Xiaomi Redmi K Pad vs Lenovo Yoga Tab
Here we compared two flagship tablets: the 8.8-inch Xiaomi Redmi K Pad (with MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus) that was released on June 26, 2025, against the Lenovo Yoga Tab, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and came out 2 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
- Higher display refresh rate – 165 Hz
- Supports higher wattage charging (67W versus 45W)
- 29% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (3004K versus 2333K)
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- 19% higher pixel density (403 vs 340 PPI)
- Much smaller footprint: 36% more compact case (42 vs 65.7 square inches)
- Faster storage type - UFS 4.1 versus UFS 4.0
- Weighs 132 grams less
- 23% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 2657 and 2160 points
- Has a built-in infrared port
Reasons to consider the Lenovo Yoga Tab
- Water-resistant body (IP53 classification)
- Has a 2.3 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 1360 mAh larger battery capacity: 8860 vs 7500 mAh
- Fingerprint scanner
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | LTPS LCD |
| Size | 8.8 inches | 11.1 inches |
| Resolution | 1880 x 3008 pixels | 3200 x 2000 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 403 ppi | 340 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max rated brightness | 700 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | No |
| Touch sampling rate | 360 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.9% | 84.3% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 99.8% | - |
| PWM | Not detected | - |
| Response time | 23 ms | - |
| Contrast | 1486:1 | - |
Screen space comparison
Yoga Tab
11.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 55.4 in2
Redmi K Pad
8.8″ (16:10 ratio) = 34.8 in2
~59% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 205.1 mm (8.07 inches) | 255.52 mm (10.06 inches) |
| Width | 132 mm (5.2 inches) | 165.84 mm (6.53 inches) |
| Thickness | 6.5 mm (0.26 inches) | 6.2 mm (0.24 inches) |
| Weight | 326 g (11.5 oz) | 458 g (16.16 oz) |
| Waterproof | No | IP53 |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple | Gray, Green |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | Yes, in-button |
| Area | 271 cm2 (42 inches2) | 424 cm2 (65.7 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (29th and 38th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (22nd and 26th place)
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max clock | 3730 MHz | 3300 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 - 1 core at 3.73 GHz: Cortex-X925 |
- 2 cores at 2.27 GHz: Cortex-A520 - 2 cores at 2.96 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 3 cores at 3.15 GHz: Cortex-A720 - 1 core at 3.3 GHz: Cortex-X4 |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 3 nanometers | 4 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek NPU 890 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 750 |
| GPU shading units | 1536 | 1536 |
| GPU clock | 1612 MHz | 903-1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~4952.1 GFLOPS | ~2774 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 24373 | 16642 |
| Single-core score | 2657 | 2160 |
| Multi-core score | 8298 | 5672 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 923460 | 643259 |
| GPU | 1042496 | 818824 |
| Memory | 407660 | 348314 |
| UX | 631143 | 522888 |
| Total score | 3004759 | 2333285 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [298 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 77% | 90% |
| Graphics test | 16 FPS | 12 FPS |
| Graphics score | 2157 | 1656 |
3DMark Solar Bay
| Graphics test | 38 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 1 | 40 FPS | 36 FPS |
| Section 2 | 38 FPS | 32 FPS |
| Section 3 | 34 FPS | 27 FPS |
| Graphics score | 9914 | 8316 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 17873 | 32701 |
| Video editing | 6768 | 9052 |
| Photo editing | 34918 | 55325 |
| Data manipulation | 17855 | 16739 |
| Writing score | 24733 | 30383 |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi K Pad
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2025-12-09 -> Andre Suhen | AnTuTu 11 | 3004759 |
Lenovo Yoga Tab
No benchmark results yet
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory clock | 5333 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage size | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card | No | No |
Software
| Operating system | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| ROM | HyperOS 2.0 | - |
| OS size | 32 GB | - |
Battery
| Capacity | 7500 mAh | 8860 mAh |
| Max charge power | 67 W | 45 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | Yes | - |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | - | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | Up to 30FPS | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 60FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 13 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP 2) Macro: 2 MP |
| Camera features | - | - |
| Image resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06" (≈ 0.33 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Image resolution | - | 2 MP |
| Stabilization | - | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | 1/4" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | Yes | No |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | No | - |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | 2.2 |
| Headphone audio jack | No | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | June 2025 | September 2025 |
| Release date | June 2025 | September 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | $449 |
| Sensors | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
- Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer |
| Bundled charger | Yes, 67 W | Not included |
Further details
Notes on Redmi K Pad:
- The tablet features 2 USB Type-C 3.2 ports with Bypass charging and supports a magnetic stylus.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
These tablets have a lot in common, but we would recommend the Xiaomi Redmi K Pad. It has a better camera, performance, gaming, and software.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 1