Xiaomi Pad 8 vs Realme Pad 3
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11.2-inch Xiaomi Pad 8 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4) that was released on September 25, 2025, against the Realme Pad 3, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Max and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 8
- 2.6x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (2296K versus 872K)
- Higher display refresh rate β 144 Hz
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Compatible with the latest Wi-Fi 7 wireless networks
- 16% higher pixel density (344 vs 297 PPI)
- 2.1x faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2119 and 1030 points
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
- Weighs 93 grams less
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Realme Pad 3
- Comes with 3000 mAh larger battery capacity: 12200 vs 9200 mAh
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- Fingerprint scanner
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 11.2 inches | 11.6 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 2000 x 2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 7:5 |
| PPI | 344 ppi | 297 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | - |
| Max rated brightness | 800 nits | 550 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 85.9% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - |
Screen space comparison
Pad 3
11.6β³ (7:5 ratio) = 63.6 in2
Pad 8
11.2β³ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
~9% more screen space
Design and build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) | 255.6 mm (10.06 inches) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) | 187.03 mm (7.36 inches) |
| Thickness | 5.75 mm (0.23 inches) | 6.6 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 485 g (17.11 oz) | 578 g (20.39 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Gold, Gray |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) | 478 cm2 (74 inches2) |
| Repairability | Average (2.74/5) | - |
| Drop resistance | Very good (B) Β· 208 drops | - |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (24th and 82nd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (18th and 61st place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Max |
| Max clock | 3210 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 2 cores at 2.02 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 2 cores at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.21 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 825 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU shading units | 1024 | 256 |
| GPU clock | 1150 MHz | 1047 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~2355.2 GFLOPS | ~536.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
| Single-core score | 2119 | 1030 |
| Multi-core score | 6769 | 2999 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 626036 | 344761 |
| GPU | 810590 | 127658 |
| Memory | 365628 | 141518 |
| UX | 493823 | 258256 |
| Total score | 2296077 | 872193 |
| Samples | [6 tests] | [202 tests] |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Pad 8
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| π 2026-08-12 -> Sakivuu | AnTuTu | 2333032 |
| π 2026-08-09 -> Sakivuu | AnTuTu | 2296077 |
| π 2026-07-15 -> AzuNoBel | AnTuTu | 2284615 |
| π 2026-06-26 (yi) | GeekBench GPU | 13259 |
| π 2026-06-26 (yi) | GeekBench CPU | 2024 / 6171 |
Realme Pad 3
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | - |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | Realme UI 7.0 |
| OS updates | 0 years | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 9200 mAh | 12200 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Silicon-Carbon (Si/C) |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | Yes |
| Bypass charging | - | No |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Battery cycles | 1000 cycles | - |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" (β 0.33 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (β 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | - | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | September 2025 | January 2026 |
| Release date | September 2025 | January 2026 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $310 | $300 |
| SAR (body) | 0.99 W/kg | - |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
Further details
Notes on Pad 8:
- The 128GB model uses UFS 3.1, while the 256GB model uses UFS 4.1.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 8 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 9