Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro vs Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4) that was released on September 24, 2025, against the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus), which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 7300. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
  • Comes with 4960 mAh larger battery capacity: 12000 vs 7040 mAh
  • Has a 1.1 inches larger screen size
  • Higher display refresh rate – 120 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.4)
  • 19% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (986K versus 828K)
  • Compatible with Wi-Fi 6 wireless networks
  • 21% higher pixel density (249 vs 206 PPI)
  • Reverse charging feature
  • 18% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1239 and 1050 points
Reasons to consider the Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 15
  • Much smaller footprint: 15% more compact case (67.3 vs 78.7 square inches)
  • Weighs 133 grams less
  • Ready for eSIM technology

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus) crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Scores with a red asterisk (*) are approximate and may change in the future as we gather more data.
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
6 / 128 GB
VS
6 / 128 GB
73.4
(Good)
Value Index
78.1
(Good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD TFT LCD
Size 12.1 inches 11 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 1200 x 1920 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 5:3
PPI 249 ppi 206 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) -
Max rated brightness in HDR 650 nits -
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision No
Touch sampling rate 360 Hz -
Screen protection Tempered glass Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 83.5% 79.4%
Display tests
RGB color space 96.6% 97.2%
PWM Not detected Not detected
Response time 28 ms 25 ms
Contrast 1764:1 1534:1
Screen space comparison
Redmi Pad 2 Pro
12.1β€³ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
11β€³ (5:3 ratio) = 53.4 in2
~23% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
543 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 279.8 mm (11.02 inches) 257.1 mm (10.12 inches)
Width 181.7 mm (7.15 inches) 168.7 mm (6.64 inches)
Thickness 7.5 mm (0.3 inches) 6.9 mm (0.27 inches)
Weight 610 g (21.52 oz) 477 g (16.83 oz)
Waterproof No No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Silver, Gray, Purple Silver, Gray
Fingerprint scanner No No
Area 508 cm2 (78.8 inches2) 434 cm2 (67.2 inches2)
Repairability Average (2.74/5) Average (2.8/5)
Drop resistance Very good (B) Β· 208 drops -
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (80th and 103rd place)
Android Tablet Ranking (61st and 78th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 MediaTek Dimensity 7300
Max clock 2700 MHz 2500 MHz
CPU cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
- 3 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
- 1 core at 2.7 GHz: Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
- 4 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.5 GHz: Cortex-A78
L3 cache - 4 MB
Manufacturing TSMC TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 655
GPU
Graphics Adreno 810 Mali-G615 MP2
GPU shading units 256 256
GPU clock 895 MHz 1047 MHz
FLOPS ~458.2 GFLOPS ~536.1 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
Compute Score (GPU) 4784 -
Single-core score 1239 1050
Multi-core score 3286 3102
Sources: Geekbench [3]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
CPU 380886 321298
GPU 190421 104848
Memory 139368 178637
UX 276207 223268
Total score 986882 828051
Samples Less than 3 [5 tests]

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 (Deepa)Geekbench 6 GPU4784
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 (Deepa)Geekbench 6 CPU1239 / 3286
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-03 (Deepa)AnTuTu 11986882
Samsung Galaxy Tab A11+ (Plus)
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-08 (nghia)AnTuTu 11821867
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-08 (nghia)AnTuTu 11807986
πŸ“˜ 2026-04-23 (SAGM)AnTuTu 11881208
πŸ“˜ 2026-03-21 -> nazarkasiianAnTuTu 11828051
πŸ“˜ 2026-02-14 (May)AnTuTu 11838918

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 6 GB 6 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory clock 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 2 2
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 2048 GB Up to 2048 GB

Software

Operating system Android 15 Android 16
ROM HyperOS 2.0 One UI 8.0
OS size 34 GB 28.03 GB
OS updates 0 years 5 years

Battery

Capacity 12000 mAh 7040 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 25 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Ion
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging Yes No
Fast charging Yes (30% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 60 min)
Full charging time 2:20 hr 2:05 hr
Battery cycles 1000 cycles 1200 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 08:13 hr -
Watching video 11:17 hr -
Gaming 07:52 hr -
Standby 233 hr -
General battery life

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No No
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No No
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 8 MP
Camera features - -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 8 MP
Aperture f/2.0 -
Sensor size 1/4" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 5 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Aperture f/2.2 -
Focal length 17 mm -
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/5.0" (β‰ˆ 0.2 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization No No
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.1
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS - GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* - 1
Type of SIM card No Nano
eSIM support* No Yes
Hybrid slot No No
5G support No Yes

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes Yes
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced September 2025 September 2025
Release date September 2025 December 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $299 $249
Sensors - Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Compass
Bundled charger Yes, 33 W Not included
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
50 (69.4%)
22 (30.6%)
Total votes: 72

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!