Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro vs Xiaomi Pad 6
Here we compared two mid-range tablets: the 12.1-inch Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2) that was released on April 10, 2024, against the Xiaomi Pad 6, which is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 and came out 1 year before. On this page, you will find tests, full specs, strengths, and weaknesses of each of the devices.
Select the amount of RAM to evaluate performance and value for money more precisely
Key differences
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
- Water-resistant body (IP52 classification)
- Has a 1.1 inches larger screen size
- Comes with 1160 mAh larger battery capacity: 10000 vs 8840 mAh
- Delivers 31% higher peak brightness (660 against 503 nits)
- Expandable storage via MicroSD card up to 1536GB
- More recent OS version: Android 16 versus 14
- More energy-efficient CPU – Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
- Includes a 3.5 mm headphone audio jack port
Reasons to consider the Xiaomi Pad 6
- 50% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (1005K versus 671K)
- Shows 20% longer battery life (28:21 vs 23:43 hours)
- Higher display refresh rate – 144 Hz
- Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR5 3200 MHz
- Ability to record video in 4K resolution
- 24% higher pixel density (309 vs 249 PPI)
- Much smaller footprint: 18% more compact case (64.9 vs 78.9 square inches)
- Faster storage type - UFS 3.1 versus UFS 2.2
- 29% faster in single-core GeekBench 6 test: 1315 and 1020 points
- Weighs 81 grams less
Review
Display
Screen quality, color accuracy, brightness
Camera
Photo and video recording quality
Performance
CPU and memory performance (apps, system)
Gaming
Capabilities for playing modern games
Battery
Battery life, charging type and speed
Connectivity
Networks, ports, data transmission
Select your primary usage scenario to get a more accurate NanoReview Score
Value for money (Beta)
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and testsDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 12.1 inches | 11 inches |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels | 1800 x 2880 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 16:10 | 16:10 |
| PPI | 249 ppi | 309 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (30-120 Hz) | No |
| Max rated brightness | 600 nits | 550 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch sampling rate | 240 Hz | - |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4% | 83.6% |
| Display features | - DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 |
| RGB color space | 94% | 97% |
| PWM | Not detected | 181600 Hz |
| Response time | 20 ms | 26 ms |
| Contrast | 1283:1 | 832:1 |
Screen space comparison
Redmi Pad Pro
12.1″ (16:10 ratio) = 65.8 in2
Pad 6
11″ (16:10 ratio) = 54.4 in2
~20% more screen space
Peak brightness test (auto)
Design and build
| Height | 280 mm (11.02 inches) | 253.95 mm (10 inches) |
| Width | 181.85 mm (7.16 inches) | 165.18 mm (6.5 inches) |
| Thickness | 7.52 mm (0.3 inches) | 6.51 mm (0.26 inches) |
| Weight | 571 g (20.14 oz) | 490 g (17.28 oz) |
| Waterproof | IP52 | No |
| Rear material | Metal | Metal |
| Frame material | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green | Silver, Gold, Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | No | No |
| Area | 509 cm2 (78.9 inches2) | 419 cm2 (65 inches2) |
Visual size comparison
Screen-to-body ratio
Tablet Ranking (100th and 95th place)
Android Tablet Ranking (75th and 71st place)
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 |
| Max clock | 2400 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.95 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Cortex-A78 |
- 4 cores at 1.8 GHz: Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55) - 3 cores at 2.42 GHz: Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 1 core at 3.2 GHz: Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77) |
| L3 cache | - | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing | Samsung | TSMC |
| Lithography process | 4 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Yes | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Adreno 710 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU shading units | 256 | 768 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz | 670 MHz |
| FLOPS | ~481.3 GFLOPS | ~1029.1 GFLOPS |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Compute Score (GPU)
| Compute Score (GPU) | 2299 | 3371 |
| Single-core score | 1020 | 1315 |
| Multi-core score | 2975 | 3506 |
AnTuTu Benchmark 11
| CPU | 284982 | 376827 |
| GPU | - | 151343 |
| Memory | 136497 | 182214 |
| UX | 249543 | 295214 |
| Total score | 671022 | 1005598 |
| Samples | Less than 3 | [15 tests] |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light
| Stability | 98% | - |
| Graphics test | 2 FPS | - |
| Graphics score | 252 | - |
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
| Graphics test | - | 6 FPS |
| Graphics score | - | 1147 |
PCMark 3.0
| Web score | 13114 | - |
| Video editing | 7079 | - |
| Photo editing | 22606 | - |
| Data manipulation | 10865 | - |
| Writing score | 13799 | - |
Recent User Tests
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-26 (Rithik) | AnTuTu 11 | 817723 |
| 📘 2026-09-24 (Rithik) | AnTuTu 12 | 886090 |
| 📘 2026-06-11 (Minh Kha) | AnTuTu 11 | 671022 |
| 📘 2025-02-11 (OwO) | Geekbench 6 GPU | 2299 |
| 📘 2025-02-11 (OwO) | Geekbench 6 CPU | 1020 / 2975 |
Xiaomi Pad 6
| Date | Benchmark | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 📘 2026-09-21 -> sbx.777 | AnTuTu 12 | 1143560 |
| 📘 2026-08-04 (Арсен) | AnTuTu 11 | 933942 |
| 📘 2026-07-21 (Peso Penguin) | AnTuTu 11 | 993797 |
| 📘 2026-06-27 (Aaru) | AnTuTu 11 | 932844 |
| 📘 2026-04-17 (Priyansh) | AnTuTu 11 | 1010069 |
Memory
Configuration
| RAM size | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory clock | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage size | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | No |
| Memory card max size | Up to 1536 GB | - |
Software
| Operating system | Android 14 (Can be upgraded to Android 16) | Android 13 (Can be upgraded to Android 14) |
| ROM | HyperOS 3 | HyperOS 1.0 |
| OS size | 28 GB | 21 GB |
Battery
| Capacity | 10000 mAh | 8840 mAh |
| Max charge power | 33 W | 33 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | Yes (28% in 30 min) | Yes (38% in 30 min) |
| Full charging time | 2:00 hr | 1:30 hr |
| Web browsing | 07:10 hr | 11:51 hr |
| Watching video | 11:19 hr | 15:38 hr |
| Gaming | 05:30 hr | 07:18 hr |
| Standby | 149 hr | 139 hr |
General battery life
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4160 x 3120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | Up to 30FPS |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 60FPS |
| Slow motion | No | 120 FPS (720p) |
| Lenses | 1) Standard: 8 MP |
1) Standard: 13 MP |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - |
| Image resolution | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | - |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Selfie camera
| Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | - |
| Aperture | - | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | - |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) | 1/4.0" (≈ 0.25 inch) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 micron | - |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
| Depth sensor (TOF 3D) | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/a/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| NFC* | No | No |
| Infrared port | No | No |
| Number of SIM* | 2 | - |
| Type of SIM card | No | No |
| eSIM support* | No | - |
| Hybrid slot | Yes | - |
| 5G support | Yes | - |
Sound
| Speakers | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | No |
| FM radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Speakers test
Max loudness
Other
| Category | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | April 2024 | April 2023 |
| Release date | April 2024 | April 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $259 | $299 |
| Successor | - | - Xiaomi Pad 8 |
| Sensors | - Hall-effect sensor - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
- Hall-effect sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor |
| Bundled charger | Not included | Yes, 33 W |
*Disclaimer! NFC, GSM network support, and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
If the performance, gaming, battery life, and connectivity are more important to you, then choose the Xiaomi Pad 6. But if the display, camera, and software are more of a priority – go for the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro.
Cast your vote
Total votes: 923