Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 vs Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
74
out of 100
VS
56
out of 100
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 11.2-inch Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3) that was released on November 26, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite, which is powered by Exynos 1380 and came out 3 months before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
- 2.6x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1647K versus 634K)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- 51% higher pixel density (344 vs 228 PPI)
- Delivers 67% higher peak brightness (732 against 438 nits)
- Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
- Comes with 850 mAh larger battery capacity: 8850 vs 8000 mAh
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
- Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 25W)
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1024GB
- Ready for eSIM technology
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 11.2 inches | 10.9 inches |
| Resolution | 2136 x 3200 pixels | 1320 x 2112 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 344 ppi | 228 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Max rated brightness | - | 500 nits |
| Max rated brightness in HDR | 800 nits | - |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 81.7% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.2% | 95.2% |
| PWM | Not detected | Not detected |
| Response time | 27 ms | 40 ms |
| Contrast | 1689:1 | 1800:1 |
Screen space comparison
Poco Pad X1
11.2″ (3:2 ratio) = 57.9 in2
Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
10.9″ (16:10 ratio) = 53.4 in2
~8% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 251.22 mm (9.89 inches) | 254.3 mm (10.01 inches) |
| Width | 173.42 mm (6.83 inches) | 165.8 mm (6.53 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.18 mm (0.24 inches) | 6.5 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 500 g (17.64 oz) | 524 g (18.48 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue | Silver, Red |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 436 cm2 (67.5 inches2) | 422 cm2 (65.4 inches2) |
| Repairability | - | Average (2.86/5) |
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (49th and 105th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (35th and 80th place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
| Max clock | 2800 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 4 + 3) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3 cores at 1.9 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 4 cores at 2.6 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 2.8 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | Samsung |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 5 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 732 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| GPU shading units | 768 | 160 |
| GPU clock | 950 MHz | 949 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~1459.2 GFLOPS | ~303.7 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 9069 | 3123 |
| Single-core score | 1873 | 1011 |
| Multi-core score | 5149 | 2951 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 518099 | 244859 |
| GPU | 424760 | 91068 |
| Memory | 280369 | 122651 |
| UX | 424500 | 176286 |
| Total score | 1647728 | 634864 |
| Samples | [46 tests] | Less than 3 |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Stability | - | 87% |
| Graphics test | - | 5 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 876 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | - | 8610 |
| Video editing | - | 6004 |
| Photo editing | - | 23113 |
| Data manipulation | - | 8512 |
| Writing score | - | 12376 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Poco Pad X1
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-01 (Abolfazl) | AnTuTu | 1753254 |
| 📘 2026-08-31 (Abolfazl) | AnTuTu | 1753254 |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S10 Lite
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-05-07 (Lagymation) | AnTuTu | 634864 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card | No | MicroSD |
| Memory card max size | - | Up to 1024 GB |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | One UI 7.0 |
| OS size | 32 GB | - |
| OS updates | - | 5 years |
Battery
| Capacity | 8850 mAh | 8000 mAh |
| Max charge power | 45 W | 25 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (50% in 30 min) | Yes |
| Full charging time | 1:20 hr | 2:00 hr |
| Battery cycles | - | 2000 cycles |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4160 x 3120 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | - | No |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 8 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | - |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV13B10 | - |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Number of SIM* | - | 1 |
| Type of SIM card | No | Nano |
| eSIM support* | No | Yes |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| LTE Cat* | - | 18 |
| 5G support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | November 2025 | August 2025 |
| Release date | November 2025 | August 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $319 |
| SAR (body) | - | 0.92 W/kg |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass |
- Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 45 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Galaxy Tab S10 Lite:
- GPS and compass are only available on the cellular model.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Poco Pad X1 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 2