Xiaomi Poco Pad vs Xiaomi Pad 7

63 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad
VS
70 out of 100
Xiaomi Pad 7

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Poco Pad (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) that was released on May 23, 2024, against the Xiaomi Pad 7, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 and came out 6 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad
  • Has a 0.9 inch larger screen size
  • Comes with 1150 mAh larger battery capacity: 10000 vs 8850 mAh
  • Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
  • Reverse charging feature
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 7
  • 2.2x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1697K versus 778K)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • 38% higher pixel density (344 vs 249 PPI)
  • More recent OS version: Android 15 versus 14
  • Much smaller footprint: 14% more compact case (67.6 vs 78.9 square inches)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 33W)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco Pad and Pad 7 crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
86
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
51
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
66
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
46
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
91*
79
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
70
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
63*
70
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
71.1
(Good)
Value Index
75.6
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
vs

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 12.1 inches 11.2 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 2136 x 3200 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 3:2
PPI 249 ppi 344 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No -
Max rated brightness 600 nits 800 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch sampling rate - 360 Hz
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 83.4% 85.7%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space - 97.3%
PWM - Not detected
Response time - 23 ms
Contrast - 952:1
Screen space comparison
Poco Pad
12.1β€³ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Pad 7
11.2β€³ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
~13% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
n/a
808 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 280 mm (11.02 inches) 251.22 mm (9.89 inches)
Width 181.85 mm (7.16 inches) 173.42 mm (6.83 inches)
Thickness 7.52 mm (0.3 inches) 6.18 mm (0.24 inches)
Weight 571 g (20.14 oz) 500 g (17.64 oz)
Waterproof - No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Blue Black, Blue, Green
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 509 cm2 (78.9 inches2) 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2)
Repairability - Average (2.74/5)
Drop resistance - Very good (B) Β· 208 drops
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
83.4%
Pad 7 +3%
85.7%
Tablet Ranking (97th and 71st place)
Android Tablet Ranking (74th and 54th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco Pad and Xiaomi Pad 7
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
Max clock 2400 MHz 2800 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (1 + 4 + 3)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 3 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X4
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 710 Adreno 732
GPU shading units 256 768
GPU clock 940 MHz 950 MHz
FLOPS ~481.3 GFLOPS ~1459.2 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco Pad and Xiaomi Pad 7
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1032
Pad 7 +79%
1843
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
2976
Pad 7 +67%
4978
Compute Score (GPU)
2314
Pad 7 +286%
8926
Compute Score (GPU) 2314 8926
Single-core score 1032 1843
Multi-core score 2976 4978
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
778166
Pad 7 +118%
1697444
CPU 297225 552288
GPU 73188 419835
Memory 152467 290516
UX 255286 434805
Total score 778166 1697444
Samples [2 tests] [18 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
n/a
967
Stability - 98%
Graphics test - 7 FPS
Graphics score - 967
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
12964
n/a
Web score 13631 -
Video editing 6946 -
Photo editing 24734 -
Data manipulation 11507 -
Writing score 13590 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco Pad
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-29 (SRG)Geekbench 6 CPU1025 / 2768
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-28 (SRG)AnTuTu 11770063
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-15 (Jeff)AnTuTu 11778166
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-20 (Vxmpiri)Geekbench 6 GPU2314
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-20 (Vxmpiri)Geekbench 6 CPU1032 / 2976
Xiaomi Pad 7
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (SmokerPH)Geekbench 6 GPU9571
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-29 (SmokerPH)Geekbench 6 CPU1884 / 5226
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-05 (Aditay)AnTuTu 111672445
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (Samarth Kawade)Geekbench 6 CPU1918 / 5161
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-04 (Samarth Kawade)AnTuTu 111776424

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 4200 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
Memory card MicroSD No
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB -

Software

Operating system Android 14 Android 15
ROM HyperOS 1.0 HyperOS 2.0
OS size - 32 GB
OS updates - 5 years

Battery

Capacity 10000 mAh 8850 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (29% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 30 min)
Full charging time 2:00 hr 1:20 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 10:46 hr
Watching video - 15:40 hr
Gaming - 07:07 hr
Standby - 128 hr
General battery life
n/a
26:39 hr

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution - 4160 x 3120
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion No -
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/2.2
Sensor - Omnivision OV13B10
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/3.06" (β‰ˆ 0.33 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Aperture - f/2.3
Sensor CMOS Omnivision OV08D10
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size 1.12 micron 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
NFC* No No
Infrared port No Yes
Network
Number of SIM* 1 -
Type of SIM card Nano No
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot No -
5G support Yes No

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
n/a
90.4 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced May 2024 October 2024
Release date May 2024 October 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $329 $299
Successor - - Xiaomi Pad 8
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 33 W Yes, 45 W
Further details
Notes on Poco Pad:
    - The 5G model has water resistance, a 128 GB memory option, and GPS. The Wi-Fi model has none of these features.
Notes on Pad 7:
    - The 128 GB variant features UFS 3.1 memory, other models have UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Pad 7 is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
17 (28.3%)
43 (71.7%)
Total votes: 60

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!