speakers 6.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos - Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Flagship Mid-range
Announced June 2025 July 2026
Release date June 2025 August 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $460 $480
Sensors - Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
Bundled charger Yes, 120 W Yes, 45 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total votes: < 1

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!