Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE vs Xiaomi Poco Pad

48 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
VS
64 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad

Here we compared two tablets: the 11-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 680) that was released on August 15, 2023, against the Xiaomi Poco Pad, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and came out 10 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory
8 / 256 GB

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
  • Much smaller footprint: 16% more compact case (66.2 vs 78.9 square inches)
  • Weighs 93 grams less
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad
  • 89% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (778K versus 411K)
  • Has a 1.1 inches larger screen size
  • Comes with 2000 mAh larger battery capacity: 10000 vs 8000 mAh
  • Has 2x more RAM: 8GB versus 4GB
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.2)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • More recent OS version: Android 14 versus 13
  • 20% higher pixel density (249 vs 207 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (33W versus 18W)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE and Poco Pad crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
4 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 256 GB
67.7
(Good)
Value Index
73.8
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests
Tablet:
vs

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11 inches 12.1 inches
Resolution 1200 x 1920 pixels 1600 x 2560 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
PPI 207 ppi 249 ppi
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No No
Max rated brightness 400 nits 600 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, Dolby Vision
Screen protection Tempered glass Corning Gorilla Glass 3
Screen-to-body ratio 82.2% 83.4%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 93.1% -
PWM Not detected -
Response time 37 ms -
Contrast 1689:1 -
Screen space comparison
Poco Pad
12.1β€³ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Redmi Pad SE
11β€³ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~20% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
399 nits
n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [3]

Design and build

Height 255.53 mm (10.06 inches) 280 mm (11.02 inches)
Width 167.08 mm (6.58 inches) 181.85 mm (7.16 inches)
Thickness 7.36 mm (0.29 inches) 7.52 mm (0.3 inches)
Weight 478 g (16.86 oz) 571 g (20.14 oz)
Waterproof No -
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Green, Purple Gray, Blue
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 427 cm2 (66.2 inches2) 509 cm2 (78.9 inches2)
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
82.2%
Poco Pad +1%
83.4%
Tablet Ranking (128th and 85th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (100th and 64th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE and Xiaomi Poco Pad
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
Max clock 2400 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)
- 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
Manufacturing TSMC Samsung
Lithography process 6 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Hexagon 686 Yes
GPU
Graphics Adreno 610 Adreno 710
GPU shading units 128 256
GPU clock 1114 MHz 940 MHz
FLOPS ~285.2 GFLOPS ~481.3 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE and Xiaomi Poco Pad
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Poco Pad +150%
1032
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Poco Pad +109%
2976
Compute Score (GPU)
Poco Pad +565%
2314
Compute Score (GPU) 348 2314
Single-core score 412 1032
Multi-core score 1423 2976
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
411020
Poco Pad +89%
778166
CPU 173875 297225
GPU 27779 73188
Memory 99996 152467
UX 109370 255286
Total score 411020 778166
Samples [2 tests] [2 tests]
PCMark 3.0
Poco Pad +84%
12964
Web score 7122 13631
Video editing 3683 6946
Photo editing 12514 24734
Data manipulation 5947 11507
Writing score 9135 13590

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-31 (Bobikbo17)AnTuTu411020
πŸ“˜ 2025-10-09 (Roman)AnTuTu408473
Xiaomi Poco Pad
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-29 (SRG)GeekBench CPU1025 / 2768
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-28 (SRG)AnTuTu770063
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-15 (Jeff)AnTuTu778166
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-20 (Vxmpiri)GeekBench GPU2314
πŸ“˜ 2025-04-20 (Vxmpiri)GeekBench CPU1032 / 2976

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 4 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 256 GB
Storage type eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1024 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 13 Android 14
ROM HyperOS 1.0 HyperOS 1.0
OS size 22 GB -

Battery

Capacity 8000 mAh 10000 mAh
Max charge power 18 W 33 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No Yes
Fast charging Yes (24% in 30 min) Yes (29% in 30 min)
Full charging time 2:45 hr 2:00 hr
Battery life tests
Web browsing 10:41 hr -
Watching video 12:28 hr -
Gaming 06:20 hr -
Standby 183 hr -
General battery life
29:44 hr
n/a

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No No
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - - Bokeh mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 f/1.8
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 5 megapixels 8 megapixels
Aperture f/2.2 -
Sensor - CMOS
Sensor size 1/5.0" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch) 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch)
Pixel size - 1.12 micron
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* - 1
Type of SIM card No Nano
eSIM support* - No
Hybrid slot - No
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
88.3 dB
n/a

Other

Category Budget Mid-range
Announced August 2023 May 2024
Release date September 2023 May 2024
Launch price (MSRP) $249 $329
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Accelerometer
- Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 18 W Yes, 33 W
Further details
Notes on Poco Pad:
    - The 5G model has water resistance, a 128 GB memory option, and GPS. The Wi-Fi model has none of these features.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco Pad is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
10 (14.9%)
57 (85.1%)
Total votes: 67

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!