Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 vs iPad 11" (11th Gen, 2025)

74 out of 100
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
VS
73 out of 100
Apple iPad 11

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11.2-inch Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3) that was released on November 26, 2025, against the Apple iPad 11" (11th Gen, 2025), which is powered by Apple A16 Bionic and came out 9 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Delivers 57% higher peak brightness (732 against 467 nits)
  • Comes with 1152 mAh larger battery capacity: 8850 vs 7698 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
  • 30% higher pixel density (344 vs 264 PPI)
  • Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 30W)
  • CPU with a higher amount of cores (+2)
  • Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Apple iPad 11" (11th Gen, 2025)
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • 38% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2589 and 1873 points
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 and Apple iPad 11" (11th Gen, 2025) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
8 / 256 GB
VS
6 / 128 GB
80.1
(Good)
Value Index
124.4
(Excellent)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD IPS LCD
Size 11.2 inches 11 inches
Resolution 2136 x 3200 pixels 1640 x 2360 pixels
Aspect ratio 3:2 3:2
PPI 344 ppi 264 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 60 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate - No
Max rated brightness - 500 nits
Max rated brightness in HDR 800 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision No
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 85.7% 80.8%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 99.2% 96.2%
PWM Not detected 21120 Hz
Response time 27 ms 38 ms
Contrast 1689:1 531:1
Screen space comparison
Poco Pad X1
11.2β€³ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
iPad 11" (11th Gen, 2025)
11β€³ (3:2 ratio) = 55.8 in2
~3% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
732 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) 248.6 mm (9.79 inches)
Width 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) 179.5 mm (7.07 inches)
Thickness 6.18 mm (0.24 inches) 7 mm (0.28 inches)
Weight 500 g (17.64 oz) 477 g (16.83 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Blue Silver, Blue, Pink, Yellow
Fingerprint scanner No Yes, in-button
Area 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) 446 cm2 (69.2 inches2)
Repairability - Average (2.78/5)
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (49th and 56th place)
iPad Ranking (#16th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 and Apple iPad 11" (11th Gen, 2025)
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 Apple A16 Bionic
Max clock 2800 MHz 3460 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 4 + 3) 6 (2 + 4)
Architecture - 3 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A520
- 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720
- 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X4
- 4 cores at 2.02 GHz: Sawtooth
- 2 cores at 3.46 GHz: Everest
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes Apple Neural Engine
GPU
Graphics Adreno 732 Apple GPU 5-core
GPU shading units 768 640
GPU clock 950 MHz 1398 MHz
FLOPS ~1459.2 GFLOPS ~1789.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 and Apple iPad 11" (11th Gen, 2025)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 9069 19767
Single-core score 1873 2589
Multi-core score 5149 6111
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 518099 498926
GPU 424760 466010
Memory 280369 202429
UX 424500 534152
Total score 1647728 1701517
Samples [46 tests] [6 tests]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-01 (Abolfazl)AnTuTu1753254
πŸ“˜ 2026-08-31 (Abolfazl)AnTuTu1753254
Apple iPad 11" (11th Gen, 2025)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-23 (Anr1ll)AnTuTu1729497
πŸ“˜ 2026-07-20 (Giga)GeekBench CPU2702 / 6394
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-17 (Luq)AnTuTu1701517
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-26 (ThΓ nh)AnTuTu1744337
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-19 (Faeri)AnTuTu1628541

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 8 GB 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR5X LPDDR5
Channels 4 4
Storage
Storage size 256 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 4.0 NVMe
Memory card No No

Software

Operating system Android 15 iPadOS 18.4 (Can be upgraded to iPadOS 26.5)
ROM HyperOS 2.0 -
OS size 32 GB 23 GB
OS updates - 5 years

Battery

Capacity 8850 mAh 7698 mAh
Max charge power 45 W 30 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (50% in 30 min) Yes (34% in 30 min)
Full charging time 1:20 hr 1:58 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing - 06:06 hr
Watching video - 07:41 hr
Gaming - 05:31 hr
Standby - 220 hr
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 13 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 4160 x 3120 4032 x 3024
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 60FPS
1080p video recording Up to 60FPS Up to 60FPS
Slow motion - 240 FPS (1080p)
Lenses 1) Standard: 13 MP
1) Standard: 12 MP
Camera features - - Bokeh mode
Standard lens
Image resolution 13 MP 12 MP
Aperture f/2.2 f/1.8
Sensor Omnivision OV13B10 -
Sensor size 1/3.06" (β‰ˆ 0.33 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 4032 x 3024
Aperture f/2.3 f/2.4
Sensor Omnivision OV08D10 CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 60 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS - GPS, GLONASS
NFC* Yes No
Infrared port Yes No
Network
Type of SIM card No eSIM
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot - No
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.0 Stereo
Headphone audio jack No No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced November 2025 March 2025
Release date November 2025 March 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $399 $349
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Barometer
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Yes, 45 W Yes, 30 W
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

If the display, battery life, and design are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Poco Pad X1. But if the camera, performance, gaming, and software are more of a priority – go for the Apple iPad 11" (11th Gen, 2025).

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
21 (61.8%)
13 (38.2%)
Total votes: 34

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!