Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 vs OnePlus Pad 3
86
out of 100
VS
80
out of 100
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 12.5-inch Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5 (with Xiaomi Xring O1) that was released on June 26, 2025, against the OnePlus Pad 3, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite and came out 1 month before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
- Shows 100% longer battery life (35:23 vs 17:40 hours)
- Supports higher wattage charging (120W versus 80W)
- Fingerprint scanner
- Much smaller footprint: 12% more compact case (83.1 vs 94.1 square inches)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- Reverse charging feature
- CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
- Weighs 99 grams less
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the OnePlus Pad 3
- Comes with 1530 mAh larger battery capacity: 12140 vs 10610 mAh
- Has 50% more RAM: 12GB versus 8GB
- 12% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3317K versus 2963K)
- 9% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 3003 and 2746 points
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.5 inches | 13.2 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 2400 x 3392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 308 ppi | 315 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 1000 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | 60-144 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 87.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 97.9% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 30 ms | - |
| Contrast | 3415:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad 3
13.2β³ (7:5 ratio) = 82.4 in2
Pad 7S Pro 12.5
12.5β³ (3:2 ratio) = 72.1 in2
~14% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 279.1 mm (10.99 inches) | 289.61 mm (11.4 inches) |
| Width | 192 mm (7.56 inches) | 209.66 mm (8.25 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.8 mm (0.23 inches) | 5.97 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 576 g (20.32 oz) | 675 g (23.81 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Silver, Gray, Purple | Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes, in-button | No |
| Area | 536 cm2 (83.1 inches2) | 607 cm2 (94.1 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (17th and 34th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (13th and 25th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Xiaomi Xring O1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max clock | 3400 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU cores | 10 (2 + 4 + 2 + 2) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 4 cores at 3.4 GHz: Cortex-A725 - 2 cores at 3.9 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 6 cores at 3.53 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix M) - 2 cores at 4.32 GHz: Oryon (Phoenix L) |
| L3 cache | - | 8 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 3 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU shading units | 2048 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1392 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~5701.6 GFLOPS | ~3379.2 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 21512 | 24691 |
| Single-core score | 2746 | 3003 |
| Multi-core score | 8431 | 9307 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 937172 | 1061523 |
| GPU | 996086 | 1152696 |
| Memory | 409648 | 369778 |
| UX | 620146 | 733417 |
| Total score | 2963052 | 3317414 |
| Samples | [2 tests] | [4 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 92% | 82% |
| Graphics test | 18 FPS | 19 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2413 | 2544 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 34 FPS | 45 FPS |
| Section 1 | 37 FPS | 50 FPS |
| Section 2 | 35 FPS | 46 FPS |
| Section 3 | 31 FPS | 40 FPS |
| Graphics score | 9022 | 11865 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17566 | 13279 |
| Video editing | 6957 | 6340 |
| Photo editing | 27481 | 25239 |
| Data manipulation | 15048 | 15200 |
| Writing score | 19142 | 18634 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-06-28 (Satoru_Goatjo) | AnTuTu 11 | 2842416 |
| π 2026-04-09 (Albert) | CPU Throttle | 92% |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 21512 |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 2746 / 8431 |
| π 2026-02-05 (Albert?) | AnTuTu 11 | 2963052 |
OnePlus Pad 3
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-09-09 (Harsh) | AnTuTu 11 | 3242325 |
| π 2026-07-10 (ΠΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈΠ» Oneplus Fan) | AnTuTu 11 | 3286274 |
| π 2026-06-20 (SusGo0d) | AnTuTu 11 | 3188009 |
| π 2026-04-03 -> Afera666 | AnTuTu 11 | 3612786 |
| π 2026-03-30 (Shakeel) | AnTuTu 11 | 3317414 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 4800 MHz | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | Oxygen OS 15 |
| OS size | 31 GB | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 10610 mAh | 12140 mAh |
| Max charge power | 120 W | 80 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes (40% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:29 hr |
| Web browsing | 14:06 hr | 06:01 hr |
| Watching video | 21:34 hr | 12:27 hr |
| Gaming | 09:10 hr | 07:31 hr |
| Standby | 169 hr | 77 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4128 x 3096 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 50 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
| Image resolution | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76" (β 0.36 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.64 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 32 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 3264 x 2448 |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV32D | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.6" (β 0.28 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 0.61 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | June 2025 | June 2025 |
| Release date | June 2025 | June 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $460 | $649 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 120 W | Yes, 80 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the camera and battery life are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Pad 7S Pro 12.5. But if the performance and gaming are more of a priority β go for the OnePlus Pad 3.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 26