Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro vs Lenovo Idea Tab Pro

59 out of 100
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
VS
70 out of 100
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro

Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) that was released on April 10, 2024, against the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro, which is powered by MediaTek Dimensity 8300 and came out 11 months after. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.

Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Memory

Key differences

An overview of the main advantages of each tablet
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
  • Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
  • Delivers 68% higher peak brightness (648 against 385 nits)
  • More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
  • Weighs 49 grams less
  • Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
  • 2.4x better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1604K versus 671K)
  • Shows 36% longer battery life (32:09 vs 23:43 hours)
  • Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
  • Newer Bluetooth version (v5.3)
  • Fingerprint scanner
  • Ability to record video in 4K resolution
  • Has 33% more RAM: 8GB versus 6GB
  • Supports higher wattage charging (45W versus 33W)

Review

Evaluation of Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and Lenovo Idea Tab Pro crucial features
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
NanoReview Score
Final comparison evaluation
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
πŸ“± Primary usage:

Value for money (Beta)

To get an accurate value-for-money index, update the default prices with actual prices from your country’s retailers (for the selected memory configs) and press the "Calculate" button.
Currency
6 / 128 GB
VS
8 / 128 GB
74.5
(Good)
Value Index
98.4
(Very good)

Tests and specifications

Comparison table of technical specifications and tests

Display

Type IPS LCD LTPS LCD
Size 12.1 inches 12.7 inches
Resolution 1600 x 2560 pixels 1840 x 2944 pixels
Aspect ratio 16:10 16:10
PPI 249 ppi 273 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (30-120 Hz) Yes
Max rated brightness 600 nits 400 nits
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision No
Touch sampling rate 240 Hz -
Screen protection Corning Gorilla Glass 3 Tempered glass
Screen-to-body ratio 83.4% 84.8%
Display features - DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
Display tests
RGB color space 94% 98.4%
PWM Not detected Not detected
Response time 20 ms 29 ms
Contrast 1283:1 ∞ Infinity
Screen space comparison
Idea Tab Pro
12.7β€³ (16:10 ratio) = 72.5 in2
Redmi Pad Pro
12.1β€³ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
~10% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
648 nits
385 nits
Sources: NotebookCheck [3], [4]

Design and build

Height 280 mm (11.02 inches) 291.8 mm (11.49 inches)
Width 181.85 mm (7.16 inches) 189.1 mm (7.44 inches)
Thickness 7.52 mm (0.3 inches) 6.9 mm (0.27 inches)
Weight 571 g (20.14 oz) 620 g (21.87 oz)
Waterproof IP52 No
Rear material Metal Metal
Frame material Metal Metal
Colors Gray, Blue, Green Gray, Green
Fingerprint scanner No Yes, in-button
Area 509 cm2 (78.9 inches2) 552 cm2 (85.5 inches2)
Repairability - Excellent (4.04/5)
Drop resistance - Bad (E) Β· 14 drops
Screen-to-body ratio
84.8%
Tablet Ranking (99th and 64th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (74th and 47th place)

Performance

Chipset specifications of Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
SoC
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 MediaTek Dimensity 8300
Max clock 2400 MHz 3350 MHz
CPU cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55
- 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78
- 4 cores at 2.2 GHz: Cortex-A510
- 3 cores at 3.2 GHz: Cortex-A715
- 1 core at 3.35 GHz: Cortex-A715
L3 cache - 4 MB
Manufacturing Samsung TSMC
Lithography process 4 nanometers 4 nanometers
Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 780
GPU
Graphics Adreno 710 Mali-G615 MP5
GPU shading units 256 768
GPU clock 940 MHz 1400 MHz
FLOPS ~481.3 GFLOPS ~2150.4 GFLOPS

Benchmarks

Benchmark comparison of Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro and Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
1405
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
4438
Compute Score (GPU)
Idea Tab Pro +247%
7982
Compute Score (GPU) 2299 7982
Single-core score 1020 1405
Multi-core score 2975 4438
Sources: Geekbench [3], [4]
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
671022
Idea Tab Pro +139%
1604810
CPU 284982 531924
GPU - 401550
Memory 136497 290446
UX 249543 380890
Total score 671022 1604810
Samples Less than 3 [64 tests]
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Idea Tab Pro +250%
881
Stability 98% 77%
Graphics test 2 FPS 7 FPS
Graphics score 252 881
3DMark Solar Bay
Graphics test - 14 FPS
Section 1 - 16 FPS
Section 2 - 14 FPS
Section 3 - 12 FPS
Graphics score - 3688
Sources: 3DMark [5], [6]
PCMark 3.0
Web score 13114 -
Video editing 7079 -
Photo editing 22606 -
Data manipulation 10865 -
Writing score 13799 -

Recent User Tests

The latest benchmark tests that have been submitted by users
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-06-11 (Minh Kha)AnTuTu 11671022
πŸ“˜ 2025-02-11 (OwO)Geekbench 6 GPU2299
πŸ“˜ 2025-02-11 (OwO)Geekbench 6 CPU1020 / 2975
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro
DateBenchmarkResult
πŸ“˜ 2026-09-06 (JOSUK3)AnTuTu 111598851
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-19 (JRioux)Geekbench 6 GPU7982
πŸ“˜ 2026-01-19 (JRioux)Geekbench 6 CPU1405 / 4438

Memory

Configuration
RAM
RAM size 6 GB 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory clock 2133 MHz -
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage size 128 GB 128 GB
Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
Memory card MicroSD MicroSD
Memory card max size Up to 1536 GB Up to 1024 GB

Software

Operating system Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) Android 14
ROM HyperOS 3 -
OS size 28 GB 46 GB
OS updates - 7 years

Battery

Capacity 10000 mAh 10200 mAh
Max charge power 33 W 45 W
Battery type Li-Po Li-Po
Replaceable No No
Wireless charging No No
Reverse charging No No
Fast charging Yes (28% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 50 min)
Full charging time 2:00 hr 2:20 hr
Battery cycles - 1000 cycles
Battery life tests
Web browsing 07:10 hr 13:21 hr
Watching video 11:19 hr 18:05 hr
Gaming 05:30 hr 08:22 hr
Standby 149 hr 157 hr
General battery life
23:43 hr
32:09 hr

Main camera

Matrix 8 megapixels 13 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 4160 x 3120
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Digital Digital
8K video recording No No
4K video recording No Up to 30FPS
1080p video recording Up to 30FPS Up to 30FPS
Slow motion No -
Lenses 1) Standard: 8 MP
1) Standard: 13 MP
Camera features - Bokeh mode -
Standard lens
Image resolution 8 MP 13 MP
Aperture f/1.8 f/2.4
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus Phase autofocus Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital

Selfie camera

Megapixels 8 megapixels 8 megapixels
Image resolution 3264 x 2448 -
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/4.0" (β‰ˆ 0.25 inch) -
Pixel size 1.12 micron -
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS
Depth sensor (TOF 3D) No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi standard Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB-Storage mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS - GPS, GLONASS, Galileo
NFC* No No
Infrared port No No
Network
Number of SIM* 2 -
Type of SIM card No No
eSIM support* No No
Hybrid slot Yes No
5G support Yes No

Sound

Speakers 4.0 4.0
Headphone audio jack Yes No
FM radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speakers test
Max loudness
85.6 dB

Other

Category Mid-range Mid-range
Announced April 2024 March 2025
Release date April 2024 March 2025
Launch price (MSRP) $259 $379
Sensors - Hall-effect sensor
- Proximity sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient light sensor
- Hall-effect sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Fingerprint
Bundled charger Not included Yes, 45 W
Further details
Notes on Idea Tab Pro:
    - The 128 GB model uses UFS 3.1, while the 256 GB version has UFS 4.0.
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.

Conclusion

After analyzing all the data, we think that the Lenovo Idea Tab Pro is definitely a better buy.

Cast your vote

So, which tablet would you choose?
1 (7.1%)
13 (92.9%)
Total votes: 14

User opinions

You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below
🌐 Register your profile and become part of NanoReview community!