Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro vs Realme Pad 3

66 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
VS
65 out of 100
Realme Pad 3

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4) that was released on September 24, 2025, against the Realme Pad 3, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Max and came out 3 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
  • 13% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (986K versus 872K)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
  • 20% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1239 and 1030 points
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Realme Pad 3
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • 19% higher pixel density (297 vs 249 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 33W)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro and Realme Pad 3 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
📱 Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
6 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
73.4
(Good)
Value Index
85.9
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
vs

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.1 inches 11.6 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 2000 x 2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 7:5
PPI 249 ppi 297 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) -
Max rated brightness - 550 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 650 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision No
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 83.5% 85.9%
Display tests
RGB color space 96.6% -
PWM Not detected -
Response time 28 ms -
Contrast 1764:1 -
Screen space comparison
Redmi Pad 2 Pro
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Pad 3
11.6″ (7:5 ratio) = 63.6 in2
~3% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
542 nits
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 279.8 mm (11.02 inches) 255.6 mm (10.06 inches)
Width 181.7 mm (7.15 inches) 187.03 mm (7.36 inches)
Thickness 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) 6.6 mm (0.26 inches)
Weight 610 g (21.52 oz) 578 g (20.39 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Silver, Gray, Purple Gold, Gray
Fingerprint scanner No Yes, in-button
Area 508 cm2 (78.8 inches2) 478 cm2 (74 inches2)
Repairability Average (2.74/5) -
Drop resistance Very good (B) · 208 drops -
Screen-to-body ratio
Pad 3 +3%
85.9%
Tablet Ranking (78th and 82nd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (59th and 61st place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro and Realme Pad 3
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Max
Max clock 2700 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
- 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache - 4 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 655
GPU
Graphics Adreno 810 Mali-G615 MP2
GPU shading units 256 256
GPU clock 895 MHz 1047 MHz
FLOPS ~458.2 GFLOPS ~536.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro and Realme Pad 3
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1239
1030
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
3286
2999
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 4784 -
Single-core score 1239 1030
Multi-core score 3286 2999
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
986882
872193
CPU 380886 344761
GPU 190421 127658
Memory 139368 141518
UX 276207 258256
Total score 986882 872193
Samples Less than 3 [202 tests]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
📘 2026-04-03 (Deepa)GeekBench GPU4784
📘 2026-04-03 (Deepa)GeekBench CPU1239 / 3286
📘 2026-04-03 (Deepa)AnTuTu986882
Realme Pad 3
No benchmark results yet

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 6 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 -
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 2048 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 2.0 Realme UI 7.0
OS size 34 GB -
OS updates 0 years -

Battery

Capacity 12000 mAh 12200 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Silicon-Carbon (Si/C)
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes Yes
Bypass charging - No
Fast charging Yes (30% in 30 min) Yes
Full charging time 2:20 hr -
Battery cycles 1000 cycles -
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:13 hr -
Watching video 11:17 hr -
Gaming 07:52 hr -
Standby 233 hr -
General battery life
32:02 hr
n/a

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No -
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Sensor size 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.0
Focal length 17 mm -
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/5.0" (≈ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* - 1
Type of SIM card No Nano
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No No
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes No
Speakers test
Max loudness
92.3 dB
n/a

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced September 2025 January 2026
Release date September 2025 January 2026
Launch price (MSRP) $299 $300
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Hall-effect sensor
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 33 W Yes, 45 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the camera, performance, gaming, connectivity, and sound are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro. But if the display and battery life are more of a priority – go for the Realme Pad 3.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
6 (31.6%)
13 (68.4%)
Total votes: 19

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!